Tag

Branding

Browsing

It’s all about the reviews, so make sure yours are good.

By MediaStreet Staff Writers

More than three quarters of travellers use review sites such as Yelp and Trip Advisor to conduct research prior to booking services.

This is according to a survey conducted by The GO Group, an international ground transportation provider.

Travel GIF by Evan Hilton - Find & Share on GIPHY

The respondents were asked about site usage for accommodations, activities, events and ground transportation.

When asked about use of sites for hotels and other accommodations, 13% of respondents said they always check sites; 31% said they do so frequently, 34% said sometimes and 22% said never.

Fifteen percent said they always check sites for reviews about tours and activities; 25% and 34% said they do so frequently and sometimes, respectively. The results for checking on attractions and venues were similar were about the same.

Fewer people use review sites for ground transportation. Only 10% percent said always they did so; 23% said frequently and 40% replied sometimes.

The survey also asked how many people post on review sites. Just three percent said they always posted on the sites, nine percent do so frequently; 40% post sometimes and 26 % responded they have never posted on a review site.

“In addition to or even in lieu of obtaining information and referrals from close friends and family, more people are opting to use content generated by strangers as a guide for booking travel experiences, says John McCarthy, president, GO Group. “As reliance on online review sites continues to grow, it behooves all of us in the travel-related industries industry to regularly review and respond to posts, and monitor them for potential customer services issues.”

Angry Always Sunny GIF by It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia - Find & Share on GIPHY

The GO Group LLC is the nation’s largest airport transportation provider, offering shared rides, private vehicles, sedans, charters and tours, serving some 90 airports in North America, Mexico, the Caribbean and Europe and transporting more than 13 million passengers per year.

This study shows just how much babysitting and care you need to put into your online reviews. Like you don’t already have enough to do!

Have you listed your company in our Media Directory? It’s free! Everyone’s favourite price! Click here to do it now.

By Mary Hanbury

Logos are back with a vengeance.

At one time, visible logos were about the biggest faux pas a brand could commit, and now they’re back in vogue.

Designer brands such as Gucci and Calvin Klein have made flashy logos cool again, and suddenly millennials love them. Now, mass-market retailers want in.

In 2015, brands such as Abercrombie & Fitch, Coach, and Michael Kors started to reduce the number of logos on products to appeal to millennials. But the tide has turned.

In their most recent earnings calls, Ralph Lauren, Guess, and Abercrombie & Fitch all highlighted the move towards logos, CNBC reported.

“The focus on our icons was evident in our fall and Holiday assortment. Our Polo Bear sweaters and novelty items embellished with our iconic symbols like our Crest Logo and Downhill Ski Racer graphic were among our best sellers for the season,” Ralph Lauren CEO Patrice Louvet said in the company’s most recent earnings call.

The revival of logos is partly due to a move by brands to hearken back to previous collections. Calvin Klein, for example, relaunched its “American Classics” collection in 2017. In January, its ad campaign featuring the Kardashian-Jenner sisters showed the logo and label name prominently.

Gap has been doing the same. In January, the company said it would be launching “Archive Reissue – Logo Remix,” a collection of clothing and accessories to celebrate its logo.

Take a look at the brands that are cashing in on the logo trend:

Gucci T-shirt, $590.

Gucci T-shirt, $590.

Gucci

 

Adidas T-shirt at ASOS, $30.

Adidas T-shirt at ASOS, $30.

ASOS

 

Gap logo jacket, $49.97 (in the sale).

Gap logo jacket, $49.97 (in the sale).

Gap

Stussy old stock tee at Urban Outfitters, $35.

Stussy old stock tee at Urban Outfitters, $35.

Urban Outfitters

Fila at Urban Outfitters, $38.

Fila at Urban Outfitters, $38.

Urban Outfitters

Tommy Hilfiger sweatpants, $49.

Tommy Hilfiger sweatpants, $49.

Urban Outfitters

Guess handbag, $118.

Guess handbag, $118.

Guess

Guess logo tee, $39.

Guess logo tee, $39.

Guess

Coach clutch, $295.

Coach clutch, $295.

Coach

Cavin Klein has made its logo and brand name a prominent part of its new collection and ad campaign.

Cavin Klein has made its logo and brand name a prominent part of its new collection and ad campaign.

Facebook/Calvin Klein

Feature Image Credit: NBA player Willie Cauley-Stein wears a Gucci logo T-shirt. This shirt has become a fashion staple.Jerritt Clark/Stringer

By Mary Hanbury

Sourced from BUSINESS INSIDER UK

 

 

If you are marketing anything in the tourism game, this is what you need to know.

By MediaStreet Staff Writers

For those that are lucky enough to get away on holiday or go on an extended travel stint, we can predict what actvities you might be doing after a new study has been published by Hotels.com

The company have used a data-crunching bot to track what people are hashtagging the most on their sojourns. More than five million brags globally were analysed using a combination of Tweet data, Instagram posts and travel keywords and destinations mentioned on other social media. So here are the results.

Worldwide travellers are all about the culture: they enjoy musing around museums (300,000 brags), old-town charm (170,000 brags) and a spot of sunshine (130,000 brags), but they can also be found in floating restaurants, erotic museums and night markets.

TOP 10 GLOBAL THEMES

  1. Museum
  2. Rooftop bar
  3. Old Town
  4. Modern Art
  5. Opera
  6. Sunshine
  7. Olympic Games
  8. Cathedral
  9. Gallery
  10. Ballet

This travel bragging trend echoes the findings from the recent Hotels.com Mobile Travel Tracker report, which revealed that one in six travellers search social media before their trip to plan the photos they’ll take. And 56% of people surveyed admit to spending more than an hour a day on their smartphones while on holiday.

While travellers naturally brag about taking in the tourist hotspots and cultural offerings, more people than ever are sharing foodie ‘grams, shopping stories and luxe posts.

#Foodporn
You’re never more than an Insta-scroll away from #FoodPorn and the brag lists are brimming with culinary treats. Cakes in Stockholm and curry in Toronto spice up the brag lists, and New York steak and pizza both made the cut. Perhaps more surprisingly, enchiladas proved twice as popular as modern art in Mexico City, ice cream scooped 10% of all San Francisco brags and Jumbo Kingdom floating restaurant in Hong Kong took second place in the Hong Kong chart with more than 20,000 brags.

Shop ’til you drop
Shopping is a must-do for most travellers. Those visiting Paris brag more about the Rue Vieille du Temple, famous for its boutiques, than Le Louvre! Other top shop-spots included Bal Harbour in Miami, the Harbour City mall in Hong Kong, vintage shops in Melbourne and the stylish Cecile Copenhagen fashion brand made the Danish capital’s top 10.

Five-star luxury
When travellers check into a posh, luxury hotel they naturally want the world to know. The stunning 5-star Ritz Carlton in San Francisco topped the city’s brag list, the Four Seasons in Singapore proved brag-worthy and the Park Hyatt came in at number one in Seoul – most likely for its awe-inspiring rooftop pool.

Scott Ludwig at Hotels.com said, “Bragging about your travel experiences on social media has become the norm – if you didn’t get social kudos out of it, it didn’t happen!”

Have you listed your company in our Media Directory? It’s free! Everyone’s favourite price! Click here to do it now.

Adweek has called in the big guns for a huge collaboration which could be an example of how the rest of us will work in the future.

By MediaStreet Staff Writers

Everyone in advertising knows Adweek, a bible for marketers. Adweek has published articles for the brand marketing ecosystem since 1979. Adweek’s coverage reaches an engaged audience of more than 6 million professionals across platforms including print, digital, events, podcasts, newsletters, social media and mobile apps.

Today, the publication announced the launch of the Adweek Advisory Board, made up of 24 of the most innovative and creative executives who are shaping the modern brand marketing ecosystem.

Adweek says they recognise the need to synthesise a diversity of opinions to maintain its position as a voice in the marketplace. “Our newly formed Advisory Board will provide us – and our audiences – with the thought leadership and expertise we all need to help navigate the complex and constantly shifting ecosystem of today’s marketing and media world,” said Adweek editorial director James Cooper. “Adweek’s ultimate goal each day is helping our readers stay ahead of the curve and do their jobs better.”

“I am excited to be partnering with Adweek and joining its Advisory Board,” said GE CMO Linda Boff. “With digital transformation built into our DNA, we are in an especially unique position to guide and advise Adweek and the business community it serves.”

The Advisory Board will meet regularly with Adweek’s senior editorial team at gatherings across the country to discuss the pressing issues of the day. Members will also be on hand to publish thought leadership columns, speak at Adweek events and provide Adweek with insight and analysis on an as-needed basis across all platforms.

“The times we operate in aren’t easy. The pressure to deliver is daunting for even the most experienced here,” said board member Colleen DeCourcy, chief creative officer for agency network Wieden + Kennedy. “When an organisation like Adweek consciously turns its efforts to developing our talent, I am all in. Collaboration feels like the thing we need right now. All boats rise with the tide.”

Adweek’s Advisory Board Members:

  • Marisa Thalberg, Global CMO, Taco Bell
  • Linda Boff, CMO, GE
  • Adrienne Lofton, SVP of Global Brand Management, Under Armour
  • Andrew Keller, Global Creative Director, Facebook Creative Shop
  • Cameron Clayton, GM of Watson Content and IoT, IBM
  • Jon Suarez-Davis, Chief Strategy Officer, Salesforce Marketing Cloud
  • Ben Lamm, CEO and Founder, Conversable and Hypergiant
  • Caroline Papadatos, SVP of Global Solutions, LoyaltyOne
  • Alicia Hatch, CMO, Deloitte Digital
  • Baiju Shah, Chief Strategy Officer, Accenture Interactive
  • Joel Stillerman, Chief Content Officer, Hulu
  • Colin Kinsella, CEO North America, Havas Media Group
  • Michelle Lee, Editor in Chief, Allure
  • Tiffany R. Warren, SVP and Chief Diversity Officer, Omnicom, and Founder and President, ADCOLOR
  • Susie Nam, COO, Droga5
  • David Sable, Global CEO, Y&R
  • Colleen DeCourcy, Chief Creative Officer, Wieden + Kennedy
  • Michael Dill, President and CEO, Match Marketing Group
  • Bonin Bough, Author and TV Host
  • Terrance Williams, CMO and President of Emerging Businesses, Nationwide
  • Kasha Cacy, CEO, UM U.S.
  • David Mondragon, CEO of Triton Automotive Group and Senior Partner, Motormindz
  • Linda Yaccarino, Chairman of Advertising and Client Partnerships, NBCUniversal
  • Nannette LaFond-Dufour, Global Chief Client Officer, McCann Worldgroup

To read further about Adweek’s Advisory Board initiative, click here 

 

Have you listed your company in our Media Directory? It’s free! Everyone’s favourite price! Click here to do it now.

Brand managers, get on it!

By MediaStreet Staff Writers

Energy companies in the UK are using specific branding approaches instead of product innovation to keep customers, according to new research from the University of East Anglia (UEA).

While previous research has tended to focus on pricing, this study looked at the branding strategies and personalities of the Big Six energy firms – British Gas, SSE, EDF Energy, E.ON UK, npower and Scottish Power. They wanted to find out whether increasing consumer loyalty results in reducing switching behaviour. The Big Six represent more than 90 per cent of all energy supplied in the UK consumer sector.

The researchers looked at the electricity market between 2013 – when the number of customers switching providers reached its lowest level – and 2015. And, the researchers did find that brand personality consistency over time is important.

Consistent brands (such as EDF Energy) performed better, and their customers decreased switching. This was compared to firms like npower and Scottish Energy, who had significantly changed their brand personality position or communicated inconsistently in this period.

Providers that had a significantly different brand personality position between marketing communication channels, such as their website and annual report, also had more switching than those that remained consistent. Interestingly, the majority of the brands studied were inconsistent on this measure.

Lead author Dr Richard Rutter says that this research demonstrates the long-term importance of corporate branding. “Brand personality does have an impact on customer retention. The Big Six energy providers recognise the power of brand identity when attempting to persuade consumers to switch providers. Rather than doing so simply on the basis of superior financial offers, they are increasingly looking to build a long-term brand personality with which consumers will identify.

“These organisations wish to be viewed as customer-focused and as offering a fair deal to consumers. There seem to be subtle but important differences in the ways that each company is choosing to communicate with its domestic audience and some are more effective than others.”

Concentrating on companies’ communication through their websites and annual reports, the researchers examined what brand personality dimensions – defined as sincerity, excitement, competence, sophistication and ruggedness – were communicated most strongly and how consistently each organisation communicated its brand between the website and annual report. They then assessed the organisation’s performance, measured by consumer loyalty or switching behaviour.

They found that brands communicating excitement more strongly, such as EDF Energy, had the lowest levels of switching. The findings also suggest an ideal brand personality for the UK energy sector: low to medium levels of sincerity and competence and high levels of excitement and ruggedness communicated through the website lead to better performance. The authors say the annual report should maintain this, but also communicate a higher level of competence.

Said co-author Prof Konstantinos Chalvatzis, “Under scrutiny from the public and politicians, the energy sector is changing rapidly. Branding within the energy sector has become increasingly important, as energy firms seek to attract and, importantly, retain customers.

“We find that certain energy brands, for example EDF Energy have communicated their personality consistently, while others, such as npower and British Gas, seem to have repositioned themselves. A strong brand personality alone is not enough to prevent consumer switching, rather, particular dimensions of personality are more favourable than others and the relevance of specific personality traits can change.”

The authors recommend that firms should not drastically change their branding each year. Brand managers should also consider how to increase the communication of excitement in relation to their brands without being inauthentic, and ensure that their brand is consistent over time and between different marketing media.

Have you listed your company in our Media Directory? It’s free! Everyone’s favourite price! Click here to do it now.

By David Leonhardt

Most new entrepreneurs see a “brand” as a logo or slogan. For them, Nike’s brand is a swoosh with “Just do it!” attached.

After an entrepreneur has been around marketing a while, they start to realize that their brand is more than just a logo. It is what people feel about them and the impression their customers get that keeps them coming back. Seeing your logo or hearing your slogan is what triggers that feeling.

Now, is there a difference between branding online and branding offline? The short answer is yes. The long answer is explained below.

The fundamentals of branding

Enakshi Sharma lists 10 elements of branding:

  • Brand identity
  • Brand image
  • Brand positioning
  • Brand personality
  • Brand equity
  • Brand experience
  • Brand differentiation
  • Brand communication
  • Brand gap
  • Brand extension

Without getting into a debate over the definitions and merits of each element, I can say that these fundamentals do not vary between offline and offline branding. For instance, a brand that promises an eco-friendly product must make that same promise online or offline.

It is true that a company might have two different audiences. For instance, there might be an older demographic who prefers to shop at brick and mortar and a younger demographic that prefers to shop online. In that case, brand positioning would be different. The question the business would have to ask is whether it’s different enough that it needs two different brands?

A classic example is when Toys R Us branched out into Babies R Us. Two brands in the same “family”, but with a clear difference in brand positioning.

If online and offline positioning are not big enough to justify two different brands, a company has to be consistent in all other elements. Otherwise two things can happen:

  • People who shop online and offline will notice the difference and be confused … and the company will lose customers.
  • The company will lose cross-demographic customers, such as younger people who prefer in-store shopping.

Consistency online and offline

For a single brand, consistency is critical across online and offline branding. That includes:

  • colors on logos, promotional products, uniforms, in-store signage, website banners, etc.
  • language used when greeting customers in-store, on the phone and in live chat, as well as in advertising and on the website
  • messaging about the product’s and company’s image (luxury, fun-loving, environment, frugal, ease-of-use, etc.)
  • style of images used, which should reflect the overall messaging

Some of the most successful branding comes from putting offline products in front an online audience. You must be careful when doing so as you do not want to seem as if you are pushing advertising in front of someone who doesn’t want to see it. Great examples include Kuretake, Lululemon, and GoPro who put their products second while advertising on social media. They spend most of their time engaging with customers as opposed to putting products in front of customers’ faces.

There are differences

There are differences between online and offline branding. One difference is typeface. John Wood shares some interesting statistics on how people read differently offline and online.

Offline, people learned to read with a serif typeface, such as Times Roman. The letters are more clear and obvious, such as the difference between a lower-case L and an upper case I.

But online, people scan more than read, and when they read, it’s often on tiny hand-held devices. They read much better with a sans-serif typeface, such as Arial.

Language is another difference…sometimes. In online chats, customer service should use the same approach to speaking with customers as in-store sales staff would use, whether that is formal, ultra polite, casual, flowery, etc.

Brands also have more options to interact with customers online, and sometimes need to adapt their language to the context of the discussion. Without changing the basic impression of the business, a more relaxed approach might be needed to market on Snapchat, and a less flowery approach on Twitter (although there is more room for flowery with the new 280-character limit than with the old 140 limit).

When we write for businesses, we want to know where something will be published, so that we can tailor that text accordingly. But we are always careful to carry over all the elements of the brand image, regardless of the context.

Another difference is user-generated content, something that doesn’t exist in the offline world. This can include:

  • testimonials
  • employee stories
  • pics of videos from customers

When planning user generated content, make sure it aligns with your offline presence. For instance, make sure employees present the same image online as they do offline. You can’t control the pics or videos that customers send in, but you can control the context, how those images appear, the frames they are in, the pages they are on.

Try to build as similar as possible a customer experience when displaying user-generated content as you do when welcoming customers into your store. Keep in mind the fundamental elements of your brand with everything you do.You might have noticed that the differences between online and offline branding are small. They are no more than tweaks. Your branding works best when customers get the same messages, the same impression, the same feelings about your brand online and offline.

By David Leonhardt

View full profile ›

Sourced from Business 2 Community

Now? Fashion brands are meeting with social media influencers directly.

By MediaStreet Staff Writers

Hundreds of NY Fashion Week influencers were invited to a party specifically held to put them in front of brands that want some of the spotlight. The party was held by a company called Influence, which connects brands and influencers. Together, they create social campaigns that expand visibility and engage new audiences for brands. The influencer gets paid, and the brands get to reach audiences that they might not be able to access using other methods. Welcome to the “now” of fashion and brand marketing.

Influence is a sister company to the already-successful operation called Newswire. Newswire currently have an online portal that publishes thousands of press releases every day. Journalists and influencers can go straight to company news, by keyword or subject search. This means that they can get their news directly from the companies, rather than have the interaction brokered through a PR agency. This renders the traditional PR agency almost obsolete.

The way the PR industry is changing is similar to the way that fashion magazines are going. Teen magazines and fashion publications are no longer the huge, powerful entities that brokered deals between brands/fashion houses and their audiences. Now, it is the online fashion influencers who have huge sway with their fans, and brands can contact them directly. This circumvents the hugely expensive fashion magazines, whose circulations are falling dramatically.

As an example, a top YouTube fashion influencer is Chriselle Lim. Her channel is growing at a breakneck pace. Her videos reveal how to transform basic pieces of clothing into stylish apparel. Chriselle has support from global brands such as Target and Estee Lauder.

The change in the way brands and fashion are marketed has been incredibly rapid. Fashion magazines? Pah. Now Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and YouTube are the place to put brand marketing spend.

But back to the party. The event hosted hundreds of NY Fashion Week Influencers at Manhattan’s chic Sixty Soho Hotel. Influencers and brands from across the globe arrived to share in networking and developing opportunities for campaign partnerships that strengthen an Influencer’s channel and widen content reach for brands. The party was also used to promote Influence.com itself. And it worked, because here you are, reading about this new company.

Said Director of Influencer Marketing, Magnolia Sevenler, “Whether you are an influencer or marketer, the Influence by Newswire platform provides a community to build your campaigns.”

According to Sevenler, the platform has been well-received from both marketers and creators for its simplicity and reach. “It’s exciting to see all the positive feedback…as we enter a new era of marketing, where micro-influencers can be rewarded for their passions and brands can reach new untapped audiences.”

The company has plans to expand its network and add additional features to enhance users’ experience. And it is doing this all because the fashion magazine industry is destined for a papery grave. It’s time to move on, people, and bring your marketing spend with you.

Have you listed your company in our Media Directory? It’s free! Everyone’s favourite price! Click here to do it now.

 

By 

You can learn a lot from your competitors. Columnist Sam Welch discusses easy ways to gather data on the competition without using third-party tools or paid subscriptions.

In the course of my work, I get the chance to help companies of all shapes and sizes get on track to achieve long-term, sustained growth. One of my most requested services is the gathering of competitive intelligence. Clients have a fervent desire to better understand the competitive landscape, but they often lack the resources to obtain this information and effectively integrate it into their marketing strategies.

This series of articles will focus on some simple ways you can gather actionable data on your competitors — without the use of third-party tools or paid subscriptions — and weave it into your own marketing efforts.

A few months back, I was having a conversation with a client about competitor research, and he made a comment that stuck with me. He compared the methodology of a project I had just presented to that of a Walmart marketing executive spending most of her day at Target.

In my eyes, this was an apt analogy. Nearly all the data I had gathered was publicly accessible and came from his competitors’ websites. I had spent hours looking at product features, messaging and site architecture and had analyzed it all against his company’s own user experience and product offerings to come up with (I hoped) at least a few actionable insights.

Luckily, I illuminated some not-so-obvious weaknesses that warranted immediate attention from his team. The client was happy, and I got to keep my job.

Simply stated, there is a lot that can be learned from immersing yourself in the lives of your competitors.

And to clarify, I am not recommending you go to your competitor’s office and drink all the LaCroix in their microkitchen. Through this article, however, I will demonstrate how you can leverage your competitors’ strengths, weaknesses and unique selling points to better position yourself in the market.

Gather the data

Before you begin the actual competitor research, take time to refamiliarize yourself with your company’s product offerings, site features, value propositions and perceived competitive advantages. List and categorize everything you can think of, and be as detailed as possible. The granularity will become important later, when you analyze your data against your competitors’.

Below is an example list of features that you could explore. (This is in no way comprehensive.) Note that your categories should be tailored to your specific product.

  • Pricing/cost (examples: a product’s price, a bank’s fees, different financing options for a subscription plan).
  • Site resources (examples: blogs, FAQs, reviews, calculator tools — anything that is not human aid).
  • Customer support (examples: online chat, 24/7 phone support).
  • Rewards/bonuses/discounts (examples: signup bonus, loyalty rewards programs, referral bonuses).
  • Security features (examples: site encryption, guarantees/warranties).
  • Experience/certifications/licenses/awards — pretty much anything that shows off accolades.

If you have multiple discrete products, consider completing this exercise for each of them.

Next, choose up to three competitors you believe to be the most similar in terms of customers and product. Navigate to their websites and dive in head-first. Start recording everything you can across the previously established categories, making additions wherever appropriate.

The goal at this stage is to collect as much information as possible because you never know what might be significant when you perform cross-analysis.

Connect the dots

Now that you have your list of product features and offerings mapped out for you and your competitors, it’s time to connect that information to what your ideal customer cares about and their decision-making process. I recommend making a prioritized list of the criteria customers use when deciding to purchase your product or use your service.

Here are some typical examples:

  • Quality of service/product.
  • Price.
  • Security.
  • Overall ease of the service.
  • Customer support.

A list like this probably already exists at your company. However, I encourage you to conduct your own research to ensure its validity, as assumptions are often made about customers that aren’t rooted in hard data.

Survey your own customer base to learn more about their motivations and how they evaluate your product against the competition. If surveys are not feasible, consider secondary sources like online publications, blog posts, or even customer reviews. A lot of valuable information is revealed when customers voice their satisfaction or discontent.

Once you are comfortable with your list, determine its alignment with your product data and think critically about the implications.

  • Are your competitors doing a better job at speaking to what truly matters to customers?
  • Have you failed to address key customer decision criteria on your website and in messaging?
  • Is there a product feature that differentiates you from the pack that you could bring to the foreground?
  • What are your true competitive advantages? Are they the same as before?
  • Where are your biggest weaknesses?
  • What are the table stakes? Are there things that every company must do well to compete?

These are only a few of the questions you should be asking. I encourage you to find your own meaning in the data and to think about the broader impact it has on your marketing strategy and site experience.

Take action

Congratulations! You’ve made it this far and now have a newfound grasp on the competitive landscape, and perhaps you’ve gained a few insights that will effect positive change for your business.

Take what you’ve learned, package it, and share it with other teams at your company. New sets of eyes on the data might shine light on details or implications you overlooked.

By 

Sourced from Marketing Land

Keep this in mind if you are marketing sexy products.

By MediaStreet Staff Writers

What does a company that makes sex products do for their annual Valentine’s sales push? They do a survey, to find out how best to market to their customers. And here are the results.

Valentine’s Day, it seems, is starting to suck for everyone. Singles have made it their own anti-holiday, full of memes and proclamations about the commercialisation of the day. But what about couples? Is it all it’s really cracked up to be?

A company called K-Y undertook a survey to find out how to best market their sex products to customers. And it makes for depressing reading. What was once thought to be a romantic and sexy day has become an experience full of pressure and hype. Pressure to buy the right card, pick the sexiest lingerie and have the most mind-blowing sex of your life – and you only have one day to make it all happen.

According to the Love All 365 survey, half of Millennials feel they are missing out if they don’t have sex on Valentine’s Day, but more than 60% of them report that the sex doesn’t live up to the hype. That’s a lot of lead up for a big letdown.

The survey further illuminates the Valentine’s Day tension by revealing that while 82% of people are more likely to have sex with their partner on Valentine’s Day, 83% report that sex is best when it’s impulsive versus planned. Preparing for sex at Valentine’s Day is certainly a faux pas many couples are guilty of committing in spite of the fact that, as the statistics affirm, our preference is for spontaneity.

The good news is that 97% of couples report that having good sex with their partners makes them feel more connected.

“We don’t want couples saving their ‘sexy’ for special occasions, when great sex can and should happen any day of the year,” said Nadja Korner, Marketing Director of K-Y. “Good sex helps strengthen the relationship, so instead of putting all your romantic energy into nights like Valentine’s Day, surprise your partner with that special sexy something on an unexpected night. After all, the essence of pleasure is spontaneity.”

So if you are creating an advertising campaign using a sexy theme, keep the idea of spontaneous sex in mind. Especially if you are targeting Millennials. ■

 

Have you listed your company in our Media Directory? Click here to do it now.

Academics have identified four distinct personas of social media user that teenagers describe as shaping how they behave on social media.

By MediaStreet Staff Writers

Young social media users are categorised as either acting like the Geek, the Internet Celebrity, the Victim or the Lurker depending on their levels of online activity and visibility, University of Sussex academics say.

The categorisations are based on interviews the researchers conducted with children aged between 10 and 15-years-old for a new book, Researching Everyday Childhoods, published by Bloomsbury last month.

The interviews revealed many youngsters were increasingly savvy about maintaining their privacy online, often being motivated to protect themselves by unpleasant past personal experiences or negative incidents that affected classmates.

Dr Liam Berriman, lecturer in digital humanities at the University of Sussex, said: “Our research found that concerns about staying safe online created an atmosphere of intense anxiety for young people, even if they had not directly experienced any problems themselves. The young people we spoke to felt a great weight of responsibility for their safety online and were often motivated by the concern of being labelled a victim.”

“While there has been a lot of negative media coverage around teenagers’ interaction with social media, our findings are more hopeful that teenagers are responsible users of social media, are very conscious of the dangers and make considerable efforts to protect themselves against those risks.”

Teenagers navigate between the desire to be praised and recognised online and anxieties over the risk of opening themselves up to criticism and trolling. Among the four personas is the Internet Celebrity who is able to best use the latest trends and increasingly values “visibility of the self” through Instagram, Snapchat, the selfie and YouTube vlogging.

The internet celebrity

But academics also identified how young people are experimenting with and enjoying invisibility online. They describe the Lurker as someone able to avoid peer dramas arising through platforms such as Facebook, whilst still engaging in fun peer activities such as stalking their favourite music bands online.

The lurker

The Geek, meanwhile, uses invisibility to anonymously share and promote their amateur media creations online, such as music videos or fan fiction writing. The academics described how the Geeks’ long hours of labour on projects risked parental concern that their behaviour was obsessive or addictive.

The geek

Professor Rachel Thomson, professor of childhood and youth studies at the University of Sussex, said, “What is distinctive about these active social media users was the entrepreneurial character of their practice, with ‘play’ re-envisaged as a form of economically rewarding work. By gaining an audience, young people are aware that they could capture advertising and corporate sponsorship. The dream is to ‘go viral’, establishing a career as a cultural creator.”

The research also highlights the risks contained in a world dominated by personal visibility with the Victim left to suffer personal exposure and shame following the creation and display of intimate material such as sexting and the loss of control of this material.

The victim

The Victim’s high visibility is often out of their control with their presence and heightened without their consent as private material is extracted from them and exchanged under false premises.

This can vary from the frustration of being tagged in photographs and the creation of an unflattering digital footprint through the activities of others to the more invasive techniques of fraping, where a person’s online identity is hijacked without their permission, or sharing of intimate photographs.

Dr Berriman said, “These examples reveal the impossibility of non- participation in the world of social media. A teenager does not necessarily have to create an online persona, it is something that can be created by others.”

This is great food for thought for anyone trying to catch the attention of teenagers online. You may even need to consider four different approaches when targeting the teen market. Thanks, science!

 

Have you listed your company in our Media Directory? Click here to do it now.