Tag

Email Leads

Browsing

By

Email is the top tool for driving leads into the pipeline — it is now being used by 67% of B2B marketers, according to Tapping Multi-Channel Marketing & Data As Key Engines For Growth, a study by DemandGen. Websites are used by 60%,and search by 50%. But search grew by almost 10% from last year.

Email is also the most effective channel — 59% say it works well for driving early-stage engagement. Search is second, and is cited by 56%. But email has no real competition in producing conversions later in the funnel — 81% say it’s effective, compared to 50%, who cite web sites and

No wonder the report calls email “the go-to channel.”

Overall, the study paints an optimistic picture — 70% of B2B marketers plan to increase their demand-gen budgets this year. Moreover, 22% expect hikes of over 20% and 12% anticipate 30% rises. Another 36% are allocating 1-10%.

In addition, 63% project revenue growth of more than 20%, and 25% foresee 30% increases. Also, 28% now have specific revenue-based quotas, a 5% over 2017. An 30% say pipeline influence is their main metric, for a 3% rise year-over-year. The study suggests that these are positive developments. Only 11% say accounts engaged is their primary measurement tool.

What are B2B marketers trying to do? Their main goals are focusing on lead quality over lead quantity (73%) and improving conversion rates and campaign results (72%).

Other objectives include increased lead volume (62%) and improving their ability to measure and analyze marketing impact (61%). Another 60% hope to improve their sales-marketing alignment, and 48% to improve their database accuracy.

Drilling down, case studies are best at converting and accelerating leads at the middle and late stages of the funnel (73%). Lead-nurturing campaigns are second (63%). But events are most useful in generating qualified leads at the top of the funnel.

B2B marketers are also seeking new MarTech tools, with 49% picking account-based technology (a slight decline from last year). Also, they plan to test multichannel lead nurturing (41%), content planning (37%), syndication, retargeting (37%) marketing automation (33%) and predictive lead scoring (29%).

That said, many may be hampered by the challenge of attributing and measuring campaign influence. Their databases are hardly complete, judging by this list of priorities:

  • We are actively reviewing our database to ensure we have full and complete contacts — 38%
  • Our database has good coverage, but many contacts are incomplete or inaccurate — 31%
  • Our contact database is inaccurate/is not adequate in covering our target markets — 18%
  • Our database is current and provides complete coverage of key segments — 10%
  • Not sure — 3%

As the study infers, all of this should lead to more accurate email marketing.

DemandGen surveyed 160 marketing executives. The study is sponsored by Content Demand, Integrate and Selling Simplified.

By  ,

Sourced from MediaPost

By ,

Email remains the top personalization channel, with 72% of marketers using it  and 71% rating it as very or extremely important, according to a survey released today by Evergage. Email campaigns are deployed more than any other type of customer experience.

But marketers are more satisfied with the results they get from Web applications. And overall, only 45% agree that they are “getting personalization right.”

Evergage and Researchscape International surveyed 206 organizations of various sizes and categories.

On the positive side, 96% agree that personalization helps advance customer relationships. And 88% think their customers expect a personalized experience.

In addition, 46% plan to increase their personalization spend this year, while 50% will hold steady and 4% will decrease their budgets.

But brands face obstacles in their personalization efforts. The top one, cited by 48%, is budget. And 44% said that other priorities get in the way.

Smaller percentages specified lack of knowledge/skills/people (41%), lack of effective solution technology (33%) and lack of executive sponsorship (26%). Not a single marketer chose the “personalization is a fad” answer.

The survey also found that a mere 30% are satisfied with their personalization efforts, although that is an increase from 18% last year. But it depends on their sector: 53% of the B2C respondents were very or extremely satisfied, compared with 21% of the B2B companies.

Asked to provide an academic grade for personalization, 44% awarded themselves a B, and 31% a C. Only 10% felt they deserved an A, an 3% said they were entitled to an F.

How do they conduct personalization? Of those polled, 67% use rule-based targeting to segments, while only 13% utilize an algorithmic 1-to-1 approach and 20% use both.

The survey also revealed that “many marketers are still unfamiliar with machine learning,” with 43% not sure of whether they will use it this year, Evergage says.

Following email in terms of personalization usage are Web sites (57%), mobile Web sites (28%) and mobile apps (18). When rating activities in terms of importance, though, email was followed closely by SEO (68%) and content marketing (67%).

The bad news about email is that only 39% are very or extremely satisfied with the level of personalization it provides. In this, email fell behind mobile apps (45%), Web sites (41%), and Web applications (52%).

Yet 65% deploy email campaigns as a personalized customer experience, compared with home pages (58%), recommendations (58%), interior pages (50%), navigation (29%), search (27%) and pricing (22%).

Success is measured by improvements in conversion rates (68%), click-through rates (50%), time spent on-site (39%) and revenue 39%). Further down the list are retention/renewal rates (33%), customer satisfaction rates (31%), page views (30%) and bounce rates (26%).

However, the benefits derived from personalization are slightly different. They include:

  • Increased conversion rates — 63%
  • Improved customer experience — 61%
  • Increased visitor engagement — 57%
  • Improved brand perception — 46
  • Increased customer lifetime value/loyalty — 45%

The survey also revealed these tidbits of information:

  • 88% have improved their results with personalization. Evergage reported that 53%) of “typically see a lift of over 10% while 36% typically see lift of 1-10% or less,” Evergage writes. “A remarkable 10% of respondents saw a lift of greater than 30%.”
  • 63% reported increased conversion rates, while 61% achieved an improved customer experience and 57% better visitor engagement.
  • 70% feel their marketing tools help them understand their customer data.
  • 33% are very or extremely confident that they have the tools they need for Web site and/or in-app personalization.
  • 59% have personnel focused on engagement. Of those that do, 57% say they are part-time and 38% full-time. Nine percent don’t know.

By ,

Sourced from MediaPost