Tag

Google

Browsing

By Francesca Pezzoli

VP Marketing at Looper Insights. Writing about how AI is transforming marketing strategy, visibility, and long-term growth planning.

For decades, search engine optimization (SEO), pay-per-click (PPC) advertising and paid media strategies have been grounded in one central truth: If you could optimize your content to appeal to Google’s algorithm, you could climb the ranks, earn visibility and influence discovery. Whether it was organic reach or ad placement, it revolved around Google’s ecosystem. That ecosystem has shaped how most companies structure their marketing strategies, hire teams and allocate budget.

But with generative AI tools changing how people search, that centre of gravity is changing. This shift is happening faster than most in our industry are ready to admit.

The Shift From SEO

At the time of writing, Google still holds its dominant position in search. Gemini, despite being integrated into some search experiences, has not yet meaningfully disrupted that dominance. But what users encounter when interacting with Gemini through standard Google Search feels significantly different—less intuitive and less capable—than the experience within the standalone Gemini app or other generative tools. The first issue is usability. The second—and more complex—is trust.

Most generative tools currently offer unsponsored results. For now, when I ask a model like ChatGPT, “Which are the best analytics platforms in media and entertainment?” I get a list shaped by public data and contextual relevance, not paid placements. That is a major contrast to traditional search, where we have spent years fine-tuning search engine marketing (SEM) strategies that would help position our companies near the top of the results page.

This shift means companies, including ours, are pausing to rethink. At Looper Insights, we have started reducing investment in SEO and PPC—not because they are suddenly worthless, but because we need time to understand how this new search behaviour works and where it is heading. When the rules change, it is smart to slow down and observe before going all in.

For others looking to follow suit, I recommend reinvesting some of that budget into activities that feel less volatile and more value-driven, such as live events and well-placed PR. These are hardly new tactics, but they are gaining new relevance. In a fragmented search environment, you need credibility to travel with the user wherever they go. A thoughtful piece of press coverage or a face-to-face conversation builds trust in ways no keyword strategy ever could.

A New Phase In Marketing

What’s tricky is that many agencies and consultants are already rushing to sell AI-driven SEO strategies, and it’s easy to see why. When your role depends on staying ahead of change, there’s pressure to appear as though you’ve already cracked the code. But the reality is, no one has. Not yet. The platforms are still evolving. Monetization models remain unsettled. And most importantly, user behaviour is still shifting, sometimes week by week.

Will generative tools eventually introduce sponsored recommendations? Most likely. If you look at how Google evolved, it is a familiar pattern. Trust first, monetize later. Once a tool becomes embedded in how we work, shop, travel and even diagnose our health, the influence it holds becomes exponential. When that time comes, the marketing playbook will change again, but we are not there yet.

We are, however, seeing clear early signals. According to Similarweb, about 60% of Google searches now end without any external clicks. Users are increasingly finding what they need directly in search summaries without ever visiting a site. Data shared by Barron’s (registration required) shows Google-generated traffic has already dropped by 20% for travel sites, 17% for news outlets and 9% for e-commerce platforms. This is a measurable decline that reflects real behavioural change.

For marketers, this is both exciting and uncomfortable. We are entering a new phase. For the first time in a long while, we are not optimizing incrementally. We are facing a foundational shift in how visibility is earned.

The old frameworks are not being improved—they are being replaced. That does not mean we need to panic, but it does mean we need to pay close attention and be willing to experiment without expecting familiar returns.

Closing Thoughts

I believe there has never been a better time to be in marketing. The past decade gave us refinement. The next 10 years will bring reinvention. The unknown brings some hesitation, but mostly, it brings energy. I feel fortunate to be doing this work right now.

This article is the first in a series about the pillars of marketing that are being reshaped. Next, I will explore how the shift toward hyper-personalized content capsules could upend everything we thought we knew about content creation, messaging and what relevance really looks like in this new environment.

Feature image credit: getty

By Francesca Pezzoli

COUNCIL POST | Membership (fee-based)

VP Marketing at Looper Insights. Writing about how AI is transforming marketing strategy, visibility, and long-term growth planning. Read Francesca Pezzoli’s full executive profile here.

Find Francesca Pezzoli on LinkedIn. Visit Francesca’s website.

Sourced from Forbes

By Meera Navlakha

More AI-powered ads are coming to your search results.

Google is pushing advertisers to buy ads in AI mode, according to a report from AdAge. The publication caught onto slides from Google pitching AI Mode ads to potential buyers.

“Be part of our most powerful AI search experience, as customers explore their biggest questions with AI Mode,” read one slide in the presentation. “As we apply the power of Generative AI to Search, Ads will continue to play a critical role in helping consumers find helpful information and enabling businesses to be discovered online.”

Google reportedly told advertisers that the new ads would come in the form of text and shopping ads with product details within AI Mode chats. The ads would be presented in response to user queries.

From a mock-up in the presentation, the ads appear in banners under AI search queries, indicated by a “Sponsored” label. The slides describe the AI Mode advertisements as an “experiment.”

According to AdAge, Google will roll out ads in AI mode before the fourth quarter. The tech giant told AdAge that they have already started showing more ads in AI mode and have seen “incredible results.” In May 2025, Google announced that it was testing these ads, writing in a blog post, “Where relevant, ads may appear below and integrated into AI Mode responses.”

Google’s revenue from ads was estimated to be $96.5 billion in the fourth quarter of last year alone. So far, advertisements have been rare in AI chatbots like Google Gemini and ChatGPT. But as Google shifts away from traditional search and toward AI search, the company’s massive ad inventory could shift as well.

Google has a big head start when it comes to AI search, and so far it has 30 times more traffic than its rivals. Its AI search results surpassed those of rivals like ChatGPT, with 16.5 billion visits in December 2024.

Google inserting ads into its AI search tools is just the beginning. Spending on AI-powered search advertising is projected to reach nearly $29 billion by 2029, according to Reuters.

 

Feature image credit: Google.

 By Meera Navlakha

Meera is a journalist based between London and New York. Her work has been published in The New York Times, Vice, The Independent, Vogue India, W Magazine, and others. She was previously a Culture Reporter at Mashable.

Sourced from Mashable

Sourced from Yahoo! finance

Digital Giants Such as Google, Meta, Amazon, and TikTok Reshape Ad Spending as Retail Media, CTV, and DOOH Lead Emerging Trends

Key market opportunities in online advertising include expanding targeted reach and real-time performance tracking across digital platforms. The shift towards mobile, social media, and streaming content drives increased ad spending. Innovations in AI, programmatic ads, and data analytics enhance personalization and engagement, while privacy regulations propel new targeting strategies.

Online Advertising Market

Online Advertising Market
Online Advertising Market

Dublin, July 24, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — The “Online Advertising – Global Strategic Business Report” report has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com’s offering.

The global market for Online Advertising was estimated at US$219.1 Billion in 2024 and is projected to reach US$352.3 Billion by 2030, growing at a CAGR of 8.2% from 2024 to 2030. This comprehensive report provides an in-depth analysis of market trends, drivers, and forecasts, helping you make informed business decisions. The report includes the most recent global tariff developments and how they impact the Online Advertising market.

Growth in the online advertising market is driven by several factors. Rapid digitization of consumer behaviour and media consumption is expanding available ad inventory across mobile, video, and social platforms. Advancements in automation, analytics, and personalization technologies are enhancing campaign effectiveness and operational efficiency. Increased use of e-commerce and digital services is pushing brands to compete for online visibility and conversion.

Regulatory shifts and privacy concerns are spurring innovation in ethical data practices and ad delivery models. Additionally, growing investment from small and medium enterprises, facilitated by self-serve ad platforms and affordable pricing models, is expanding market participation. These factors collectively support the sustained evolution and expansion of online advertising as a dominant force in the global marketing landscape.

Why Online Advertising Continues to Dominate Global Marketing Strategies?

Online advertising has become a cornerstone of modern marketing, offering targeted reach, real-time performance tracking, and high scalability across digital platforms. As consumers increasingly shift toward mobile devices, social media, and streaming content, businesses are allocating larger shares of their budgets to online channels. Unlike traditional media, online advertising enables precision targeting based on user behaviour, demographics, interests, and location, making campaigns more efficient and measurable.

The broad spectrum of digital ad formats-such as display ads, video ads, native content, paid search, and influencer marketing-allows brands to engage users at multiple touchpoints. E-commerce growth, digital media consumption, and the rise of app-based services have further expanded advertising inventory across platforms. With its cost-effectiveness, performance-based pricing models, and data-driven optimization, online advertising continues to outpace conventional channels in both reach and return on investment.

How Are Technologies and Data Analytics Transforming Online Ad Ecosystems?

Technological innovation is driving significant transformation in how online ads are created, delivered, and optimized. Programmatic advertising, which uses automated platforms and real-time bidding (RTB), has streamlined media buying and improved ad targeting efficiency. Artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms are being used to personalize ad content, forecast campaign performance, and identify high-converting audiences.

Data analytics tools provide advertisers with granular insights into user engagement, click-through rates, and conversion paths, enabling continuous campaign refinement. Dynamic ad serving technologies customize messages in real-time based on context, such as user location, time of day, or device. Additionally, augmented reality (AR), interactive video, and shoppable content are enriching the user experience and driving higher interaction rates. These developments are making digital campaigns more responsive, immersive, and performance-oriented.

What Market Shifts Are Reshaping Online Advertising Strategies?

The shift away from third-party cookies and growing privacy regulations are prompting advertisers to rethink data collection and targeting methods. Platforms are transitioning to privacy-compliant frameworks, emphasizing first-party data, contextual advertising, and consent-based personalization. Apple`s App Tracking Transparency and Google’s planned cookie phaseout are accelerating adoption of alternative identity solutions and clean-room technologies.

Meanwhile, the dominance of digital platforms such as Google, Meta, Amazon, and TikTok continues to influence ad spending patterns. Retail media networks, connected TV (CTV), and digital out-of-home (DOOH) advertising are emerging as fast-growing segments, offering brands new avenues to reach audiences across devices and locations. In response to ad fatigue and banner blindness, marketers are investing more in branded content, influencer partnerships, and user-generated content to maintain engagement and authenticity.

Report Features:

  • Comprehensive Market Data: Independent analysis of annual sales and market forecasts in US$ Million from 2024 to 2030.
  • In-Depth Regional Analysis: Detailed insights into key markets, including the U.S., China, Japan, Canada, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Latin America, Middle East, and Africa.
  • Company Profiles: Coverage of players such as Adobe Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., Alphabet Inc. (Google Ads/YouTube), Baidu, Inc., Criteo S.A. and more.
  • Complimentary Updates: Receive free report updates for one year to keep you informed of the latest market developments.

Key Insights:

  • Market Growth: Understand the significant growth trajectory of the Social Media Advertising segment, which is expected to reach US$94.3 Billion by 2030 with a CAGR of a 10.6%. The Search Engine Advertising & PPC segment is also set to grow at 5.8% CAGR over the analysis period.
  • Regional Analysis: Gain insights into the U.S. market, estimated at $59.7 Billion in 2024, and China, forecasted to grow at an impressive 13.2% CAGR to reach $77.4 Billion by 2030. Discover growth trends in other key regions, including Japan, Canada, Germany, and the Asia-Pacific.

Scope Of Study:

  • Ad Format (Social Media Advertising, Search Engine Advertising & PPC, Email Marketing, Display Advertising, Native Advertising, Other Ad Formats)
  • Platform (Mobile Advertising, Web / Desktop Advertising)
  • Vertical (Automotive Vertical, Healthcare & Medical Vertical, Retail & CPG Vertical, Education Vertical, BFSI Vertical, Telecom Vertical, Other Verticals)

Key Attributes:

Report Attribute

Details

No. of Pages

393

Forecast Period

2024 – 2030

Estimated Market Value in 2024

219.1 Billion

Forecasted Market Value by 2030

352.3 Billion

Compound Annual Growth Rate

8.2%

Regions Covered

Global

MARKET OVERVIEW

  • Influencer Market Insights
  • World Market Trajectories
  • Tariff Impact on Global Supply Chain Patterns
  • Online Advertising – Global Key Competitors Percentage Market Share in 2025 (E)
  • Competitive Market Presence – Strong/Active/Niche/Trivial for Players Worldwide in 2025 (E)

MARKET TRENDS & DRIVERS

  • Shift Toward Digital-First Marketing Strategies Propels Growth in Online Advertising Budgets Across Industries
  • Rising Penetration of Mobile Devices and Apps Expands Addressable Market for Mobile-Optimized Ad Formats
  • Increased Use of Programmatic Advertising Platforms Drives Automation and Real-Time Bidding Efficiency
  • Growth in Social Media Engagement Strengthens Business Case for Influencer Marketing and Native Ads
  • Integration of AI and Machine Learning Enhances Targeting Accuracy and Personalization in Ad Campaigns
  • Stricter Data Privacy Regulations Throw Spotlight on First-Party Data Strategies and Consent-Based Targeting
  • Emergence of Retail Media Networks and E-Commerce Advertising Generates New Revenue Streams for Brands
  • Adoption of Video-Based Content on Streaming Platforms Spurs Demand for Dynamic and Interactive Video Ads
  • Decline in Traditional TV Viewership Accelerates Brand Shifts to Connected TV (CTV) and OTT Advertising
  • Expansion of Voice Search and Smart Devices Creates Opportunities for Contextual and Audio Advertising Formats
  • Widespread Use of Analytics and Attribution Tools Strengthens ROI Tracking and Campaign Optimization
  • Rising Digital Ad Fraud Risks Encourage Investment in Verification Tools and Ad Quality Control
  • Integration of Augmented Reality and Immersive Experiences Enhances Engagement in Online Ad Campaigns

FOCUS ON SELECT PLAYERS |Some of the 42 companies featured in this Online Advertising market report

  • Adobe Inc.
  • Amazon.com, Inc.
  • Alphabet Inc. (Google Ads/YouTube)
  • Baidu, Inc.
  • Criteo S.A.
  • Dentsu Group Inc.
  • Havas Group
  • IAC / InterActiveCorp
  • Integral Ad Science (IAS)
  • Microsoft Advertising
  • Omnicom Group Inc.
  • Outbrain Inc.
  • PubMatic Inc.
  • Quantcast
  • Rubicon Project
  • Snap Inc.
  • Taboola, Inc.
  • The Trade Desk, Inc.
  • Yahoo (Verizon Media)
  • Zeta Global

For more information about this report visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/r/s2zvry

About ResearchAndMarkets.com
ResearchAndMarkets.com is the world’s leading source for international market research reports and market data. We provide you with the latest data on international and regional markets, key industries, the top companies, new products and the latest trends.

Attachment

Sourced from Yahoo! finance

As its AI previews cut referral traffic, Google’s looking to help publishers continue to generate income, via a new promotional offering that will enable them to effectively gate their content, in order to drive more subscriptions, showcase more ads, etc.

Google’s new “Offerwall” system gives web publishers the option to add an additional pop-up alert when users visit their website, providing another means to drive direct action.

Google Offerwall

As you can see in this example, with Offerwall, publishers can insert additional promotions between content access.

As explained by Google:

When publishers choose to use Offerwall, they can offer audiences a number of ways to access content. People might decide to watch a short ad, complete a quick survey or pay in micro payments. Publishers can even add their own options, like newsletter sign-ups. These options empower audiences to decide how they want to access publishers’ sites and help ensure diverse content remains available to everyone.”

Click HERE to read the remainder of the article.

Sourced from Social Media Today

Publishers are once again at odds with Google — this time over AI-powered content summaries showing up right in search results. Google’s shift toward AI-first search might make things faster for users, but it’s throwing a wrench into how publishers get discovered and make money. With fewer clicks and more answers showing up instantly, publishers are left wondering what this means for long-term visibility and profitability. To ease the tension, Google has unveiled Offerwall, a fresh tool aimed at helping publishers earn in ways that don’t rely so heavily on traffic.

Google Ad Manager is integrating the new Offerwall feature, giving publishers fresh ways to make money beyond the usual ads. After testing with over 1,000 publishers, it’s now live and letting readers pick how they want to unlock content on paywalled sites: watch a short ad, take a quick survey, or toss in a small payment.

Why users may actually like this (hint: it’s not just ads)

This model works largely because people are already used to “Rewarded Ads”, where you gain access to content after watching an ad. And it’s paying off: according to Adapex (via TechCrunch), early users of Offerwall are seeing about a 9% boost in revenue.

At the same time, Google is teaming up with Supertab, a third-party platform that lets visitors unlock content with quick micro-payments. Still in beta, this feature also makes it easy to sign up for subscriptions and works hand-in-hand with Google Ad Manager.

Offerwall also gives publishers plenty of room to get creative. They can offer things like newsletter signups or free trial memberships instead. On top of that, Google uses AI to time the Offerwall perfectly for each visitor to boost engagement and revenue. That said, publishers still get the final say and set their own rules for when and how the Offerwall shows up if they’d rather stay in full control.

Google is pitching Offerwall as a big win for smaller publishers, especially those without the tech muscle to build their own paywalls or monetization setups. It plugs right into Google Ad Manager with barely any setup, giving smaller sites access to tools usually reserved for the big players. In short, it’s a simple way to level the playing field and open up more ways to earn.

By 

Sourced from Android Police

By

There’s a belief that we’re ditching web search for chatbots to find news, information and products. The truth is more complicated.

There are regular headlines suggesting chatbots like ChatGPT may be taking over for Googling. Maybe you’ve also started using artificial intelligence instead of Google to hunt for hiking boots, news about flooding in Texas or Roblox game tips.

To separate truth from belief, I dug into the numbers. What I found was that our use of chatbots is growing fast but that Google search still overwhelmingly remains our front door to find online news, information and products. Sorry, AI bros.

Web search may be losing some ground to AI, but we rely on it so much that chatbots are barely making a dent. The data suggests that Google has nearly 400 times the usage of ChatGPT for some news and information.

Chatbots for news

Similarweb, which studies our website activity, said last month that ChatGPT is a massively fast-growing way that Americans are finding online news articles.

About 25 million times from January through May this year, we landed on a news website after clicking a link in ChatGPT — up from just about 1 million times a year earlier, according to Similarweb. Wow.

(The Washington Post has a content partnership with ChatGPT owner OpenAI.)

But in the same five months, Americans landed on news websites about 9.5 billion times from using web search engines including Google and clicking on a link, Similarweb’s director of market insights, Laurie Naspe, confirmed.

Put another way, for every American who asked ChatGPT for information and landed on a news website to learn more, 379 people used Google to do the same thing.

Important caveats: We behave differently when using chatbots for information compared with web search engines.

Chatbots (including the “AI Overviews” in Google search) paraphrase information from news articles about Samsung’s latest smartphone or online reviews of air purifiers. You might rarely click a web link to find out more, as you do with conventional Google searches.

That behavior is causing carnage for websites and alters the Similarweb numbers. When we use ChatGPT to summarize news events and stop there, it doesn’t show up in Similarweb’s web click data.

However you interpret the numbers, Google remains for now a dominant way Americans find news websites.

Chatbots vs. search

A different report, by web analysis firm Datos by Semrush and software company SparkToro, found that about 11 out of every 100 of our website visits from a computer is to Google and other search engines. AI technologies — including ChatGPT, Google Gemini, Claude and more — account for less than 1 out of every 100 websites we visit combined.

The report shows a huge increase in the amount of web visits to chatbot sites in the past year, but we’re still using search websites many times more.

“Search is one of the most popular and fastest-growing features in ChatGPT,” an OpenAI spokesperson said. “We’re investing in a faster, smarter search experience and remain committed to helping people discover high-quality news and information.”

Google said it generally doesn’t comment about its market share.

SparkToro CEO Rand Fishkin did some related number crunching and found that chatbots were even punier compared with search.

He made educated assumptions to compare how often we’re using ChatGPT to find the kinds of information for which we’ve typically used Google, such as learning about the Golden Gate Bridge or comparing options for an air conditioner.

Fishkin found that we’re doing more than 14 billion Google searches a day compared with at most 37.5 million Google-like searches on ChatGPT. Google, in other words, has about 373 times the comparable usage of ChatGPT.

Important caveat: Fishkin’s educated guesses are just one data point. Fishkin also wasn’t counting our use of chatbots for tasks we don’t do in search, such as summarizing a long report or writing a bedtime story. And some of our time with Google search is now with its AI Overviews and AI Mode, though it’s hard to measure how much.

There have been other imperfect but useful analyses that have suggested we’re doing more Google searches and using chatbots more, too. At least hundreds of millions of people use ChatGPT each week, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said in April. While the numbers aren’t comparable, Google’s web search has nearly 5 billion users.

So are chatbots killing Google search?

The answer, like our habits, isn’t that simple.

In my conversations with people who oversee websites, some of them said they are overhauling their strategy to attract readers and viewers like you, because they believe fewer people will find them from web search links and more from chatbots. Your favorite websites are willingly or grudgingly adapting to chatbots that might kill them anyway.

It can also be true that we constantly misjudge how fast new technology is replacing our old habits.

It might feel as if people buy everything online, but e-commerce accounts for just 16 percent of all the stuff that Americans buy. Until very recently, Americans still spent more time watching conventional cable or free television than streaming on TVs, according to Nielsen.

And for now, the use of ChatGPT for news and other information remains puny.

“When everyone else is talking about it and the media’s writing about it, a new technology can feel far bigger than it is,” Fishkin said.

Feature image credit: Illustration by Elena Lacey/The Washington Post; iStock

By

Shira Ovide writes The Washington Post’s The Tech Friend, a newsletter about making your technology into a force for good. She has been a technology journalist for more than a decade and wrote a tech newsletter at the New York Times.

Sourced from The Washington Post

By Jen Mills

If you found this article via a search engine, it was probably Google.

In the UK, 90% of general search queries use the search engine, and more than 200,000 businesses rely on its advertising.

Now, the UK competition’s regulator has given an update in their investigation into whether Google has too much power, saying it is a ‘key gateway to the internet’ and may need to loosen its control.

The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) said today that it is minded to give the tech firm ‘strategic market status’, after starting to look into this in January.

This would require Google to follow certain rules around competition with other search engines and ad providers.

What could change for Google users?

At the moment, Google is the default search engine for Apple and Samsung phones in the UK after making deals with their makers, but in future this may have to change.

Users could be given a ‘choice screen’ to pick between search engines, in case they want DuckDuckGo, Bing, Ecosia, or something else instead.

A close up shot of a person using the google pixel phone in a canid scene against a clean background.
Google is the go-to for most of us, and that creates some complications (Picture: Getty)

It could be forced to introduce new ‘fair ranking’ measures for its search results, and avoid giving its own products preferential billing (such as YouTube or Google Maps).Advertising costs might indirectly become lower: the government-funded watchdog said that the amount spent by UK business entities for search advertising was equivalent to over £33,000 per advertiser and ‘if competition was working well, we would expect these costs to be lower.’

News publishers might get more control over how their content appears in search results and AI summaries, such as potentially more credit and direct links, as well as more extensive previews.

It might also become easier to port search data to another provider. The CMA said: ‘Innovative businesses struggle to compete as people can’t easily share their search data with firms developing innovative new services which could benefit them.’

Is this just in the UK?

The particular investigation by the CMA is, but there have been similar actions in other jurisdictions too.

In the US, Google may be forced to sell off part of its ad business after it was found to be too dominant, violating antitrust law.

Assistant Attorney General Abigail Slater said: ‘The Court’s ruling is clear: Google is a monopolist and has abused its monopoly power.

‘Google’s unlawful dominance allows them to censor and even deplatform American voices. And at the same time, Google destroyed and hid information that exposed its illegal conduct. Today’s opinion confirms Google’s controlling hand over online advertising and, increasingly, the internet itself.’

LONDON, UNITED KINGDOM - 2025/04/17: General view of the Google headquarters in King's Cross as the tech giant faces a 5 billion pound lawsuit in the UK for allegedly abusing its online search dominance. (Photo by Vuk Valcic/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images)
Google’s headquarters in King’s Cross (Picture: Getty)

The EU has also taken action to regulate Google under competition law.

Henna Virkkunen, Executive Vice-President for Tech Sovereignty, Security and Democracy, said: ‘Online search engines are the door through which users discover and find information, products and services.

‘Our initial view is that Alphabet, in the ranking of Google Search results, gives more prominence and treats its services, like shopping or travel, more favourably than similar services of third parties.

‘We also initially found that Alphabet was not enabling free offers and choice for developers and users on its Google Play app store, even though it is required to do so under the Digital Markets Act.

‘Both practices negatively impact many European and non-European businesses that rely on Google Search or Google Play to reach their users in the EU.’

What next for UK users?

Sarah Cardell, chief executive of the CMA, said: ‘Google search has delivered tremendous benefits – but our investigation so far suggests there are ways to make these markets more open, competitive and innovative.

‘Today marks an important milestone in our implementation of the new Digital Markets Competition Regime in the UK.

‘Alongside our proposed designation of Google’s search activities, we have set out a roadmap of possible future action to improve outcomes for people and businesses in the UK.

‘These targeted and proportionate actions would give UK businesses and consumers more choice and control over how they interact with Google’s search services – as well as unlocking greater opportunities for innovation across the UK tech sector and broader economy.’

A final decision on giving Google strategic market status in the UK is due to be made by October following a consultation process.

Google responded

In a blog post today, Oliver Bethell, then company’s senior director of competition, said: ‘The outcome could have significant implications for businesses and consumers in the UK.

‘The positive impact of Google Search on the UK is undeniable. Our tools and services contribute billions of pounds a year to the UK — £118 billion in 2023 alone.

‘The CMA has today reiterated that ‘strategic market status’ does not imply that anti-competitive behaviour has taken place — yet this announcement presents clear challenges to critical areas of our business in the UK. We’re concerned that the scope of the CMA’s considerations remains broad and unfocused, with a range of interventions being considered before any evidence has been provided.

‘Delivering certainty matters to businesses like ours that relentlessly invest in innovation. It also matters to every UK business that benefits from services like Search to reach customers — and to every user that relies on Search to get things done.

‘The UK has historically benefitted from early access to our latest innovations, but punitive regulations could change that. Proportionate, evidence-based regulation will be essential to preventing the CMA’s roadmap from becoming a roadblock to growth in the UK.

‘As we move into the next phase of this process, we will continue working constructively with the CMA to avoid measures that would limit opportunities for UK businesses and consumers.’

Feature Image Credit: Getty

By Jen Mills

Sourced from METRO

By Andile Masuku

Earlier this month, I found myself picking at something that’s been nagging at me of late. So I did what any insight-seeking strategist does these days – I asked X: “Who else is currently pondering answer engine and AI agent optimisation?”

The response from Ross Simmonds, the founder of Canadian B2B marketing agency Foundation and author of Create Once, Distribute Forever: How Great Creators Spread Their Ideas and How You Can Too, was immediate: a wave emoji. What ensued was a conversation that crystallises something you might be sensing.

How we got here

For the past two decades, Google has essentially owned the internet’s front door. Here’s how their empire worked: you searched for something, Google showed you ten blue links surrounded by adverts. If you wanted your business to appear in those results, you played by Google’s rules – either through search engine optimisation (SEO), where you twisted your content to please Google’s algorithms, or through AdWords, where you paid to appear at the top.

This system shaped everything. Entire industries sprang up around gaming Google’s preferences. Content creators wrote for robots first, humans second. Marketing budgets poured into deciphering what Google wanted, then delivering it.

Now that’s changing. Instead of ten blue links, we’re getting direct answers from AI systems like ChatGPT, Google Gemini, Perplexity, and dozens of others, including newer open source entrants like DeepSeek. Ask “What’s the capital of Mali?” and these tools simply tell you “Bamako” rather than sending you to Wikipedia or trying to sell you a holiday package.

New game

But here’s where it gets interesting, and where my conversation with Simmonds began. These new “answer engines” (as the digital content and marketing industries are starting to dub them) face the same fundamental challenge Google did: how do you make money from giving people information?

During our brief X exchange, I found myself describing what feels wrong about some of these new systems: “Imagine asking a shop assistant a basic question and instead of just answering, they stall – fishing for your intent, upselling alternatives, or quietly collecting your data to monetise your attention.”

I get it, though. These companies have raised billions in funding. They’ve got cutting-edge infrastructure to pay for, staff to employ, shareholders to satisfy. The idealistic vision of “just answer the question” crashes into commercial reality pretty quickly.

Where it gets complicated

Simmonds reckons that there’s going to be a split: “Information retrieval vs emotional connection. Many will rely on the AI to simply get information (i.e. how long should I bake my lasagne) but they’ll rely on emotional channels (podcasts, reels, TikToks and YouTube) to understand ‘how to make lasagne like a grandma from Tuscany.'”

This feels profound. We may well be creating two internet economies: one for facts, handled by machines a la AI agents, and another for meaning, still very much human territory.

Pattern recognition

I’m struck by my own experience developing and executing content strategies and tactical media plays for leading global organisations. Working on community-building assignments and ecosystem engagement projects, the most successful approaches weren’t about gaming Google’s algorithm or buying more AdWords.

They were about genuinely useful answers to real stakeholder questions, particularly from founders and investors, delivered through compelling media and meaningful in-person engagement.

But even then, I noticed that over-reliance on advertising channels like AdWords felt precarious. Not just because I’ve always been uncomfortable with hard-selling and hijacking people’s attention, but because at some fundamental level, sustainable business happens between people who trust each other.

Commercial reality

Here’s what I think is happening with these new AI systems, and why it matters for anyone trying to reach customers online: the companies building them are facing the same pressure Google did to figure out monetisation.

Some are optimising for keeping you on their platform longer. Others are cutting deals with specific information providers. Many are collecting detailed data about what you’re asking to build advertising profiles.

We’re already seeing the early signs: Perplexity’s licensing deals with (mostly) Western publishers, WPP’s digital marketing partnership with Claude (Anthropic), query limits for free users on various platforms, ‘premium’ answer tiers, and experiments with sponsored responses that prioritise certain sources over others.

Ultimately, for them, it’s just business. And that means that these systems are developing their own biases and blind spots, just as Google’s did.

The human element

By the end of our brief exchange, Simmonds and I found ourselves aligned on something: “…the lasting moat exists for people,” he said. The technical systems will evolve to handle the mechanical aspects of information delivery, but human connection, cultural context, and authentic perspective remain irreplaceable.

It’s not about choosing sides between human and artificial intelligence. It’s about recognising that as these new systems reshape how information flows, the premium on genuine human insight – the kind that feels personally and culturally grounded – is only going to grow.

Google’s two-decade reign over internet search might be ending, but the real question isn’t who’s won. It’s what kind of information ecosystem we’re building next, and whether we can do better than the attention-hijacking game that got us here in the first place.

Feature Image Credit: Solen Feyissa/Unsplash

By Andile Masuku

Andile Masuku is Co-founder and Executive Producer at African Tech Roundup. Connect and engage with Andile on X (@MasukuAndile) and via LinkedIn.

Sourced from IOL

*** The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of Independent Media or IOL.

By Priya Singh

Following layoffs of over 200 employees in May, Google is now offering voluntary buyouts to staff across several divisions as part of its ongoing restructuring efforts. Rather than issuing direct pink slips, the company is encouraging U.S.-based employees in teams like Search, Ads, Commerce, Engineering, Marketing, and Research to opt for a quiet exit with severance.

According to CNBC, this strategic move—targeting groups under the Knowledge & Information (K&I) umbrella—reflects Google’s attempt to streamline operations without triggering large-scale layoffs, though the total number of departures remains uncertain.

In an internal memo, Google’s K&I chief Nick Fox made it clear that the voluntary exit program is aimed at employees who may be disengaged or underperforming, offering them a respectful way out. For those thriving, the message was to stay focused, with Fox emphasizing the company’s ambitious goals and workload ahead. This approach is part of a broader shift in Google’s internal culture following the major layoffs in early 2023, with buyouts now being used more frequently as a quieter, less disruptive means of trimming the workforce.

However, these buyout offers come with strings attached—many are linked to Google’s renewed push for in-office work. Employees living within 50 miles of a Google campus are being encouraged, or subtly pressured, to return to a hybrid schedule. The shift reflects not just a workforce adjustment strategy but also Google’s evolving stance on remote work, suggesting that those unwilling to adapt may find the buyout route increasingly appealing.

Google is quietly reshaping its workforce by cutting internal training budgets and prioritizing AI-focused skill development, signalling a clear shift toward its AI-first strategy. Programs deemed non-essential are being sidelined, reinforcing the message that employees not aligned with this direction may not have long-term roles at the company. While the move from layoffs to voluntary buyouts has made restructuring less dramatic, the impact remains significant as Google sharpens its focus on future priorities.

By Priya Singh

Sourced from Mashable India

By

The nation of Romania has asked for Google and Meta to step in to banish black market advertising.

Romanian National Gambling Office (ONJN), the nation’s regulatory body, has complained to both search providers to take responsibility for these illicit organisations that can hoodwink willing bettors.

ONJN submits official complaints to Google and Meta

The regulatory body conducted an audit in February 2025, which discovered that Facebook, Facebook Messenger, and Google advertising all hosted avenues to illegal and black market providers of gambling.

The ONJN has questioned the Silicon Valley institutions, saying the regulator needs the data from Google and Meta to show the origins of these illegal adverts and to provide the root cause of the individuals who are continuing to make money from them.

Speaking at a conference titled “Fighting Financial Crime in Central Europe,” the President of the National Gambling Office, Vlad-Cristian Soare, was direct in addressing the threat that black market operators pose to the nation.

He said, “The black market in gambling is a social threat: players have no protection, and the state faces a significant risk to its economic and financial security.”

“It is estimated that, at EU level, of the total gambling revenues, over 70% go to the black market, and under 30% to the regulated (taxed) market,” Soare continued.

“The black market is extremely attractive to players: there is no taxation on winnings there, and the offers are often more tempting, as illegal organizers, not paying taxes, can present a much more attractive offer.”

This led to calls in the Romanian parliament to step up the pressure on Google and Meta for them to take responsibility for providing these illicit operators an opportunity to catch the eye of gamblers.

In the wake of the February audit, it was found that close to $1bn was lost in projected tax revenue between 2019 and 2023.

ONJN then faced criticism from members of the Save Romania Party (USR) who wanted their responsibilities for enacting regulations to be transferred to the Romanian national revenue office.

Feature Image Credit: Pixlr AI-generated.

By

Paul McNally has been around consoles and computers since his parents bought him a Mattel Intellivision in 1980. He has been a prominent games journalist since the 1990s, spending over a decade as editor of popular print-based video games and computer magazines, including a market-leading PlayStation title published by IDG Media. Having spent time as Head of Communications at a professional sports club and working for high-profile charities such as the National Literacy Trust, he returned as Managing Editor in charge of large US-based technology websites in 2020. Paul has written high-end gaming content for GamePro, Official Australian PlayStation Magazine,…

Sourced from readwrite