Tag

Mark Zuckerberg

Browsing

By

The CEO of Meta Platforms announces a new day in tech: conventional normality.

The party’s over.

In tech, this amounts to saying that the cool and Zen culture marked by an office transformed into a cosy lounge is over. Used to be we came, we entered and we were at home. The fridge was full; everyone helped themselves. The buffet was permanent.

The employee was in the centre. Work-life balance was the principle. The well-being of the employee came first. Companies were required to do everything to put their employees at ease to get the best out of them.

No more.

It’s all a distant memory now, says Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Meta Platforms  (META) – Get Free Report. Welcome to the real world, he proclaimed on March 14.

The social media emperor just announced the elimination of 10,000 additional jobs, after 11,000 jobs were cut last November. In all, the parent of Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp has cut 21,000 jobs in four months.

‘Year of Efficiency’

It’s not just the cuts themselves that’s striking here. It’s the tone with which Zuckerberg announced the new wave of austerity measures. He adopted the vernacular of the boss of an old-economy company. He was a cost-killer. He was cold. It’s isn’t personal; it’s just business. He was a normal boss.

“In our Year of Efficiency, we are focused on cancelling projects that are duplicative or lower priority and making every organization as lean as possible,” Zuckerberg wrote in a blog post.

He continued: “As part of the Year of Efficiency, we’re focusing on returning to a more optimal ratio of engineers to other roles. It’s important for all groups to get leaner and more efficient to enable our technology groups to get as lean and efficient as possible.”

He used the word “efficiency” fully a dozen times, including three times in the first two paragraphs. These two paragraphs are a catch-all of classic corporate lingo that says everything and nothing: “improve our financial performance,” “difficult environment,” “execute,” “optimize,” “workstreams,” “processes,” “changes,” “uncertainty,” and “focus.”

He sounds like the CEO of a traditional company. His post is a manual, a guide that other tech CEOs will use as well.

The tone is cold. And it changed. In November, when Zuckerberg announced the elimination of 11,000 jobs, he played the sensitive chord. He apologized.

“I want to take accountability for these decisions and for how we got here,” the CEO said at the time. “I know this is tough for everyone, and I’m especially sorry to those impacted.”

This time, there is none of that. He is not sentimental, as if to put a wall between him and those for whom the music just stopped and who were asked to go home while the evening was in full swing. He just killed the fun.

A New Normal

Tech and Silicon Valley now enter the normal corporate world. In this world, what matters is to please the markets. And markets like cost cuts. The employee is secondary. If you make big profits with the least possible cost, the markets applaud.

Interestingly, Zuckerberg’s announcements come at the same time as the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank, a major player in the startup ecosystem and in Silicon Valley.

The two events cannot be separated. Their symbolism is strong. It is the end of an era and the beginning of a new one, or rather the meeting of the old economy and the new one.

In case anyone still has any doubts, Zuckerberg also appears to be ending remote work at Meta. Tech companies previously backed off from from forcing employees back to the office.

“Our early analysis of performance data suggests that engineers who either joined Meta in-person and then transferred to remote or remained in-person performed better on average than people who joined remotely,” he said.

“This analysis also shows that engineers earlier in their career perform better on average when they work in-person with teammates at least three days a week.”

“I encourage all of you to find more opportunities to work with your colleagues in person.”

The party is over. It’s time to grow up, Zuckerberg seems to be saying.

One last tip to reflect on, while you’re on your way home: “I encourage each of you to focus on what you can control. That is, do great work and support your teammates.”

Tech workers: Welcome to a normal boss and a normal company.

By

Sourced from TheStreet

By

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg is claiming that the company’s WhatsApp messaging platform is “far more private and secure” than Apple’s iMessage platform. Zuckerberg’s claim came in a new Instagram post. Considering Meta’s entire business model is based on tracking and advertising, Zuckerberg’s claims can be considered somewhat iffy.

WhatsApp is far more private and secure than iMessage, with end-to-end encryption that works across both iPhones and Android, including group chats. With WhatsApp you can also set all new chats to disappear with the tap of a button. And last year we introduced end-to-end encrypted backups too. All of which iMessage still doesn’t have.

The post shares a Meta billboard in New York City that promotes WhatsApp over SMS or iMessage. Apple’s Tim Cook and Zuckerberg have long been in an ongoing battle of words.

During 2021, Facebook continued its public battle with Apple over changes in iOS and iPadOS that made it harder for companies to track users across other websites and apps. Facebook claimed Apple’s “App Tracking Transparency” hurts small businesses that rely on advertising to attract new customers. Zuckerberg went so far as to claim that Facebook’s lackluster growth in the last quarter of the year was partly to blame on Apple’s App Tracking Transparency.

In case you’ve forgotten, Meta, otherwise known as Facebook, was named the worst company of the year for 2021, according to a survey conducted by Yahoo Finance. The “honour” followed a bad year for the company, as it faced 12 months of public backlash, criticism from all quarters, and even a rebranding of the social media company.

By

Sourced from mactrast

By Brett Molina 

Facebook CEO and co-founder Mark Zuckerberg said he will “go to the mat” and fight efforts to break up the social networking giant, according to leaked audio from meetings with employees.

The leaked audio, obtained by tech site The Verge, originated from two meetings Zuckerberg held with Facebook employees in July.

The sessions covered a range of topics, including increased calls by lawmakers to break up Facebook. Zuckerberg said Facebook would legally challenge any efforts to split up the tech giant.

“We care about our country and want to work with our government and do good things, Zuckerberg said. “But look, at the end of the day, if someone’s going to try to threaten something that existential, you go to the mat and you fight.”

Zuckerberg also said breaking up Facebook, or other tech titans like Google and Amazon, won’t solve issues raised by lawmakers, including how they handle the spread of misinformation on their platforms.

“It doesn’t make election interference less likely,” Zuckerberg said. “It makes it more likely because now the companies can’t coordinate and work together.”

Warren hits back: Facebook’s Zuckerberg criticized her plan to break up big tech

Zuckerberg speaks out: Facebook CEO says breaking up social network wouldn’t help

Zuckerberg has long said Facebook shouldn’t be broken up despite calls seeking such a move, including from co-founder Chris Hughes, who wrote in a May op-ed for The New York Times that the power amassed by Zuckerberg is “unprecedented and un-American.”

Two weeks after that op-ed, Zuckerberg said on a call with reporters that a breakup would make tackling issues more challenging.

Feature Image Credit: Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg.

By Brett Molina

Follow Brett Molina on Twitter: @brettmolina23.

Sourced from USA Today

By 

  • Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg testified before Congress for over five hours on Wednesday, where he answered questions from senators on a broad range of subjects.
  • During an exchange with Senator John Cornyn, Zuckerberg laid out a simple explanation for how Facebook makes money with user data.
  • Zuckerberg’s explanation is a concise walkthrough of how your data is turned into profit.

You’re forgiven if you didn’t watch all five-plus hours of Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg answering questions during a joint Senate Judiciary and Commerce Committees hearing on Tuesday.

Even if you were watching, it’s entirely likely that you missed a crucial, brief segment around the two-hour mark, where Senator John Cornyn asked Zuckerberg about how Facebook handles ex-user data.

Though somewhat unrelated to what Senator Cornyn asked, Zuckerberg’s answer was a fascinating, concise look into how Facebook turns its vast quantity of user data into profit.

“There’s a very common misperception about Facebook — that we sell data to advertisers,” Zuckerberg said on Tuesday. “And we do not sell data to advertisers. We don’t sell data to anyone.”

Mark ZuckerbergFacebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg is surrounded by members of the media as he arrives to testify before a Senate Judiciary and Commerce Committees joint hearing regarding the company’s use and protection of user data, on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S.Reuters/Leah Millis

Indeed, Facebook makes it money through advertising. Facebook doesn’t provide data to advertisers — it does the work for them.

Here’s Zuckerberg explaining it to Senator Cornyn on Tuesday’s Senate hearing:

“What we allow is for advertisers to tell us who they want to reach, and then we do the placement. So, if an advertiser comes to us and says, ‘All right, I am a ski shop and I want to sell skis to women,’ then we might have some sense, because people shared skiing-related content, or said they were interested in that, they shared whether they’re a woman, and then we can show the ads to the right people without that data ever changing hands and going to the advertiser.”

In the wake of the Cambridge Analytica scandal, which revealed that at least 87 million Facebook users had their data used without consent by a political firm to influence elections (including the 2016 US Presidential election), general users, celebrities, tech executives and politicians have begun openly questioning Facebook’s handling of user data.

Facebook now admits fault for allowing third-parties to access user data inappropriately, which is what led to companies like Cambridge Analytica possessing user data in the first place. The company has since shut down loopholes in its social media service that allowed third-parties to “scrape” data from its users.

All that said, Facebook still directly relies on user data to make money — it’s just not in quite the way you may have thought.

Feature Image Credit: Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg testifies before a joint Senate Judiciary and Commerce Committees hearing.REUTERS/Aaron P. Bernstein

By 

Sourced from Business Insider UK