Author

editor

Browsing

By Rubicon Project country manager ANZ Rohan Creasey

We’ve all been there…you’re in the middle of shopping online for a present for a loved one’s birthday, and suddenly, you realise ads for the products you’ve been considering are following you around the web. If you made the mistake of searching on a home computer shared by said loved one, the surprise will be well and truly spoiled.

Welcome to the world of retargeting. Although it might be deemed annoying by some, this technique plays into one of the oldest concepts of marketing – the Rule of Seven which states that your prospects need to come across your offer at least seven times before they really notice and start to take action. At its heyday, retargeting was driving up to ten times higher click through rate (CTR) in comparison to standard display ads, so it’s easy to see why so many marketers, advertisers and publishers are fond of retargeting.

But retargeting has a significant Achilles heel: cookies. Retargeting requires cookies, yet cookies weren’t designed for retargeting. Like much of adtech, we used a hack to repurpose a technology meant for something else, and cookies aren’t wholly reliable pieces of data. And now we are paying the price. Users can manually delete cookies whenever they want, and many spam filters delete them automatically. Additionally, when a user moves to another device, say from their desktop to their phone, the cookie is unable to follow their journey. Considering the majority of web traffic is now mobile, even this simple deficiency is a major stumbling block for cookie-based targeting.

Traditionally, the majority of cookies had a shelf life of about 30 days, meaning marketers were challenged to effectively map a customer journey beyond a month. Likewise, most mobile devices do not accept cookies and more recently browsers including Safari, Firefox and Chrome started to block certain cookies by default – making retargeting significantly more challenging.

The message is clear: advertisers and publishers alike need to start planning for a cookie-less world. The display world should draw inspiration from formats including digital out-of-home, audio, and app that generally operate successfully without cookies.

One of the obvious ways to adapt to the cookie-less future is contextual advertising. This relatively old school technique remains an efficient way to capture customers who are interested in your product or service, simply through targeting the pages that those customers are more likely to visit. If you sell car parts, you might choose to advertise on a web page detailing how to fix a car. It’s a simple technique, but it’s (still) incredibly effective.

It’s just that as an industry we were totally sucked into the bubble of focusing on super-fine targeting at the expense of the broader contextual considerations. Perhaps this is because our industry has so many tech parties vying for business or because agencies have been so captivated by algorithms and shifted their attention away from the simpler contextual approach.

Another benefit of contextual advertising, and methods like it, are that they comply with data privacy rules laid out in legislation, including the GDPR. As more countries begin to implement similar legislation, cookies will only face increasing scrutiny.

Google and Facebook have a lot to gain from a world without retargeting. The tech giants have a wealth of first-party data at their fingertips, making them perfectly positioned for a new wave of people-based targeting. Instead of tracking the user through individual site visits and sessions, each user is assigned an ID, which is then tracked wherever that user is signed in.

This is an increasingly popular alternative to retargeting, because the technique overcomes many of the issues, including not being able to follow a user across devices. However, as users become more aware and concerned with data privacy, advertisers need to proceed with caution. If customers are wary of retargeting, people-based marketing takes those concerns to a whole new level.

In order to survive in a world without retargeting, publishers must start to realise the power of their own platforms, their own content and their own audiences (and don’t forget that relying on a third-party log-in – like walled gardens- gives those third-parties a window into your audience).

Contextual advertising and forms of advertising that don’t rely on user data have always been valuable and viable, and maybe now especially so in our data-conscious world. And while retargeting will live on for quite a while, in the end we have to stop putting all our cookies in one jar.

By Rohan Creasey

Sourced from AdNews

Sourced from Reuters

(Reuters) – Martin Sorrell’s S4 Capital has bought Silicon Valley’s biggest independent agency, Firewood, for $150 million in its latest deal to form a purely digital global advertising firm.

The world’s best-known advertising boss is building up the new venture following his departure from ad giant WPP, sealing deals for digital content that runs on platforms like Facebook and Google, and the automated placing of ads online.

Sorrell said digital growth was “on fire” and his focus on it meant he was currently involved in five large pitches.

S4 will gain access to Firewood’s client base in the United States, including Facebook, Google, LinkedIn, Salesforce and VMware.

S4 raised 100 million pounds ($123 million) through a placing to part fund the Firewood deal and to build up a war chest for future acquisitions.

Rather than replicate WPP, the world’s biggest advertising company he created with a holding company model, Sorrell is buying smaller agencies and merging them into one arm producing content and one arm handling the programmatic placing of ads.

“I don’t want to end up with a fragmented model,” he said.

Sorrell told Reuters he is still looking to acquire companies that own first-party data on consumer habits, but said he had two small deals looming for data analytics companies, with one in London and one in Korea.

“They will slot in to the programmatic offer,” he said.

S4 has already won work from the likes of Procter & Gamble, Nestle, Coca-Cola and Sprint and had said it was being asked to bid for other major clients.

Industry data released on Monday showed the U.S. advertising market remained solid, helped by small- and medium-sized companies spending on digital platforms to reach customers.

Feature Image Credit: FILE PHOTO: Sir Martin Sorrell attends a conference at the Cannes Lions International Festival of Creativity, in Cannes, France, June 22, 2018. REUTERS/Eric Gaillard/File Photo

Sourced from Reuters

Reporting by Kate Holton in London and Pushkala Aripaka in Bengaluru, Editing by Sherry Jacob-Phillips and Alexander Smith

‘We’re very sorry this happened’

On Tuesday, Twitter announced that it “unintentionally” used phone numbers and email addresses for advertising purposes even though the information was provided by users for two-factor authentication.

According to Twitter, no personal data was shared with the company’s third-party partners, and the “issue that allowed this to occur” has been addressed. As of September 17th, phone numbers and email addresses are now only collected for security purposes, Twitter said.

“We cannot say with certainty how many people were impacted by this,” Twitter said in a blog post disclosing the security mishap. “We’re very sorry this happened and are taking steps to make sure we don’t make a mistake like this again.”

Over the past year, Facebook has taken the brunt of criticism over its privacy malpractices, but Twitter has been embroiled in its own controversies over how it handles the privacy of its users. Just last month, Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey’s account was compromised after hackers were able to tweet racial slurs via text message.

In May 2018, Twitter advised its users, all 330 million of them, to change their passwords after a bug was discovered that exposed them in plain text. Twitter said at the time that no information was breached or misused.

Feature Image Credit: Illustration by Alex Castro / The Verge

Sourced from The Verge

By Josh Constine

Books on tape were the lifeblood of self-help. But e-learning startups like Khan Academy and Coursera demanded our eyes, not just our ears. Then came podcasts that make knowledge accessible, yet rarely focus on you retaining and applying what they teach.

Today, a new startup called Knowable is launching to provide gaze-free audio education at $100 per eight-hour course on topics like how to launch a startup or how to sleep better. The idea is that by layering chapter summaries and eventually interactive activities atop premium, long-form, ad-free lessons, it can become the trusted name in learning anywhere. With always-in Bluetooth earbuds and smart speakers becoming ubiquitous, we can imbibe content in smaller chunks in new environments. Knowable wants to fill that time with self-improvement.

The big question is whether Knowable can differentiate its content from free alternatives and build a moat against copycats through savvy voice-responsive learning exercises so you don’t forget everything.

To evolve beyond the podcast, Knowable has raised a $3.75 million seed round led by Andreessen Horowitz’s partner Connie Chan, and joined by Upfront, First Round and Initialized. “The market is ready for a company like Knowable. Their timing is right and their team possesses the rare combination of product expertise and creative media experience necessary to win. That’s why I’m not just hosting Knowable’s first course, Launch a Startup, we’re also one of the earliest investors in the company,” says Initialized’s Alexis Ohanian.

There’s certainly a market opportunity, as 32% of Americans listen to podcasts monthly, up from 26% in 2018, with 74% of those citing the desire to learn. Half of Americans have listened to an audio book. The e-learning market is $190 billion today, but projected to grow to $300 billion as bloated and expensive higher education succumbs to cheaper and more focused options.

But to score consistent revenue, Knowable must build up its library and execute on plans to offer a subscription service with access to updates on prior lessons. A major challenge will be bundling classes on the right topics that don’t exhaust users so they keep listening and paying.

Building a school from sound

“My first-generation immigrant parents came here without college degrees. Great teachers let me move up the socioeconomic ladder pretty quickly,” says Knowable co-founder Warren Shaeffer. “The genesis of the idea came from our shared interest in education and the value of great teachers.”

Shaeffer and his co-founder Alex Benzer have already been through the struggles of startup life together. After meeting at MuckerLab in LA and splitting from their respective co-founders, in 2007 they created SocialEngine, a community website builder that sold to Room 214. Next they built up a video platform for independent creators called Vidme that raised $9 million but never became sustainable before selling to Giphy in 2018.

The pair had glimpsed how great content could rope in an audience, but felt like the true potential of the podcast hadn’t been explored. Why did they have to be produced on the cheap, distributed on generic platforms and supported by ads? Knowable emerged as a way to create luxury audio, delivered through a purpose-built app and paid for with direct sales or subscriptions. Instead of recording unscripted discussions as episodes, they mapped out course curriculum and filled them with structured advice from experts.

I’m a few hours into the Ohanian-hosted Launch a Startup. It’s certainly a lot more efficient than trying to learn the basics just through storytelling from podcasts like Reid Hoffman’s Masters of Scale or NPR’s How I Built This. One chapter breaks down the top ways startups die and the traits you’ll need to persevere. From optimism and resilience operating in unstructured environments to a refusal to make excuses why you can’t succeed, Ohanian cooly recaps the learnings at the end of the chapter. Open the app and you’ll get a written summary plus suggested blog posts and books for diving deeper. An accompanying 95-page PDF workbook collects all the key learnings for rapid review later.

The topic is huge, though, and Knowable is at its best when it’s distilling knowledge into neatly packaged lists and frameworks. The course’s weakest moments are when it feels most like a podcast, with somewhat meandering conversations with random founders discussing how they dealt with problems. Meanwhile, it currently lacks some basic tools like in-app notetaking and sharing, or as wide a range of playback speeds and rewind options as you’ll get on Audible. “We don’t think of ourselves as a podcast company,” Shaeffer says, but that’s still who he’s competing against.

What’s also missing is any true interactivity. The downside of audio learning is that if you’re not paying full attention, it’s easy to zone out. Knowable needs to develop voice and touch-controlled exercises to help users apply and retain the lessons. There are plans to launch learning communities where students can confer about the classes, akin to Y Combinator’s “Bookface” forum.

However, Shaeffer says that “we’re on a mission to make education more accessible and quizzes might be an impediment to that,” which leaves questions about what the learning activities will look like, even though they’re crucial to users coughing up $100 per class. It’s easy to imagine Spotify/Anchor, Gimlet Media or other major podcast players developing their own interactive features and classes if Knowable doesn’t get there first.

Snackable audio education

The startup’s bid for virality is the ability to give a friend a code to take the class with you. Knowable is also hoping big-name experts and quality driven by a team cobbled together from NPR, The Washington Post, William Morris Endeavor, Masterclass and Vice will set it apart. They’ve got a lot of work ahead to grow beyond the six courses currently available on topics like climate change activism and real estate, especially because there’s a 100% money-back guarantee if classes fall short.

 

For the moment, Knowable feels a bit late with its homework. It has the potential and demand to reinvent audio learning but currently sounds too similar to what’s already everywhere. I was hoping for a Bandersnatch for education that made a broadcast experience feel more like a game.

But the opportunity will only continue to grow as we spend more of our lives in earshot of AirPods and Echoes. With a broad enough library and clever editing, one day you might tell Knowable “teach me something about venture capital in eight minutes” as you walk to the coffee shop. That’s going to have a much better impact on your life than just scrolling through another feed.

AirPods and the rise of snackable audio

 

By Josh Constine

Sourced from TechCrunch

Sourced from DIGIDAY

While you can’t plan for uncertainty, you can prepare for it. The Advertising Association is encouraging the industry to plan for Brexit as the risks of the UK leaving the EU without a deal on 31 October 2019 are high.

In its remit of representing the interests of the UK advertising industry, the Advertising Association has brought together key pieces of information to ensure businesses have contingencies in place to continue receiving personal data lawfully in the event of a no-deal Brexit. This is intended to provide guidance, and does not replace legal advice.

The UK’s data protection regime is currently governed by the EU’s General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR) and the UK’s Data Protection Act 2018 (DPA 2018). If your organisation receives personal data from the EEA you will still need to abide by both GDPR and the DPA 2018 even after Brexit.

Assessing data adequacy
As the UK is currently a member of the EU, there are no restrictions on the flow of personal data and other EEA Member States. Article 45 of the GDPR states that the European Commission needs to assess the relevant country’s laws to determine whether they are essentially equivalent or “adequate” to that of EU ones.

The UK has announced that it will allow the flow of personal data to the EEA regardless of a deal being in place and will recognise existing European Commission data adequacy decisions. However, the EU has not yet made a similar commitment towards the UK. This is because on leaving the EU, the UK will become a ‘third country’. And while the UK remains an EU member, the European Commission will not conduct this assessment. Unfortunately, this means if we leave the EU without a deal we will not have a data adequacy decision in place to facilitate the free flow of personal data from the EEA.

Standard Contractual Clauses
In the absence of an adequacy decision, GDPR states that personal data can be transferred to a third country or an international organisation if there are appropriate safeguards. There are a number of recognized safeguards, but most appropriate to businesses are the implementation of Standard Contractual Clauses (SCCs).

SCCs are a standard set of contractual terms and conditions for the transfer of personal data which both the data exporter and the data importer enter into. They include contractual obligations that help to protect personal data when it leaves the EEA and ensure compliance with GDPR. SCCs only relate to the transfer of personal data, so they can be incorporated into a wider contract that covers other business terms. One of the key benefits of using these SCCs is that they are approved by the European Commission.

Binding corporate rules
If you are a multinational operating in the UK and in one or more EEA country, then Binding Corporate Rules are required to transfer personal data between the different parts of the Group located in the UK and the EEA.

US Privacy Shield
If you send data to a US Privacy Shield organisation, the Privacy Shield participant will need to update their public commitment to specifically reference the UK, in addition to the EU. There is further information on the US government’s Privacy Shield website. In addition, the ICO has published guidance for organisations about international data transfers.

Data Protection Lead Authority
If the ICO is your lead Data Protection Authority, you may need to review your operations to assess whether you can still have a lead authority and benefit from the one-stop-shop following Brexit.

Appointing a data representative.
If you are a data controller or processor that is subject to GDPR but not established in the EEA – as will be the case when the UK leaves the EU – you have an obligation to designate a data representative based in the EEA. This representative will be the go-to person to deal with individuals and DPAs in the EEA. The UK plans to oblige non-UK controllers who are subject to the UK data protection framework to appoint representatives in the UK if they are processing UK data on a large scale.

It’s important to regularly check the GOV.UK website for updates. The ICO has a page dedicated to Brexit that covers the implications for data protection and data transfers in more detail and its SCC tool provides template contracts. If you need more information about your obligations and what you need to do to comply, we recommend seeking legal advice.

For more information on matters relating to Brexit, visit the Advertising Association website: https://www.adassoc.org.uk/policy-areas-category/Brexit/

Sourced from DIGIDAY

By Ankush Das

Self-destructing messages are quite useful when it comes to sharing sensitive information. You might have seen this feature on Telegram and some other messaging apps.

However, for WhatsApp, it is going to be a significant feature addition when it arrives. You may or may not observe the feature yet in the latest beta but WABetaInfo spotted this addition.

It is currently in the development phase and will be rolling out to the stable version soon enough.

In WhatsApp, the self-destructing messages might be termed as “Disappearing” messages. It should allow you to send a message and specify a timer to self-destruct.

WABetaInfo also notes that it lets you choose a time of 5 seconds or 1 hour for the messages to disappear.

You will probably be able to utilize the feature on Groups too – including individual conversations.

With the information available right now, we cannot confirm whether or not it is going to have more timer options to the disappearing messages. However, we do know that it is going to work just like the Telegram app does for self-destructing messages.

Do note that there has been no official announcements regarding the feature. Given the history of WhatsApp beta features, it is best to assume that it is in the early development phase and the feature may or may not make it to the final stable build.

While this feature should come in handy for every user, we just have to wait for it to ship with the next major release.

By Ankush Das

Sourced from ubergizmo

By Brett Molina 

Facebook CEO and co-founder Mark Zuckerberg said he will “go to the mat” and fight efforts to break up the social networking giant, according to leaked audio from meetings with employees.

The leaked audio, obtained by tech site The Verge, originated from two meetings Zuckerberg held with Facebook employees in July.

The sessions covered a range of topics, including increased calls by lawmakers to break up Facebook. Zuckerberg said Facebook would legally challenge any efforts to split up the tech giant.

“We care about our country and want to work with our government and do good things, Zuckerberg said. “But look, at the end of the day, if someone’s going to try to threaten something that existential, you go to the mat and you fight.”

Zuckerberg also said breaking up Facebook, or other tech titans like Google and Amazon, won’t solve issues raised by lawmakers, including how they handle the spread of misinformation on their platforms.

“It doesn’t make election interference less likely,” Zuckerberg said. “It makes it more likely because now the companies can’t coordinate and work together.”

Warren hits back: Facebook’s Zuckerberg criticized her plan to break up big tech

Zuckerberg speaks out: Facebook CEO says breaking up social network wouldn’t help

Zuckerberg has long said Facebook shouldn’t be broken up despite calls seeking such a move, including from co-founder Chris Hughes, who wrote in a May op-ed for The New York Times that the power amassed by Zuckerberg is “unprecedented and un-American.”

Two weeks after that op-ed, Zuckerberg said on a call with reporters that a breakup would make tackling issues more challenging.

Feature Image Credit: Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg.

By Brett Molina

Follow Brett Molina on Twitter: @brettmolina23.

Sourced from USA Today

By Jason Aten

With iOS 13 comes a major update that might just convince you to stop using Google for this important task.

It’s one of the most fundamental things people do on their smartphone every day, and for years, even if you were using an iPhone, there’s a pretty good chance you were using Google to do it. Specifically, Google Maps.

Headed to an appointment, pull up directions in Google Maps. Going on vacation? Google Maps. Looking for a store or restaurant in town? Google Maps. Ordering lunch to be delivered? Google Maps does that, too.

Sure, you can do most of those things using Apple’s native Maps app, but for much of the first five years of its existence, you were just as likely to end up being told to turn down a road that doesn’t exist. That’s a big problem for an app whose job is to provide accurate directions from point A to point B.

That’s because Apple Maps was really bad. Apple even admitted it. Not only that, but in addition to apologizing for how bad the app was, it actually recommended using Google Maps instead. So most people did.

So, Apple started rebuilding its app the hard way. Instead of purchasing maps from third-party vendors, which caused problems with updates and data, the company started its own mapping initiative. Like Google, it sent out vehicles to take photographs for street level views of buildings and locations.

And, over time, Apple Maps got better. It still had a long way to go before people were willing to trust it for directions to an important meeting, but it was clear Apple was serious about making Apple Maps the navigation choice for iOS users.

Now that iOS 13 has been released, Apple has started rolling out major improvements it previewed at the company’s Worldwide Developer Conference this summer. That includes a range of features, but the one that users will notice right away is simple–it just looks better. Like, a lot better. Apple has updated the overall interface and added substantially more detail to a wide area of the country, including most of the Northeast and California.

That detail includes far more topographical detail along with new, higher-res images in the “Look Around” feature (think: Google Street View). It also includes greater detail of green space, as well as water features. New integrations with third-party apps like Uber make it easier to book a rideshare, though it still lacks the food ordering capability of Google Maps.

It also lags behind Google in one other important way–it only offers transit directions in 10 major cities, compared to the virtually universal offerings from Google. I’ve used it in New York City, and it works great. In fact, I found it more helpful than Google’s version. I especially liked the real-time arrival information. But in most cities, you’re on your own for now.

Of course, Apple says it’s just starting, with the rest of the U.S. to be updated by the end of the year. That fast pace shows just how seriously Apple wants you to stop using Google Maps.

Apple’s motivation is simple–besides the fact that Maps was a major embarrassment, the company is committed to reducing the ways Google monetizes iOS users. With over one billion devices running iOS, that’s no small amount of money for either company.
And with these updates, Apple Maps is now at least a worthy contender, one the company hopes will finally convince you to tell Google Maps to “get lost.”

Feature Image Credit: Getty Images

By Jason Aten

Sourced from Inc.

For many users, logging onto Twitter is a daily gamble. You might return to a calm newsfeed or your mentions and direct messages may be overtaken by abuse. Recently, Twitter launched its anti-abuse filter for DMs, but the platform’s newest feature seems like yet another bandaid rather than a solution.

Back in August, Twitter began testing its filter for Message Requests, or DMs from people that you don’t follow. It works by hiding messages that might contain offensive content behind a warning. You’re given the option to delete a message without having to open it at all.

After a month and a half of testing, Twitter decided to officially roll out the feature. The company tweeted, “We tested, and turns out filters help you cut through the noise to find gems. Who knew. So we’re rolling out this filter to everyone on iOS, Android, and web!”

It seems Twitter is on a roll when it comes to giving users options to hide unwanted messages on it site. Earlier this month, the platform also introduced its Hide Replies feature in both the United States and Canada.

However, neither of these features are actually doing anything to stop the abuse itself. That means for many of Twitter’s users, marginalized people specifically, these features may be functionally useless.

If you’re marginalized and on Twitter, you’ve probably faced harassment and abuse before. From receiving outright threats to having slurs brought into your mentions, the abuse varies, but it’s always ugly. To organizations like Amnesty International, the level of abuse that some groups receive constitutes a human rights violation.

In December 2018, Amnesty International released a report looking into violence and abuse of women on Twitter. The report found that 71 percent of tweets sent to women were problematic or abusive. That statistic is alarming by itself, but it gets worse for women of color — especially Black women.

Amnesty International reported that “Black women were disproportionately targeted.” They are 84 percent more likely than white women to be mentioned in abusive or problematic tweets.

“Online abuse against women on this scale should not and does not have to exist on social media platforms,” Amnesty International wrote. “Companies like Twitter have a responsibility to respect human rights, which means ensuring that women using the platform are able to express themselves freely and without fear.”

Along with rampant abuse of women, Twitter has seen a rise of members of the alt-right and white nationalism on its platform. In 2017, Vanity Fair reported on Twitter’s verification of white nationalists like Jason Kessler, who helped organize the Charlottesville white-supremacist rally where protester Heather Heyer died. Twitter has taken steps to deplatform some of these people.

Part of why Twitter seemingly refuses to appropriately tackle abuse can be attributed to the same logic the company uses to claim that it has “no bias”.

Last year, in a prepared statement for his appearance before the US House Committee on Energy and Commerce, CEO Jack Dorsey wrote:

“Twitter does not use political ideology to make any decisions, whether related to ranking content on our service or how we enforce our rules…from a simple business perspective and to serve the public conversation, Twitter is incentivized to keep all voices on the platform.”

By refusing to acknowledge the role political ideologies like white nationalism can play in harassment, Twitter leaves the door open for members of the alt-right to continue utilizing its platform for abuse. Not only that, but people engaging with harassers can drive up ad views, and make the platform money.

Twitter’s problem has become so rampant that TechCrunch even referred to the platform as a “Nazi haven”. While Twitter’s new Hide Replies feature and DM filter might make it a little easier to dodge some abuse, neither of them are actual answers for it.

It’s time for Twitter to stop putting the onus on individual users to prevent their own abuse. As a platform, Twitter has a responsibility to re-evaluate the culture that allowed this problem to grow virtually unchecked.

Sourced from Mic

By

Reddit has this week announced some new video ad options, as it seeks to maximize its revenue opportunities heading into the holiday season.

First up, Reddit is adding a new mobile landing page flow for video ads, which will better guide users through the ad engagement process.

process.

Reddit video ad flow

As explained by Reddit:

To improve the video ads experience for both users and advertisers, we are enabling a new landing page on mobile that combines a seamless viewing experience with additional branding and product information that directs to the advertiser’s website. With this update, Reddit users who click an in-feed video ad will be taken to a website that will continue playing the video, uninterrupted, alongside other branding and marketing from the advertiser.”

It essentially builds out the Reddit video ad experience – rather than re-directing you to another site, Reddit will now facilitate more branding and engagement opportunities within its own video experience.

Reddit will also now support additional aspect ratios in its video ads, with 1:1 square and 4:5 vertical video now available, in addition to 16:9 and 4:3 video formats.

Reddit video ad specs

“This means advertisers can now utilize cross-platform video assets – without having to recreate content specifically for Reddit ads – and will have more options to choose from.”

And finally, Reddit is also now offering optional referral URLs for CPV campaigns, “which will enable a cleaner video ad experience for campaigns with video views as the primary campaign objective”.

While it may not be your primary social marketing option, Reddit does still hold significant potential, and can be a valuable advertising and outreach option – for those brands that are able to get it right.

The growing platform currently serves 330 Million monthly active users, across some 130,000 active communities. In fact, there are Reddit communities (subreddits) for pretty much everything you can think of, each with passionate, dedicated members, discussing news and issues that are likely of relevance to your industry.

Reddit relevance

Reddit is also seeing 30% growth in views, year on year, and facilitates reach to audiences who are simply not active on other networks.

It might not be the prime candidate for your outreach, but the numbers suggest that it may well be worth some additional consideration.

These new video options will expand the potential for experimentation on the site – something to keep in mind for your 2020 planning.

By

Follow Andrew Hutchinson on Twitter

Sourced from Social Media Today