Author

editor

Browsing

By Aaron Baar

The grocery delivery platform is the first retail media partner to enable targeting and end-to-end measurement directly within TikTok’s ad platform.

Dive Brief: 

  • Instacart is collaborating with TikTok on a program that will integrate the company’s retail media network data into the platform’s Ads Manager, the companies announced in a press release.
  • Select CPG advertisers soon will be able to use Instacart data for targeting and measurement, and to enhance their shoppable ad formats. Instacart is integrating its purchase and grocery selection data directly into TikTok Ad Manager.
  • The integration makes Instacart the first retail media network to offer marketers end-to-end capabilities natively on TikTok, according to release details. The move follows other recent efforts from Instacart designed to boost its appeal to advertisers.

Dive Insight:

With the TikTok integration, Instacart aims to establish itself as the most advertiser-friendly media network, providing its data to help brands reach new and motivated audiences with minimal friction. While other retail media networks have worked with TikTok on specific campaigns, Instacart is “the first to work with Tiktok [on] what we’re calling an end-to-end integration,” Ali Miller, Instacart’s general manager of advertising, told Adweek.

That means advertisers will soon be able to use Instacart’s audience segments to better target campaigns on TikTok’s platform to reach consumers with high purchase intent. Additionally, they will be able to enhance shoppable formats through TikTok’s Smart+ campaigns, which are integrated with Instacart grocery selection data. Advertisers will also be able to measure campaign and conversion performance through a closed-loop platform.

Instacart claims to have more than 7,500 active brands and 1,800 retail partners in its ecosystem, giving it a robust pool of data for its retail media network. The TikTok partnership is part of the company’s strategy to help marketers cut through fragmentation and complexity by allowing them to tap into Instacart’s retail media data wherever they’re already buying media, per release details.

Beyond its latest move, Instacart recently announced a partnership with Pinterest to make ads on the platform shoppable via the grocery delivery service. The company also expanded its partnership with The Trade Desk to integrate its grocery selection data on the programmatic company’s platform, enabling advertisers and agencies to use specific criteria to build first-party custom audiences.

By Aaron Baar

Sourced from MarketingDive

By Mark Ritson

New ads for ChatGPT scored low on fluency—and even lower on branding basics

OpenAI’s recent ads for ChatGPT were everywhere—NFL Primetime, streaming platforms, outdoor, and beyond. Press coverage hailed the AI company’s biggest marketing push yet as a new chapter of AI brand building.

But few pointed out just how incredibly poor the ads were.

Set aside the irony of an AI company relying on traditional media to promote its product. Focus instead on the dire creative quality of the two TV spots, Pull-Up and Dish.

Research firm System1 tested both ads with a representative panel of U.S. consumers. The results confirm that while AI tech bros continue to kill it with product development, they’re lightyears behind on the rest of the marketing challenge.

Both ranked in the lowest quintile for long-term growth and short-term sales impact. That’s incredibly bad, even for the tech category, which always underperforms.

Worse, both scored dismally on fluency—System1’s measure of whether consumers actually know which brand is being advertised to them.

Source: System1 FluencyTrace real time testing of “Pull-Up”

The Pull-Up ad managed a fantastically bad fluency score of 59. That means only 59% of viewers–who were being paid to watch the ad with their full attention–knew what was being advertised. In System1’s real-time assessment above, you can see a black ocean of ignorance engulfing the audience. A disappointingly small hump of pink recognition kicks in two seconds before the end, when ChatGPT’s logo appears.

This is the definition of bad advertising, standing in rude contrast to the sea of pink when KFC or Apple or Mars ads are tested.

Source: System1 FluencyTrace real time testing of Twix “Two Bears” Ad

And that’s just real-time fluency, not the tougher and more important metric of branded recall among unpaid, inattentive audiences with a memory-shredding delay before being quizzed. Most studies conclude that just around half of all advertising achieves branded recall.

Now back to the killer ratio: half of the ads aired in America can’t even communicate what product they are selling.

There’s a simple explanation: Most marketers are too involved in their product. Most agencies are too interested in their storytelling. Both miss market orientation.

They don’t realize that consumers don’t care about their product, don’t focus on advertising, and have a bazillion more important things to think about. This total lack of involvement contrasts directly with professionals spending eight hours a day fixated on one brand and a thirty-second masterpiece. We make ads in exact inversion to how they’re consumed.

Bad advertisers assume a single whiff of a logo at the end is enough—like a Hitchcock movie revealing its triumphant conclusion in the final frames. Brands with a more advanced grasp of effectiveness know better. They use distinctive assets from the outset to ensure immediate recognition at the start, throughout, and after. They squeeze value from every pixel they paid for.

Andrew Tindall’s “Rule of 7” is instructive here. His analysis of a giant Effie database suggests a brand needs seven distinctive assets in a thirty-second ad to achieve 100% branded recall. Not seven different assets—just seven repetitions of the colours, shapes, and other elements in your asset palette. And no, that doesn’t limit creativity. It challenges it to work harder toward its true purpose: advertising effect and sales.

Achieving branded recall and maintaining distinctiveness is crucial for all brands. But it’s especially critical for AI brands like ChatGPT, which are incredibly generic. They all look the same, operate the same, work off each other, launch innumerable product iterations, and fall blandly into a big, grey AI bucket.

While AI awareness is near-universal among Americans, most people don’t see any difference between AI providers. Menlo Ventures found that “most people don’t distinguish between older assistants like Alexa and Siri and newer large language models like ChatGPT and Claude. It’s all the same.” I don’t know which AI models I’m currently subscribed to. Do you?

Distinctiveness will be crucial in the next chapter of AI. There are too many competing brands. The two or three that survive won’t necessarily carve a differentiated position, but they’ll come to mind first by standing out. The route to that escape starts with making ads that don’t score a 59 for fluency.

Perhaps the geniuses at OpenAI should have asked their own chatbot for advice. When I did exactly that yesterday, ChatGPT—unlike the company behind it—played it perfectly:

Prompt: Assess the new Pull-Up ad from ChatGPT against the laws of advertising effectiveness and score it out of 10.

ChatGPT-5: Pull-Up is strategically on-brief and nicely made, but it underweights distinctive assets and mid-ad branding, so it risks becoming a likeable, generic “AI-helped me” story rather than a memorable ChatGPT ad that builds future sales.

Score: 5/10

Mark Ritson is a former marketing professor, brand consultant and award winning columnist. He is the founder of the MiniMBA in Marketing, which teaches all the many laws of advertising effectiveness as part of its outstanding syllabus. 

By Mark Ritson

Mark Ritson has a PhD in Marketing and spent 25 years working as a marketing professor, and has also worked as both a global brand consultant and as the in-house brand consultant for LVMH. His articles have appeared in the Sloan Management Review, Harvard Business Review, the Journal of Advertising and the Journal of Consumer Research.

Sourced from adweek

Sourced from what’s trending

Summary:

  • Have you ever added items to your cart due to bonus offers? It’s a deliberate marketing strategy. Temu gamifies shopping.
  • Gamification in online shopping uses casino-style tactics to push buyers into purchasing more products. Variable rewards drive consumer behaviour.
  • Learn 5 ways to outsmart gamified marketing. Understand the illusion of savings and avoid impulse purchases. Take back control.

Have you ever found yourself adding items to your cart just because of a bonus offer you stumbled across? That wasn’t an accident. It’s a deliberate and highly successful marketing strategy.

Internet bazaars like Temu have gone through the roof in popularity as much for their apparently unbeatable prices as because of how they gamify shopping. One of their flashiest attractions is the promise of “big bonus discounts.” Their casino-style mechanisms that give users discounts, vouchers, or credits, at first glance seem to be a nice bonus. In fact, they are a quiet but powerful tactic to push buyers into putting more products into their baskets.

How Gamification Works in Online Shopping

Gamification—the application of game elements in a non-game environment—has become a routine strategy in online marketing. Fitness apps reward users with badges, banks give streak rewards, and e-learning sites provide points.

In the retail environment, however, gamification has special potency because it relates directly to expenditure. Temu and similar apps incorporate “prize wheel” into the user experience to simulate the thrill of the slot machine, providing an opportunity to “win” coupons, further discounts, or even free shipping. This is a tactic borrowed from the online gaming world, where free spins are popular form of casino bonus.

Every spin is a small win. Even a small reward—such as a few dollars taken off or a percentage discount—instils a sense of urgency. Consumers feel they have “earned” a prize and are motivated to use it before it runs out, which makes them purchase goods they otherwise would not have.

The Illusion of Savings: Understanding “Cart Creep”

Spin-the-wheel offers present discounts in the guise of fortune, redirecting consumers from considering need to grabbing a “prize.” Coupons usually come with minimum spends that encourage individuals to put more into their carts.

Hooked by Habit

Temu’s free spins aren’t a novelty that happens just once. They are replenished every day, often several times a day, entering a pattern of habit-based use. Even if consumers don’t intend to make a purchase, the temptation of a free spin lures them back into the app, where new items and lightning sales beckon.

This behaviour is based on behavioural economics. The variable reward—the thrill of not knowing what you’ll get—creates an exciting experience for the user. This unpredictability causes dopamine release in the brain, which gets the behaviour reinforced. Every spin not only keeps the app front of mind but also keeps the shopper pre-primed to buy something whenever they look at a “good deal.”

Shoppers often start with one or two items but end up with a full basket—a phenomenon dubbed “cart creep.” Spin-the-wheel deals push buyers to add more turning a $20 plan into a $65checkout. Similar tactics such as mystery boxes and lucky draws are used in flash sale sites to keep customers engaged. This is the same reason for the viral popularity of Labubu’s blind box strategy.

5 Ways to Outsmart Gamified Marketing

Getting to know these strategies is the most important step in shopping smart. Useful tips are:

Pause before spinning. Ask yourself whether you were going to purchase something prior to the offer. If not, then you’re likely being enticed by the game.

Read the fine print. Coupons mostly come with minimum spends or expire after hours, which promotes impulse purchasing.

Make a list. Hold yourself to things you really need rather than wandering through aimlessly to “spend” your prize.

Estimate actual savings. A 20% discount on something you don’t need isn’t saving money—it’s spending money.

Take advantage of a cooling-off period. If you find yourself vulnerable to a spin reward, wait a few hours before checking out. The rush will wear off, making rational decisions easier.

By treating “free spins” as a marketing strategy instead of an actual bonanza, you take back control over your shopping.

The Bottom Line

By combining entertainment and commerce, sites such as Temu have gamified online shopping. Spins for free and surprise rewards make it seem as though everyone triumphs. But in the end, the winner is usually the site itself, as it gains more engagement and bigger cart sizes.

Consumers aren’t hopeless, however. Learning how these strategies operate enables you think twice and not succumb to the trap of wastefulness.

Feature image credit: appshunter.io on Unsplash

Sourced from what’s trending

By Zak Doffman

Updated, Oct. 21 with an industry response to Google’s retreat on user privacy.

Apple warns iPhone users to stop using Google Chrome, and Microsoft has issued the same warning for Windows users. Now Google has confirmed more bad news for Chrome’s more than 3 billion users. Is it time to quit the world’s most popular browser?

Google’s plan to kill tracking cookies in Chrome centred on its Privacy Sandbox. This explored alternatives to cookies, seeking a balance between user privacy, the ad industry and regulators. That balance was never found. The focus on privacy is over.

Google has suddenly confirmed privacy initiatives “are being phased out.” The Privacy Sandbox, now in its sixth year, has essentially ended just months after Google confirmed tracking is here to stay and there are no viable alternatives.

The scale of this reversal is huge. “Google’s Privacy Sandbox is officially dead,” AdWeek reports, with Google telling the industry outlet “the entire project is being retired.”

The Privacy Sandbox has been fraught with issues since its inception. Its first initiative, the so-called Federated Learning of Cohorts (FLoC) was infamously pilloried by Apple’s “Flock” remake of Hitchcock’s “The Birds,” promoting Safari at Chrome’s expense.

The list of initiatives now retiring “in light of their low levels of adoption,” include: Attribution Reporting API, IP Protection, On-Device Personalization, Private Aggregation, Protected Audience, Protected App Signals, Related Website Sets, SelectURL, SDK Runtime and Topics. In short, pretty much everything.

Responses to Google’s confirmation that the Privacy Sandbox is essentially dead have been are stark. Per Gizmodo, “Google just quietly killed something you may never have used or heard of: Privacy Sandbox. You should grieve this death anyway, because the implications are grim. This basically means six years’ worth of work toward ending third-party cookies in Chrome—which might have ultimately made cookies obsolete across all major browsers — has amounted to nothing.”

PPC Land says “Chrome kills most Privacy Sandbox technologies after adoption fails. Google retires nine Privacy Sandbox APIs following years of development, low uptake, and widespread industry criticism of the cookie replacement initiative.”

“Google has killed Privacy Sandbox,” Engadget says.

The irony for privacy advocates is that none of the negative headlines in the last two years — including stay of execution for tracking cookies and rebirth of digital fingerprinting — have dented Chrome’s dominance on mobile or desktops.

Chrome now has more than 70% of both the mobile and desktop global markets. The only threat on the horizon comes from new AI browsers, including Perplexity’s Comet and an eagerly anticipated option from Open AI.

There again, Google is rushing out advanced to maintain its lock, with its recent Gemini in Chrome upgrade designed to keep the upstart AI browsers at bay. Again, privacy warnings have already been issued, with Gemini harvesting more user data than the alternatives. But, again, it seems unlikely to make a difference to user adoption.

That said, Gizmodo warns “with Privacy Sandbox completely gone, it’s clear that somewhere along the line, the long deferred plan fizzled. Individual tracking of users is a load-bearing structure of the free, ad-supported internet, and that’s not about to change.” And when it comes to Google’s stewardship of the global internet, perhaps that’s the most surprisingly unsurprising news of all.

If there’s a root cause behind the death of Google’s Privacy Sandbox, it’s the tech giant’s precarious balancing act. It plays both game-keeper by safeguarding user privacy interests, and poacher, as the primary beneficiary from the digital ad industry it created.

Ultimately, the industry feared that killing cookies would benefit Google through its unique insider position at their expense, where on every level, any replacement for tracking cookies would water down their ability to track users across the web.

But for the industry we’re possibly now more in an uneasy limbo-land than a settled, long term solution for the privacy versus tracking tension that dominates big tech. Per Search Engine Land, “Google’s shutdown of Privacy Sandbox ends cookie chaos for now but leaves the future of privacy-first advertising uncertain.”

The ad industry-focused website says “the Privacy Sandbox was Google’s answer to growing privacy regulation and industry backlash against cross-site tracking — but its complexity, limited adoption, and regulatory scrutiny stalled momentum. At last, Google is no longer forcing a shift away from third-party cookies, preserving the familiar targeting and measurement tools that power much of digital advertising.”

But this comes with a warning: “While this offers short-term stability and fewer disruptions to campaign performance, it also signals that true privacy-safe ad solutions are still unresolved, leaving the industry without a clear path forward as regulators and browsers continue tightening data rules. In short — advertisers get breathing room today, but more uncertainty tomorrow.”

It’s no easier now to work through what happens longer term than it was six years ago, when the demise of tracking cookies was promised and Privacy Sandbox was born. This has proven an impossible problem to reconcile. The disappointment now is that users have paid the price for a schism at the heart of the online ad ecosystem.

You are being tracked on the browser most of you use, despite a promise that would stop. And there’s now no end in sight. Ultimately, perhaps that’s all that matters. And it comes as AI browsers are set to disrupt the entire ecosystem like never before.

Feature image credit: dpa/picture alliance via Getty Images

By Zak Doffman

Find Zak Doffman on LinkedIn and X.

Sourced from Forbes

By Dax Dasilva • Edited by Micah Zimmerman 

What consumers need from physical stores — and how retailers can rise to meet it — is evolving fast.

Key Takeaways

  • Shoppers don’t crave human interaction — they value expertise, efficiency and immediate product availability.
  • Retailers must leverage technology to personalize experiences, streamline checkout and strengthen supply chain reliability.
  • Physical stores remain relevant by focusing on curation, expertise and delivering value beyond convenience.

Nothing beats the human touch of a helpful salesperson, right?

Wrong.

For so long, retailers have been told that what sets brick-and-mortar apart is the “human element.” But a landmark new survey shows exactly the opposite: roughly half of younger consumers prefer a shopping experience that lets them avoid other people. Convenience and efficiency loom large here: more than three-quarters of Gen Z and millennial shoppers regularly choose online purchases and curbside or in-store pickup.

All of which raises the existential question: Why do we even have stores anymore, anyway?

The answer isn’t quite as bleak as it might seem. Physical stores have always served a central need for shoppers, and I don’t see that changing. But exactly what that need is — and how retailers can rise to meet it — is evolving fast.

Why retailers can’t count on the human element

First, though, when and why did human interaction become kryptonite for shoppers?

No surprises here: Covid was the accelerant, creating a wealth of possibilities for buying stuff with minimal human contact. On top of already abundant e-commerce options, we suddenly had new curbside pickup and delivery choices.

Throw in new norms for remote working, and that meant never having to chit-chat with anyone IRL.

Of course, the whole IRL thing was already on its way out, anyway. Today, nearly half of teens are constantly online, and 40% of Gen Z say they’re more comfortable communicating digitally than in person. For better or worse, digital interaction has become the predominant way we engage with the world.

All of that adds up to a major challenge for today’s brick-and-mortar retailers: How do you get shoppers in-store who don’t want to leave the house?

The answer requires not so much rethinking as remembering the role that stores play. After all, about 80% of transactions still take place in-store.

That’s not because of some touchy-feely human element — cheesy greeters, schmoozy salespeople, chatty checkout clerks — and it never was. It comes down to adding value, something that not just young shoppers but all shoppers prioritize.

The act of shopping in-store represents an exceptionally efficient way to browse, try, compare and learn. Smart retailers are increasingly leaning into those advantages, and they’re leveraging tech to do it — finding ways to personalize, customize and streamline the in-store experience for digitally native younger shoppers.

Here’s what I’ve seen working on the front lines with thousands of merchants around the world.

Expertise still matters

Small talk and schmoozing may be out. But genuine expertise is always in demand. And there’s arguably no substitute for speaking with an expert staff member who offers personalized service.

A couple of summers ago, in my hometown of Montreal, I bought a bike at Rebicycle, which assembles its rides from recycled components. For newbies, there’s a lot to learn about putting all of those pieces together, from the perfect seat to the right brakes to the ideal tire width. Talking to an expert in-store helped me reach the right decision in minutes… instead of hours searching online.

If Gen Z and Millennial shoppers are all about efficiency, it really doesn’t get much better. Even an AI chatbot can’t compete with a seasoned staff member who knows you, knows the merchandise and knows the stock.

Retailers are increasingly turning to tech to enhance this kind of in-store expertise. New apps, for example, turn any handheld device into a repository of product knowledge, letting staff of all experience levels easily share specs, insights and availability with customers.

The right stock is everything

Physicality and immediacy are two big things stores have going for them. You can physically try out what you’re looking for. And you can take it home immediately, right then and there. Even Amazon can’t top that.

But only if it’s in stock.

There’s nothing more frustrating than traipsing to a store, only to find something sold out (like that soy candle from my favourite downtown boutique — c’mon, guys, your site said two available!).

When it comes to stock, younger shoppers are especially antsy. Rather than wait for an item to be restocked, they’re willing to spend more to get it right away from another merchant.

So, how can retailers ensure they’ve got the right merchandise at the right time?

Seasonality forecasting is critical — i.e., making sure there’s enough stock during busy seasons and not too much at other times. To stock their stores, many retailers still rely on forecasting models that only tap recent sales data — or just go on gut instinct. That can leave them with empty shelves at the most important times of year. New tools remove the guesswork, drawing on historical sales trends to make order recommendations for seasonal products.

Supply chains are another pinch point — especially with tariffs wreaking havoc on inventories everywhere. Big merchants typically have access to alternate suppliers who can fill the gaps, but for smaller retailers, one hiccup can spell disaster. The good news is that new platforms are democratizing supply chain access, giving smaller stores access to the same vast global sourcing network as major retailers.

Avoid the bad checkout buzz kill

In a world where shoppers demand efficiency, checkout is an overlooked chance for brick-and-mortar retailers to set themselves apart.

For nine out of 10 consumers, a smooth checkout plays a major role in whether or not they return to a retailer. And eight out of 10 will avoid a business with a line-up, with 40% of that group either heading to a competitor or simply abandoning their purchase.

Self check-out to the rescue? Nope.

Unsurprisingly, two-thirds of consumers say they’ve used a dysfunctional self-service kiosk. Clunky tech is costing retailers money, too: 15% of shoppers admit using self-checkout to steal, and almost half of those folks plan to do it again.

A better way? I’m seeing more retailers arm their salespeople with handheld POS devices, capable of tabulating a customer’s order and even checking out, on the go. Not rocket science, but surprisingly effective.

An added advantage here: personalization. The latest tools can call up customer histories and preferences, enabling salespeople to offer additive suggestions or flag sale items… instead of just going for the hard sell. For a generation primed on online algorithms and recommendations, this feels second nature.

Shoppers’ preferences around human interaction in stores may wax and wane. One person’s friendly clerk might be another’s pushy salesperson. But ultimately, everyone — young or old — is seeking value in their in-store experience. Smart retailers know that personalization, curation and efficiency never go out of style.

By Dax Dasilva 

Dax Dasilva is the CEO and founder of Lightspeed Commerce, the unified POS and payments platform for ambitious entrepreneurs. He is also the founder of Age of Union, an environmental alliance that has invested $40 million in protecting critical species and ecosystems.

Edited by Micah Zimmerman 

Sourced from Entrepreneur

By Hannah Bowler,

Ogilvy UK will no longer work with influencers who distort or retouch their bodies or faces for brand campaigns in a bid to combat social media’s “systemic” mental health harms.

Dove already doesn’t work with influencers that edit content.

Speaking exclusively to The Drum, Ogilvy’s head of influence Rahul Titus said influencer marketing is “supposed to be the authentic side to marketing, but now it churns out such staged content that is so harmful to anybody looking at social media”.

Ogilvy’s policy comes as the UK government reviews the Digitally Altered Body Image Bill that would require an influencer to disclose edited content. The bill is on its second review in parliament but is struggling to make it through the proposal process. Titus hopes Ogilvy’s commitment to stop working with influencers who alter their images will help the bill get passed.

“We have a duty of care as marketers, as agencies and brands to the next generation of people so they don’t grow up with the same stuff we are seeing now,” says Titus.

He acknowledges that brands have “dipped their toes” in unedited influencer images, but they always fall back on running misguided anti-editing campaigns rather than implementing sweeping change.

“A lot of research has gone into this. We’ve been working with our behavioural sciences team and talking to a lot of influencers and we’ve spent a lot of time figuring out how to make it work.”

The ban applies to all parts of the Ogilvy UK group, which counts the likes of Dove among its clients. Dove’s global vice president external communications and sustainability, Firdaous El Honsali, came out in support of the policy. “We are delighted to see our partner Ogilvy tackling this topic. Dove only works with influencers that do not distort their appearance on social media – and together with Ogilvy and our community of influencers, we have created several campaigns that celebrate no digital distortion,” El Honsali says.

Ogilvy will roll out the policy in two phases. Starting next month, Titus’s team will be consulting with brands and influencers on the policy, and in May it will implement the ban. Titus has set a December deadline for a complete end to the editing of all sponsored or paid-for content in influencer activations.

“It’s easy for us to sit here and say ’there is a systemic issue, so we aren’t going to work with these types of influencers,’ but that’s not the solution and it won’t make the change we want to see. So we are going to take the time and consult our clients and put the plan in place.”

How will it work in practice?

  • Ogilvy will no longer work with influencers who retouch their skin or bodies, but will allow work that edits the contrast or brightness. The ASA’s beauty filter standards will be enforced in the UK.
  • Ogilvy will use its InfluenceO tech stack to detect when images have been retouched.
  • Briefs will be made more flexible to allow for more authenticity from the start. Titus says: “We need to educate our clients to give influencers the freedom to express themselves a little bit more.”

Ogilvy also expects its quarterly diversity audits, put in place in 2020, will serve a secondary purpose of improving influencer diversity and, over time, naturally start working with less edited Influencers. “We are hoping that by improving influencer diversity, the type of influencers that brands work with will change to be more representative of the population.”

Titus is realistic that the policy will need time and for the rest of the industry to get behind the ban. “We are talking about reversing 10 years of social media behaviour and that’s not going to happen in two months. We know that what we are putting in place we will not see any immediate benefits for the next five years. It’s too big a project and that’s OK.”

Ogilvy hopes the policy will “set off a chain reaction” in the industry and Titus urges other members of the influencer marketing industry to approach him for a briefing. “It’s absolutely the right thing to do and we want to be the agency that puts the foundational parts in place so that other agencies can follow.

“Clients want it, the industry wants it, influencers are generally happy with it – so why haven’t we done this before?”

By Hannah Bowler,

Sourced from The Drum

By

Imagine waking up one day to find that every click, search, and purchase you’ve made online has been carefully catalogued, not just by corporations but by anyone with the means to access it. It’s not paranoia; it’s reality. In a world where your digital footprint is currency, being untraceable is no longer just a preference, it’s a necessity for those who value their privacy. Whether you’re concerned about data breaches, targeted ads that seem to read your mind, or simply the idea of being constantly monitored, the ability to disappear online is a skill that feels more urgent than ever. But how do you take back control in a system designed to track your every move?

This guide, created by Proton, offers a step-by-step guide to reclaiming your privacy and reducing your online traceability. You’ll learn how to limit corporate surveillance, minimize tracking from smart devices, and even compartmentalize your digital identity to shield yourself from prying eyes. For those seeking the ultimate escape, it explores the possibility of complete anonymity, though not without its sacrifices. Each method is designed to empower you, balancing practicality with the level of privacy you desire. Whether you’re looking to protect sensitive information or vanish entirely, this guide will challenge you to rethink how you navigate the digital world. After all, in an age of constant surveillance, how much of your life do you truly own?

Reduce Your Digital Footprint

Key Takeaways :

  • Use ad blockers, privacy-focused browsers, and extensions like Privacy Badger to limit corporate surveillance and enhance online privacy.
  • Minimize smart device tracking by disabling Wi-Fi and Bluetooth when not in use and consider advanced tools like Pi-hole for network-level protection.
  • Compartmentalize your digital identity by using separate email accounts, phone numbers, and payment methods for different activities, supported by password managers for organization.
  • Protect personal information in public records by using legal entities, decoy addresses, and regular audits to reduce exposure to unwanted scrutiny.
  • Pursue complete anonymity by avoiding traceable devices, using cash or privacy-focused cryptocurrencies, and adopting a non-digital lifestyle if necessary.

1: Limit Corporate Surveillance

Corporations rely heavily on tracking your online behaviour to create detailed profiles for advertising, pricing strategies, and other purposes. To counter this, begin by using ad blockers. These tools prevent intrusive ads and tracking scripts from monitoring your activity across websites. While effective, some websites may restrict access or functionality if they detect an ad blocker in use.

For enhanced protection, switch to privacy-focused browsers like Brave or Firefox, which block third-party cookies and prevent browser fingerprinting. Additionally, consider installing extensions such as Privacy Badger or uBlock Origin to further reduce tracking. These measures may require slight adjustments to your browsing habits, as certain websites might not function optimally. However, the trade-off is a significantly more private online experience, allowing you to browse with greater peace of mind.

2: Minimize Smart Device Tracking

Smart devices, including smartphones, smart speakers, and connected appliances, are designed to collect and transmit data. To reduce this, start by disabling Wi-Fi and Bluetooth when they are not in use. This simple yet effective step prevents your devices from passively sharing information with nearby networks or devices.

For more advanced protection, consider implementing tools like Pi-hole, which blocks unwanted data transmission at the network level. While highly effective, setting up and maintaining such tools can be technically demanding. Additionally, disabling certain tracking features on smart devices may limit their functionality. Evaluate whether these trade-offs align with your privacy priorities, and adjust your approach accordingly.

How to Disappear Online & Become Untraceable

 

Check out more relevant guides from our extensive collection on digital privacy that you might find useful.

3: Compartmentalize Your Digital Identity

Separating your digital identity into distinct compartments can significantly enhance your privacy. This involves using different email accounts, phone numbers, and payment methods for various aspects of your life, such as work, personal activities, and online shopping. By compartmentalizing your digital presence, you reduce the risk of a single data breach exposing all your information.

While this strategy is effective, it requires careful organization and discipline. Managing multiple accounts and credentials can be time-consuming, but the added security is invaluable for those committed to protecting their privacy. Tools like password managers can simplify this process by securely storing and organizing your login information, making sure that your digital compartments remain distinct and manageable.

4: Remove Public Records and Paper Trails

Public records, such as property ownership and voter registration, can reveal sensitive information like your home address. To obscure these details, consider using legal entities, such as trusts or corporations, to hold assets or manage financial accounts. This approach helps shield your personal information from public view.

Another effective strategy is to establish a decoy address for official purposes, such as a P.O. box or a mail forwarding service. This can help mask your actual location while still allowing you to receive important correspondence. Regularly auditing your privacy measures is also essential. Hiring professionals to identify vulnerabilities in your setup can help you address weaknesses before they are exploited. While these steps require time and effort, they provide a robust defence against unwanted scrutiny.

5: Pursue Complete Anonymity

For those seeking the highest level of privacy, adopting a non-digital lifestyle may be necessary. This involves avoiding traceable devices, such as smartphones, modern vehicles, and smart home systems. Instead, rely on analogue tools and non-digital alternatives to minimize your exposure to tracking.

When identification is required, consider using passports instead of driver’s licenses, as they do not disclose your residential address. Additionally, avoid using credit cards or other traceable payment methods, opting instead for cash or cryptocurrencies that prioritize anonymity. Achieving complete anonymity demands significant lifestyle changes and constant vigilance. You may need to forgo many conveniences of modern life, including online services and connected devices. While this level of privacy is not practical for everyone, it remains an option for those with the dedication and resources to pursue it.

Taking Control of Your Digital Presence

Disappearing online and protecting your privacy is a challenging yet attainable goal. By implementing these steps, you can progressively reduce your digital footprint while balancing convenience and security. Whether your aim is to limit corporate surveillance or achieve complete anonymity, the process is deeply personal and depends on your specific needs and comfort level. Each action you take brings you closer to reclaiming control over your digital presence, empowering you to navigate the online world on your terms.

Media Credit: Proton

By

Sourced from Geeky Gadgets

By Dr. Diane Hamilton,

You might have noticed AI at the top of Google’s search page, but that might not be enough to compete with ChatGPT’s latest offering. For now, it is only available for Mac, but OpenAI has launched a browser called ChatGPT Atlas that searches, summarizes, and answers all your questions in one place. ChatGPT Atlas looks more like a traditional browser, complete with tabs and favourites. You can visit any site, ask questions about what you’re seeing, and get answers in real time without leaving the page. These changes can impact how major organizations like Google, LinkedIn, and Amazon operate. The question every major platform is asking is how to stay relevant when AI becomes the main hub for users. I discussed this with New York Times bestselling author, Seth Godin. Seth said AI is the biggest shift since electricity, calling it the final step in the capitalist drive to remove skill from workers and embed it in systems. He added that the alternative to being replaced is to use AI for small tasks while elevating our role to innovator, project manager, or visionary.

What Can Google Do To Compete With ChatGPT Atlas

Google built its success on ads tied to search traffic. When users click links, Google earns revenue. If ChatGPT Atlas gives people what they want without leaving the page, those clicks go away. Google has tried to stay ahead by adding AI-generated summaries at the top of its results, but the larger challenge is finding a way to keep advertisers interested when fewer people are viewing or clicking links. Seth said Google “stumbled into a miracle” with its advertising model because people actually wanted ads like classifieds, but warned that model cannot be repeated. He believes ChatGPT cannot serve both advertisers and users without losing trust, just as Twitter failed when it chased ad revenue at the expense of experience.

For now, ChatGPT Atlas does not run ads, but that could change. If OpenAI eventually introduces paid placements, it could reshape the entire ad industry. Instead of buying keywords, advertisers might pay to have their product or service mentioned in an AI-generated answer. That could work only if people trust those answers. If users suspect bias or manipulation, they will lose confidence quickly.

Google has one major advantage: habit. Billions of people already use Google every day, and that brand loyalty is powerful. To compete, Google can build deeper integrations between its AI products and its other services. That means creating value through data, analytics, and productivity tools that make Google indispensable in everyday life.

What Can LinkedIn Do To Compete With ChatGPT Atlas

LinkedIn faces a different challenge. It already uses AI to help people write posts, apply for jobs, and analyse their professional networks. But users are starting to notice how repetitive AI-generated posts can feel. Many sound similar, polished but hollow, and that kind of content hurts engagement. Even AI-generated images are losing their novelty. Seth said LinkedIn’s algorithm shapes behaviour by rewarding certain posts, not necessarily better ideas. As people follow what the system rewards, it creates an ocean of sameness. Once the algorithm changes, users shift again, unaware of how it drives their actions.

If LinkedIn wants to compete with ChatGPT Atlas, it has to double down on human connection. The platform’s power comes from people wanting to be seen, to share achievements, and to prove they are ready for their next opportunity. AI can’t replace that desire for recognition.

One smart move would be to create short discussion threads that feature a single question and invite professionals to respond with their insights. For example, a thread could ask, “How would you handle a team that resists adopting new AI tools?” These would be shorter and livelier than traditional articles, giving people the chance to show how they think, not just what they know. The threads could be personalized to show up in their feed based on their level of experience or desire for future employment.

LinkedIn already invites experts to comment on major topics, but those responses are often longer articles. Quick threads could generate more interaction and show off the expertise of all users and not just experts. The problem would come from people asking ChatGPT or LinkedIn’s AI what a good response is. People need to trust that what they read is genuine. Seth warned that scammers are already scraping LinkedIn’s professional graph to impersonate trusted contacts, which makes authenticity even more critical for the platform’s future.

What Can Amazon Do To Compete With ChatGPT Atlas

Amazon’s business depends on people searching within its platform. If users start asking ChatGPT Atlas for the best product and Atlas can place that item directly into a shopping cart, Amazon could lose control over discovery on their own site. People might never search inside Amazon again.

That scenario creates both risk and opportunity. Amazon has the infrastructure, logistics, and trust that AI companies lack. It can focus on building partnerships that allow its catalogue to integrate seamlessly into AI-driven searches. If someone asks Atlas for a recommendation and it links directly to Amazon, both companies benefit. But if OpenAI creates its own purchasing system, that could be a real threat to Amazon’s dominance.

To stay ahead, Amazon needs to make its customer experience even more personal. The company already collects detailed data about buying habits. If it uses that data to enhance how people shop, by predicting what they will need or showing real human reviews that feel trustworthy, it can maintain its edge.

As Seth put it, innovation starts small. He said we don’t need giant leaps, just tiny choices that persuade us to act, like solving small problems creatively every day. Seth described these as ‘buffet problems’ which are the small inefficiencies anyone can fix right where they stand, like pulling the buffet table away from the wall to help people navigate the table better. He also said fear is natural in times of change but should be used as fuel for upskilling and creative problem-solving, since curiosity identifies the problem and creativity finds the least painful solution.

Could ChatGPT Atlas Become The Biggest Platform Of All

There is no question that ChatGPT Atlas represents a major shift in how people will use the internet. But it will not exist in a vacuum. Competitors like Claude are improving quickly, and NVIDIA’s investments in AI infrastructure are setting the stage for even more powerful systems. The question is whether Atlas will become the default way people access information or one of many tools in a growing ecosystem. The companies that thrive will be the ones that stay curious and adaptable. As Seth noted, cycles of creative destruction are speeding up, from forty years to ten, and that waiting for top-down permission to innovate means waiting forever. Those who act first, even in small ways, will shape what comes next.

Feature Image Credit: NurPhoto via Getty Images

By Dr. Diane Hamilton,

Find Dr. Diane Hamilton on LinkedIn and X. Visit Dr.’s website. Browse additional work.

Sourced from Forbes

By Jada Jones,

No ad budget? Try this tool – all you need is a URL to get started.

 

ZDNET’s key takeaways

  • Pomelli is an experiment from Google Labs and Google DeepMind.
  • It can create AI-generated ad campaigns for your business.
  • It’s only available in English in select countries.

Finding the budget, time, and resources to properly advertise as a small-to-medium-sized business (SMB) can be a daunting task. Pomelli, an AI experiment from Google Labs in collaboration with Google DeepMind, provides AI marketing tools to assist small businesses in creating social media campaigns.

Pomelli uses AI to create campaigns that are unique to your business; all you need to do is upload your business website to begin. Google says Pomelli uses your business URL to create a “Business DNA” that analyses your website images to identify brand identity. The Business DNA profile includes tone of voice, colour palettes, fonts, and pictures. Pomelli can also generate logos, taglines, and brand values.

After you’ve created a Business DNA, Pomelli generates ad campaign ideas. In a blog post, Google says this feature eliminates the laborious process of brainstorming unique ad campaigns. If users have their own campaign ideas, they can enter them into Pomelli as a prompt.

Finally, Pomelli will generate marketing assets for social media, websites, and advertisements. These assets can be edited, allowing users to change images, headers, fonts, colour palettes, descriptions, and create a call to action.

Pomelli is available as a public beta experiment in the US, Australia, Canada, and New Zealand in English only.

Similar products to try

Pomelli joins several recent releases from major tech companies that aim to use AI for advertising, including an AI agent from Amazon that makes ads start to finish. Adobe’s AI Foundry, released earlier this month, aims to manage copyright concerns by letting companies fine-tune Adobe image and video generation models with their own IP for a more personalized output.

Feature Image Credit: Screenshot by Jada Jones/ZDNET

By Jada Jones,

Sourced from ZD Net

By Rick Evans

These days, agencies act more like orchestrators of tech and creator access

A decade ago, I fought tooth and nail to gain a foothold in the advertising industry. I contacted the great-ish minds of our generation leading strategy at the legendary Madison Ave. shops and the new-fangled, tech-enabled experience studios. Handwritten letters rattled the bin without reply. Most emails went unanswered, save for a few generous folks who gleaned genuine interest in my request.
To those folks, I explained my interest—I am curious about people.

During a decade working brand-side marketing roles, I glimpsed what agency strategists got to do and I was jealous. One anecdote came from my time at a youth-focused travel company. As part of a project, I flew to London and trailed a few strategists from our agency for field research. We hit university pubs, buying students pints of cider and lager in exchange for travel stories and booking experiences.

Strategists sought a truth about humans, business and culture. While the world of advertising was already in flux, it still had some shine. It seemed a fitting way to use my journalism degree while making enough to not need more roommates than rooms in my apartment.

There were trips for some to industry confabs. At least once a week, we entertained a client with dinner and drinks or at least a stop at happy hour. I got to do plenty of research interviews. I even spent a few years working at iconic agencies in London, the birthplace of planning.

Today, I fear the industry is losing what made it home for misfits like myself—its focus on people.

Recently, a well-known CMO shared a screenshot on LinkedIn. In the midst of a publisher’s article was an ad. This ad looked nothing like the ads I wanted to help create. You can imagine it now. They are usually found at the bottom of articles on news websites. They feature a clickbait headline, an AI-generated image and a tiny disclosure line in a half-assed attempt to tell you what you’re seeing is an ad and not actual news.

Over the decade since I got into advertising, the share of ad revenue going to Meta, Amazon, Microsoft, Alphabet and TikTok has climbed rom 22 percent to 65 percent, per MoffettNathanson. Instead of the industry using its understanding of people to help these platforms create ad formats and creative that work through narrative and entertainment, agencies bent the knee. They reworked ideas to fit formats, ceded creation to influencers and accepted that somewhere between 5 and 50 percent of the users seeing an ad weren’t people, but bots. Unsurprisingly, the percentage of humans who find advertising annoying has also climbed.

A recent report from Forrester predicts that, “As creators take on more ideation and production responsibilities, creative agencies will act more like orchestrators of tech and creator access.”

Times change and culture shifts. I’m not naïve enough to see this prediction as a surprise nor stubborn enough to grasp at the vestiges of the industry of yore. What floors me about Forrester’s prediction is how willing the industry is to cede its leadership in understanding people.

These digital behemoths have reduced users to data points that brands can buy for pennies on the dollar. They don’t need to understand their users. Heck, they don’t even need to acknowledge that there is a human user. What matters is the identifying ID that bought from an e-commerce shop after tapping an ad so bad that even a junior art director wouldn’t put it in a sparse portfolio.

Our industry can and should do better.

Let’s give life to those aggregated data points. Let’s help clients see what they are already pointing out themselves: AI slop and clickbait ads are not going to win hearts and minds.

Research from System1 and others has shown that creators, as proper collaborators, can play a brand-building role. We can’t settle for becoming an orchestrator when at the very least we should be composing the music.

The smart, creative people with empathy and curiosity that I wrote about on this website a half-decade ago are what make the advertising industry great.

And these people aren’t gone. In terms of positioning, they are still our most valuable offer. They show us that when the advertising industry focuses on people, both those creating the ads and those enjoying them, the advertising industry wins.

By Rick Evans

Rick Evans is a freelance senior brand strategist and marketer with more than 17 years of experience at brands and agencies. Read more…

Sourced from Muse by Clios