Author

editor

Browsing

By Greg Peters

AI is the biggest jolt of energy marketing has felt since the internet. Rather than fear it, smart operators will grab it and ride the wave.

In the Mad Men era of the 1960s, marketing lived in the boardroom, born from creative conversations and driven by strategy. The internet’s arrival in the mid-1990s flipped that world, pushing marketers from shaping big ideas to managing tactics like SEO, banner ads, pop-ups and content mills. Now AI is here, and the shifts feel constant. At a breakneck pace, it’s commoditizing once-core marketing tactics, doing the work so effectively that public opinion assumes machines can replace marketers.

Here’s where the pressure amps up: Clients and executives often don’t care how the work gets done, as long as it’s completed on time and within budget. You can manage revenue, risk, cost and cash flow however you see fit, as long as the numbers move in the right direction.

For some, that sounds terrifying and like a sure sign AI will decimate the creative process and eliminate jobs. But I’m here to tell you that this isn’t the end. You’re not going to lose your job to AI. But you could lose your job to someone who knows how to use it.

Creative Resistance And Adoption

You can see the resistance to AI playing out in the talent market. Countless writers have “open to work” on their LinkedIn profiles. The perceived value of writing has been eroded, hitting marketing intensely. AI makes tactics easier to access, so agencies and professionals must demonstrate that their work drives outcomes beyond what a tool can produce.

Those of us using AI daily know marketing has never stopped being valuable. Agencies need to demonstrate their value through tangible results. Smart AI adoption combined with expertise delivers faster, lasting outcomes. Understandably, the resistance often comes from creatives who are hesitant to adopt new tools out of fear.

I’ve always been a late tech adopter, but even I use ChatGPT. I rely on it for decks, engagement plans and strategy documentation. If I’m embracing it, the debate is over. The only question now is how to use it well.

Real-World Disruption In Action

Examples already show what this looks like. At my agency, we built an internal AI we call DirectorGPT. It captures our team’s knowledge so anyone can get quick answers without waiting for a senior lead. It saves time, facilitates onboarding and provides a reliable knowledge base. At the same time, agencies are experimenting with platforms that help analyse performance and optimize campaigns faster than ever before.

The lesson isn’t that agencies have no future. In fact, it’s a call to recognize where humans add the most value. Agencies must determine where AI is most effective and where human creativity remains essential. AI can generate a first draft of an email or a landing page. It can even create long-form narrative content and develop a brand strategy. But it can’t replace human creativity.

Inspired marketing pulls from culture, art, literature and even the bizarre. Think about campaigns that feel strange, yet stick because they capture attention in ways no tool could predict: A fast food brand sparring with competitors on social media. A beverage upstart disrupting the bottled water market with unconventional tactics.

True creativity takes something from one corner of culture and combines it with something unrelated to reveal something new. AI can’t make those leaps because it works only with what already exists. Humans can. When creatives use AI for mundane work, we gain time to focus on originality.

AI is the ultimate yes-man. It will flatter you into failure. It’s never going to push back and stop you from publishing something you’ll regret. The person behind the keyboard must be able to distinguish between good and bad. If those skills erode, teams will generate endless stale content that inspires no one to click, read or buy.

The Playbook For Using AI Right

Winning marketers will be the ones who use AI purposefully. These are the moves worth making:

• Leverage AI for speed. Summarize data, prepare talking points and cut down on research time.

• Build stronger engagement plans. Use AI to connect client objectives with practical marketing moves.

• Prompt with purpose. Iterate to refine results, and keep a library of the best prompts.

• Gut-check outputs. Never accept AI at face value. Apply human taste, style and critical thinking.

• Shift your lens to outcomes. Don’t view AI solely as a cost savings tool. Use it to drive outcomes and stay ahead.

Punk Rock Lessons For The Future

For me, adopting AI feels like punk rock. Punk was about breaking the rules, but the best musicians knew the rules first. It’s the same with AI—you must understand how the work is done before you can rebuild it with these tools.

The fear surrounding AI is loud, but like every disruptive technology, the noise will fade as adoption becomes commonplace. Conversations that feel urgent today will sound outdated soon. The same thing happened with the fax machine, the printer and the internet. Each one faced scepticism before becoming standard. AI is following the same path, albeit at a faster pace.

When the Spanish brought horses to North America, the indigenous Plains people had never encountered them before. Within a few generations, they’d incorporated horses into their way of life. They took a foreign technology and used it to leap forward. That’s what humans do. We harness technology and bound forward with it.

The tools are here, and the tide is rising. Marketing isn’t disappearing. It’s about to get more demanding, more creative and more fun. Grab hold, ride the wave and own it.

Feature image credit: getty

By Greg Peters

Find Greg Peters on LinkedIn. Visit Greg’s website.

COUNCIL POST | Membership (fee-based)

Greg Peters is the president and founder of 4B Marketing, a full-service tech marketing agency based in Denver, CO. Read Greg Peters’ full executive profile here.

Sourced from Forbes

By 

An emotional connection with fans is as important as on-field performance.

Your team’s on-field performance might be what dominates headlines – but it’s not the only consideration for sports brands looking for long-term growth. Building an emotional connection with both fans and wider audiences is just as critical. Simply having one of the best sports logos isn’t enough.

Commissioned by Conran Design Group, a new study titled Citizen Brands 2025: Solving the Connection Deficit looks at stakeholder expectations of sports brands today, as well as consumer perceptions of 170 cross-category brands in relation to key Citizen Brands attributes. What is a Citizen Brand? One that better connects to the people it sells to and the societies it operates within.

The study identifies a growing ‘connection deficit’– the widening gap between what consumers expect from brands and what they actually experience. In sport, this often manifests as a misstep between competitive success and emotional trust. Fans today want more than results: they want consistency, cultural identity, and values they can believe in.

With Citizen Brands, we’ve developed a framework that helps sports leaders connect to what matters for both the individual fan (reliability, betterment and originality) and wider society (inclusivity, environmentalism and contribution). This framework is proven to lead to higher purchase intent as well as stronger commercial growth: the top Citizen Brands generated up to 37% more revenue and saw 93% higher stock price growth over five years than their lower-performing counterparts.

In this year’s report, we looked at how brands like McLaren, the LA Lakers, Paris Saint-Germain, the All Blacks and Red Bull Racing stack up when it comes to activating Citizen Brand levers. It turns out it’s all to play for in sports.

Unlike brands in other categories, sports brands are underperforming on all Citizen Brand attributes. This leaves room for emerging category champions – brands able to connect and deliver at both individual and societal level, and drive growth in the process. So, what can sports brands do to strengthen these connections and drive business performance?

01. Double down on reliability and brand consistency

Of our six brand levers, ‘reliability’ is the top attribute driving commercial traction and positive sentiment. In this context, ‘reliability’ means more than smashing records or flying to the top of league tables: it’s about both dependable performance and the ability to consistently provide fan entertainment.

Take the LA Lakers: they might have only won one NBA title in the last 15 years, but through building assurance and visibility beyond performance, they outperform every other NBA team in terms of both brand valuation and social following.

Then you have the All Blacks: aside from their exceptional track record, they demonstrate reliability through one of the most consistent brand identities out there. For them, it’s about maintaining high standards on the pitch, but also ensuring the team’s values, visual identity and fan experience are reliably excellent year after year. This then keeps fans (and sponsors) invested for the long haul.

‘Betterment’, which is about improving the lives of your fans, both emotionally and functionally, was the second-highest lever driving consumer engagement for sports brands. The challenge isn’t just to engage fans for the duration of a match but to build an intimate relationship with them before, during and after. Fans now expect content and connection beyond the field of play; they want their team (or brand) to show up in unexpected ways to underline the value it offers.

Netflix’s Drive to Survive gave brands like Red Bull Racing and Ferrari the chance to go beyond the confines of the racetrack to drive engagement with fans (and create new fans along the way). Having dominated Formula 1 in recent years, Red Bull Racing are masters when it comes to dialling up ‘betterment’ during race weekends. From the VIP Paddock Club providing meet-and-greets and pit tours to festival-style fanzones with live DJs and interactive booths, they know how to entertain fans long after a podium finish.

Those looking to dial up ‘betterment’ should be thinking about designing a brand experience strategy that creates signature moments and content to enrich fan experience around the game or match itself.

02. Focus on originality to find your unique place in culture

‘Originality’ ranks as a critical driver of positive fan sentiment in sports. When a sports brand shows creativity, flair and authenticity in its branding, style or cultural collaborations, it can turn casual followers into devotees.

Being a fan (both diehard and more fair-weather) isn’t the same as being a consumer. As such, a sports brand’s origin story, history, rituals, glorious highs and crushing lows – and its ability to say something different – are key to building audience connection. In addition, top-performing brands are able to reveal their unique cultural relevance in a broader sense.

Take Paris Saint-Germain (PSG), a brand that leverages a sense of originality to expand its off-field reach. In attaching the brand to the DNA of Paris and the world of fashion through brand partnerships with Michael Jordan (Nike), Dior and Koché and celebrity endorsements, it has become a true lifestyle beacon, capturing the attention of audiences inside and outside football.

03. The long-term payoff: loyalty, equity and growth

The sports brands that will dominate in the next decade aren’t just the ones with the silverware. They’re the ones that balance emotional connection with performance –- making the fans feel something deeper: emotional equity.

Leaders wanting a slice of the pie need to look at how to best leverage a sense of reliability, originality and betterment through their brand activations. The most successful will be those who look beyond the confines of the game to cultivate ‘fans’ rather than customers and ‘communities’ instead of audiences.

Feature image credit: Nike / Future

By 

Anaïs Guillemané Mootoosamy is Strategy Managing Director at Conran Design Group.

Sourced from Creative Bloq

By Roger Dooley

Walmart is experimenting with paper catalogues. Yes, you read that correctly. The retail giant that helped drive countless catalogue companies out of business is now testing the very medium many considered dead, according to RetailWire. It’s only been a few years since Sears, the company that essentially invented American catalogue shopping, filed for bankruptcy. Now, Walmart is discovering what neuroscience researchers have been saying all along: paper has unique psychological advantages that digital cannot replicate.

As someone who co-founded a catalogue company years before e-commerce transformed retail, I find this development both ironic and validating. For more than a decade we enjoyed creating catalogues that our customers eagerly anticipated. Receiving a catalogue filled with both new and familiar products was a consumer experience totally unlike the always-on, 24/7/365 world of e-commerce. Less convenient, to be sure, but often more fun.

The Counterintuitive Psychology Behind Walmart’s Strategy

Walmart’s home furnishings catalogue, launched in August, is apparently performing well for what looks like a nostalgic throwback. The company reports that engagement and impression figures “soundly beat” their expectations, with the catalogue serving as what SVP Creighton Kiper calls a tool for “top-of-mind consideration, awareness and reappraisal.”

What Walmart has discovered aligns with neuroscience research I’ve been writing about for years. Temple University researchers using fMRI brain scans found that physical ads cause greater activation in the ventral striatum—the brain area most predictive of purchase intent—than digital ads. This shows a fundamental difference in how our brains process information.

The research shows paper advertising requires 21% less cognitive effort to process than digital media. Brand recall is 70% higher for direct mail pieces compared to digital ads. Perhaps most importantly for retailers like Walmart, physical materials produce more brain responses connected with internal feelings, suggesting greater “internalization” of the marketing message.

Why Digital-First Retailers Are Rediscovering Print

The timing of Walmart’s catalogue experiment is particularly strategic. As marketing expert Polly Wong notes in the RetailWire piece, digital targeting through algorithms gives marketers “about a 20% chance of reaching who you want to when you want to.” Meanwhile, a physical catalogue can sit on a coffee table for weeks, getting multiple views and perhaps being shared among household members. My own experience showed that orders would keep coming many weeks after the catalogue reached the customer’s mailbox.

This multi-touch exposure is crucial for home furnishings—a category where purchases are considered, aspirational, and often discussed among family members. Unlike a fleeting Instagram ad or a quickly deleted email, a catalogue becomes what marketers call a “brand artifact” in the consumer’s physical space.

As I noted in my 2015 Forbes piece, paper’s advantages stem from how it engages our spatial memory networks. Physical material is more “real” to the brain—it has meaning and place. This is particularly important for home furnishings, where customers are literally trying to visualize products in their own spatial environment.

Digital, of course, has its own advantages in this space. Room visualizations, for example, can’t happen in a static piece of paper.

The Strategic Implications for CMOs

Walmart’s catalogue isn’t trying to recreate the 600-page Sears wish book of yesteryear. Instead, it’s a curated, shoppable experience enhanced with QR codes—a perfect example of making paper and digital work together rather than in competition.

For CMOs, this suggests several strategic considerations:

Reframe the Print vs. Digital Debate: It’s not about choosing one over the other. The most effective strategies leverage paper’s superior emotional engagement and memory encoding with digital’s convenience and measurability.

Consider Category Fit: Home furnishings, fashion, luxury goods—categories requiring inspiration and emotional connection—may benefit disproportionately from print’s psychological advantages. Beautiful product photography in a large format creates desire in ways a smartphone screen simply cannot.

Target the Attention Economy Differently: With digital advertising becoming increasingly cluttered and ignored, physical mail represents what might be called “white space” in the consumer’s attention. One well-designed catalogue might generate more engagement than hundreds of digital impressions.

Measure Beyond Click-Through Rates: Walmart’s success metrics included “impressions and engagement,” but the real test will be whether catalogue recipients show increased lifetime value. The neuroscience suggests they will, as physical media creates stronger emotional connections and brand associations.

The Pendulum Swings Back (Slightly)

The death of print has been greatly exaggerated. While we’re never returning to the days when the Sears catalogue was Amazon-before-Amazon, smart retailers are recognizing that paper serves a unique psychological function that digital cannot fully replace.

Walmart’s experiment suggests we’re entering a more sophisticated era of omnichannel marketing. For CMOs willing to challenge digital-only orthodoxy, paper might just be the differentiator that cuts through the digital noise.

Is your brand missing out on paper’s unique ability to create lasting emotional connections with customers? As Walmart is demonstrating, sometimes the future of retail looks surprisingly like the past—but, with better data to explain why it works.

Feature image credit: Getty Images

By Roger Dooley

Find Roger Dooley on LinkedIn and X. Visit Roger’s website. Browse additional work.

Sourced from Forbes

By Aaron Baar

The grocery delivery platform is the first retail media partner to enable targeting and end-to-end measurement directly within TikTok’s ad platform.

Dive Brief: 

  • Instacart is collaborating with TikTok on a program that will integrate the company’s retail media network data into the platform’s Ads Manager, the companies announced in a press release.
  • Select CPG advertisers soon will be able to use Instacart data for targeting and measurement, and to enhance their shoppable ad formats. Instacart is integrating its purchase and grocery selection data directly into TikTok Ad Manager.
  • The integration makes Instacart the first retail media network to offer marketers end-to-end capabilities natively on TikTok, according to release details. The move follows other recent efforts from Instacart designed to boost its appeal to advertisers.

Dive Insight:

With the TikTok integration, Instacart aims to establish itself as the most advertiser-friendly media network, providing its data to help brands reach new and motivated audiences with minimal friction. While other retail media networks have worked with TikTok on specific campaigns, Instacart is “the first to work with Tiktok [on] what we’re calling an end-to-end integration,” Ali Miller, Instacart’s general manager of advertising, told Adweek.

That means advertisers will soon be able to use Instacart’s audience segments to better target campaigns on TikTok’s platform to reach consumers with high purchase intent. Additionally, they will be able to enhance shoppable formats through TikTok’s Smart+ campaigns, which are integrated with Instacart grocery selection data. Advertisers will also be able to measure campaign and conversion performance through a closed-loop platform.

Instacart claims to have more than 7,500 active brands and 1,800 retail partners in its ecosystem, giving it a robust pool of data for its retail media network. The TikTok partnership is part of the company’s strategy to help marketers cut through fragmentation and complexity by allowing them to tap into Instacart’s retail media data wherever they’re already buying media, per release details.

Beyond its latest move, Instacart recently announced a partnership with Pinterest to make ads on the platform shoppable via the grocery delivery service. The company also expanded its partnership with The Trade Desk to integrate its grocery selection data on the programmatic company’s platform, enabling advertisers and agencies to use specific criteria to build first-party custom audiences.

By Aaron Baar

Sourced from MarketingDive

By Mark Ritson

New ads for ChatGPT scored low on fluency—and even lower on branding basics

OpenAI’s recent ads for ChatGPT were everywhere—NFL Primetime, streaming platforms, outdoor, and beyond. Press coverage hailed the AI company’s biggest marketing push yet as a new chapter of AI brand building.

But few pointed out just how incredibly poor the ads were.

Set aside the irony of an AI company relying on traditional media to promote its product. Focus instead on the dire creative quality of the two TV spots, Pull-Up and Dish.

Research firm System1 tested both ads with a representative panel of U.S. consumers. The results confirm that while AI tech bros continue to kill it with product development, they’re lightyears behind on the rest of the marketing challenge.

Both ranked in the lowest quintile for long-term growth and short-term sales impact. That’s incredibly bad, even for the tech category, which always underperforms.

Worse, both scored dismally on fluency—System1’s measure of whether consumers actually know which brand is being advertised to them.

Source: System1 FluencyTrace real time testing of “Pull-Up”

The Pull-Up ad managed a fantastically bad fluency score of 59. That means only 59% of viewers–who were being paid to watch the ad with their full attention–knew what was being advertised. In System1’s real-time assessment above, you can see a black ocean of ignorance engulfing the audience. A disappointingly small hump of pink recognition kicks in two seconds before the end, when ChatGPT’s logo appears.

This is the definition of bad advertising, standing in rude contrast to the sea of pink when KFC or Apple or Mars ads are tested.

Source: System1 FluencyTrace real time testing of Twix “Two Bears” Ad

And that’s just real-time fluency, not the tougher and more important metric of branded recall among unpaid, inattentive audiences with a memory-shredding delay before being quizzed. Most studies conclude that just around half of all advertising achieves branded recall.

Now back to the killer ratio: half of the ads aired in America can’t even communicate what product they are selling.

There’s a simple explanation: Most marketers are too involved in their product. Most agencies are too interested in their storytelling. Both miss market orientation.

They don’t realize that consumers don’t care about their product, don’t focus on advertising, and have a bazillion more important things to think about. This total lack of involvement contrasts directly with professionals spending eight hours a day fixated on one brand and a thirty-second masterpiece. We make ads in exact inversion to how they’re consumed.

Bad advertisers assume a single whiff of a logo at the end is enough—like a Hitchcock movie revealing its triumphant conclusion in the final frames. Brands with a more advanced grasp of effectiveness know better. They use distinctive assets from the outset to ensure immediate recognition at the start, throughout, and after. They squeeze value from every pixel they paid for.

Andrew Tindall’s “Rule of 7” is instructive here. His analysis of a giant Effie database suggests a brand needs seven distinctive assets in a thirty-second ad to achieve 100% branded recall. Not seven different assets—just seven repetitions of the colours, shapes, and other elements in your asset palette. And no, that doesn’t limit creativity. It challenges it to work harder toward its true purpose: advertising effect and sales.

Achieving branded recall and maintaining distinctiveness is crucial for all brands. But it’s especially critical for AI brands like ChatGPT, which are incredibly generic. They all look the same, operate the same, work off each other, launch innumerable product iterations, and fall blandly into a big, grey AI bucket.

While AI awareness is near-universal among Americans, most people don’t see any difference between AI providers. Menlo Ventures found that “most people don’t distinguish between older assistants like Alexa and Siri and newer large language models like ChatGPT and Claude. It’s all the same.” I don’t know which AI models I’m currently subscribed to. Do you?

Distinctiveness will be crucial in the next chapter of AI. There are too many competing brands. The two or three that survive won’t necessarily carve a differentiated position, but they’ll come to mind first by standing out. The route to that escape starts with making ads that don’t score a 59 for fluency.

Perhaps the geniuses at OpenAI should have asked their own chatbot for advice. When I did exactly that yesterday, ChatGPT—unlike the company behind it—played it perfectly:

Prompt: Assess the new Pull-Up ad from ChatGPT against the laws of advertising effectiveness and score it out of 10.

ChatGPT-5: Pull-Up is strategically on-brief and nicely made, but it underweights distinctive assets and mid-ad branding, so it risks becoming a likeable, generic “AI-helped me” story rather than a memorable ChatGPT ad that builds future sales.

Score: 5/10

Mark Ritson is a former marketing professor, brand consultant and award winning columnist. He is the founder of the MiniMBA in Marketing, which teaches all the many laws of advertising effectiveness as part of its outstanding syllabus. 

By Mark Ritson

Mark Ritson has a PhD in Marketing and spent 25 years working as a marketing professor, and has also worked as both a global brand consultant and as the in-house brand consultant for LVMH. His articles have appeared in the Sloan Management Review, Harvard Business Review, the Journal of Advertising and the Journal of Consumer Research.

Sourced from adweek

Sourced from what’s trending

Summary:

  • Have you ever added items to your cart due to bonus offers? It’s a deliberate marketing strategy. Temu gamifies shopping.
  • Gamification in online shopping uses casino-style tactics to push buyers into purchasing more products. Variable rewards drive consumer behaviour.
  • Learn 5 ways to outsmart gamified marketing. Understand the illusion of savings and avoid impulse purchases. Take back control.

Have you ever found yourself adding items to your cart just because of a bonus offer you stumbled across? That wasn’t an accident. It’s a deliberate and highly successful marketing strategy.

Internet bazaars like Temu have gone through the roof in popularity as much for their apparently unbeatable prices as because of how they gamify shopping. One of their flashiest attractions is the promise of “big bonus discounts.” Their casino-style mechanisms that give users discounts, vouchers, or credits, at first glance seem to be a nice bonus. In fact, they are a quiet but powerful tactic to push buyers into putting more products into their baskets.

How Gamification Works in Online Shopping

Gamification—the application of game elements in a non-game environment—has become a routine strategy in online marketing. Fitness apps reward users with badges, banks give streak rewards, and e-learning sites provide points.

In the retail environment, however, gamification has special potency because it relates directly to expenditure. Temu and similar apps incorporate “prize wheel” into the user experience to simulate the thrill of the slot machine, providing an opportunity to “win” coupons, further discounts, or even free shipping. This is a tactic borrowed from the online gaming world, where free spins are popular form of casino bonus.

Every spin is a small win. Even a small reward—such as a few dollars taken off or a percentage discount—instils a sense of urgency. Consumers feel they have “earned” a prize and are motivated to use it before it runs out, which makes them purchase goods they otherwise would not have.

The Illusion of Savings: Understanding “Cart Creep”

Spin-the-wheel offers present discounts in the guise of fortune, redirecting consumers from considering need to grabbing a “prize.” Coupons usually come with minimum spends that encourage individuals to put more into their carts.

Hooked by Habit

Temu’s free spins aren’t a novelty that happens just once. They are replenished every day, often several times a day, entering a pattern of habit-based use. Even if consumers don’t intend to make a purchase, the temptation of a free spin lures them back into the app, where new items and lightning sales beckon.

This behaviour is based on behavioural economics. The variable reward—the thrill of not knowing what you’ll get—creates an exciting experience for the user. This unpredictability causes dopamine release in the brain, which gets the behaviour reinforced. Every spin not only keeps the app front of mind but also keeps the shopper pre-primed to buy something whenever they look at a “good deal.”

Shoppers often start with one or two items but end up with a full basket—a phenomenon dubbed “cart creep.” Spin-the-wheel deals push buyers to add more turning a $20 plan into a $65checkout. Similar tactics such as mystery boxes and lucky draws are used in flash sale sites to keep customers engaged. This is the same reason for the viral popularity of Labubu’s blind box strategy.

5 Ways to Outsmart Gamified Marketing

Getting to know these strategies is the most important step in shopping smart. Useful tips are:

Pause before spinning. Ask yourself whether you were going to purchase something prior to the offer. If not, then you’re likely being enticed by the game.

Read the fine print. Coupons mostly come with minimum spends or expire after hours, which promotes impulse purchasing.

Make a list. Hold yourself to things you really need rather than wandering through aimlessly to “spend” your prize.

Estimate actual savings. A 20% discount on something you don’t need isn’t saving money—it’s spending money.

Take advantage of a cooling-off period. If you find yourself vulnerable to a spin reward, wait a few hours before checking out. The rush will wear off, making rational decisions easier.

By treating “free spins” as a marketing strategy instead of an actual bonanza, you take back control over your shopping.

The Bottom Line

By combining entertainment and commerce, sites such as Temu have gamified online shopping. Spins for free and surprise rewards make it seem as though everyone triumphs. But in the end, the winner is usually the site itself, as it gains more engagement and bigger cart sizes.

Consumers aren’t hopeless, however. Learning how these strategies operate enables you think twice and not succumb to the trap of wastefulness.

Feature image credit: appshunter.io on Unsplash

Sourced from what’s trending

By Zak Doffman

Updated, Oct. 21 with an industry response to Google’s retreat on user privacy.

Apple warns iPhone users to stop using Google Chrome, and Microsoft has issued the same warning for Windows users. Now Google has confirmed more bad news for Chrome’s more than 3 billion users. Is it time to quit the world’s most popular browser?

Google’s plan to kill tracking cookies in Chrome centred on its Privacy Sandbox. This explored alternatives to cookies, seeking a balance between user privacy, the ad industry and regulators. That balance was never found. The focus on privacy is over.

Google has suddenly confirmed privacy initiatives “are being phased out.” The Privacy Sandbox, now in its sixth year, has essentially ended just months after Google confirmed tracking is here to stay and there are no viable alternatives.

The scale of this reversal is huge. “Google’s Privacy Sandbox is officially dead,” AdWeek reports, with Google telling the industry outlet “the entire project is being retired.”

The Privacy Sandbox has been fraught with issues since its inception. Its first initiative, the so-called Federated Learning of Cohorts (FLoC) was infamously pilloried by Apple’s “Flock” remake of Hitchcock’s “The Birds,” promoting Safari at Chrome’s expense.

The list of initiatives now retiring “in light of their low levels of adoption,” include: Attribution Reporting API, IP Protection, On-Device Personalization, Private Aggregation, Protected Audience, Protected App Signals, Related Website Sets, SelectURL, SDK Runtime and Topics. In short, pretty much everything.

Responses to Google’s confirmation that the Privacy Sandbox is essentially dead have been are stark. Per Gizmodo, “Google just quietly killed something you may never have used or heard of: Privacy Sandbox. You should grieve this death anyway, because the implications are grim. This basically means six years’ worth of work toward ending third-party cookies in Chrome—which might have ultimately made cookies obsolete across all major browsers — has amounted to nothing.”

PPC Land says “Chrome kills most Privacy Sandbox technologies after adoption fails. Google retires nine Privacy Sandbox APIs following years of development, low uptake, and widespread industry criticism of the cookie replacement initiative.”

“Google has killed Privacy Sandbox,” Engadget says.

The irony for privacy advocates is that none of the negative headlines in the last two years — including stay of execution for tracking cookies and rebirth of digital fingerprinting — have dented Chrome’s dominance on mobile or desktops.

Chrome now has more than 70% of both the mobile and desktop global markets. The only threat on the horizon comes from new AI browsers, including Perplexity’s Comet and an eagerly anticipated option from Open AI.

There again, Google is rushing out advanced to maintain its lock, with its recent Gemini in Chrome upgrade designed to keep the upstart AI browsers at bay. Again, privacy warnings have already been issued, with Gemini harvesting more user data than the alternatives. But, again, it seems unlikely to make a difference to user adoption.

That said, Gizmodo warns “with Privacy Sandbox completely gone, it’s clear that somewhere along the line, the long deferred plan fizzled. Individual tracking of users is a load-bearing structure of the free, ad-supported internet, and that’s not about to change.” And when it comes to Google’s stewardship of the global internet, perhaps that’s the most surprisingly unsurprising news of all.

If there’s a root cause behind the death of Google’s Privacy Sandbox, it’s the tech giant’s precarious balancing act. It plays both game-keeper by safeguarding user privacy interests, and poacher, as the primary beneficiary from the digital ad industry it created.

Ultimately, the industry feared that killing cookies would benefit Google through its unique insider position at their expense, where on every level, any replacement for tracking cookies would water down their ability to track users across the web.

But for the industry we’re possibly now more in an uneasy limbo-land than a settled, long term solution for the privacy versus tracking tension that dominates big tech. Per Search Engine Land, “Google’s shutdown of Privacy Sandbox ends cookie chaos for now but leaves the future of privacy-first advertising uncertain.”

The ad industry-focused website says “the Privacy Sandbox was Google’s answer to growing privacy regulation and industry backlash against cross-site tracking — but its complexity, limited adoption, and regulatory scrutiny stalled momentum. At last, Google is no longer forcing a shift away from third-party cookies, preserving the familiar targeting and measurement tools that power much of digital advertising.”

But this comes with a warning: “While this offers short-term stability and fewer disruptions to campaign performance, it also signals that true privacy-safe ad solutions are still unresolved, leaving the industry without a clear path forward as regulators and browsers continue tightening data rules. In short — advertisers get breathing room today, but more uncertainty tomorrow.”

It’s no easier now to work through what happens longer term than it was six years ago, when the demise of tracking cookies was promised and Privacy Sandbox was born. This has proven an impossible problem to reconcile. The disappointment now is that users have paid the price for a schism at the heart of the online ad ecosystem.

You are being tracked on the browser most of you use, despite a promise that would stop. And there’s now no end in sight. Ultimately, perhaps that’s all that matters. And it comes as AI browsers are set to disrupt the entire ecosystem like never before.

Feature image credit: dpa/picture alliance via Getty Images

By Zak Doffman

Find Zak Doffman on LinkedIn and X.

Sourced from Forbes

By Dax Dasilva • Edited by Micah Zimmerman 

What consumers need from physical stores — and how retailers can rise to meet it — is evolving fast.

Key Takeaways

  • Shoppers don’t crave human interaction — they value expertise, efficiency and immediate product availability.
  • Retailers must leverage technology to personalize experiences, streamline checkout and strengthen supply chain reliability.
  • Physical stores remain relevant by focusing on curation, expertise and delivering value beyond convenience.

Nothing beats the human touch of a helpful salesperson, right?

Wrong.

For so long, retailers have been told that what sets brick-and-mortar apart is the “human element.” But a landmark new survey shows exactly the opposite: roughly half of younger consumers prefer a shopping experience that lets them avoid other people. Convenience and efficiency loom large here: more than three-quarters of Gen Z and millennial shoppers regularly choose online purchases and curbside or in-store pickup.

All of which raises the existential question: Why do we even have stores anymore, anyway?

The answer isn’t quite as bleak as it might seem. Physical stores have always served a central need for shoppers, and I don’t see that changing. But exactly what that need is — and how retailers can rise to meet it — is evolving fast.

Why retailers can’t count on the human element

First, though, when and why did human interaction become kryptonite for shoppers?

No surprises here: Covid was the accelerant, creating a wealth of possibilities for buying stuff with minimal human contact. On top of already abundant e-commerce options, we suddenly had new curbside pickup and delivery choices.

Throw in new norms for remote working, and that meant never having to chit-chat with anyone IRL.

Of course, the whole IRL thing was already on its way out, anyway. Today, nearly half of teens are constantly online, and 40% of Gen Z say they’re more comfortable communicating digitally than in person. For better or worse, digital interaction has become the predominant way we engage with the world.

All of that adds up to a major challenge for today’s brick-and-mortar retailers: How do you get shoppers in-store who don’t want to leave the house?

The answer requires not so much rethinking as remembering the role that stores play. After all, about 80% of transactions still take place in-store.

That’s not because of some touchy-feely human element — cheesy greeters, schmoozy salespeople, chatty checkout clerks — and it never was. It comes down to adding value, something that not just young shoppers but all shoppers prioritize.

The act of shopping in-store represents an exceptionally efficient way to browse, try, compare and learn. Smart retailers are increasingly leaning into those advantages, and they’re leveraging tech to do it — finding ways to personalize, customize and streamline the in-store experience for digitally native younger shoppers.

Here’s what I’ve seen working on the front lines with thousands of merchants around the world.

Expertise still matters

Small talk and schmoozing may be out. But genuine expertise is always in demand. And there’s arguably no substitute for speaking with an expert staff member who offers personalized service.

A couple of summers ago, in my hometown of Montreal, I bought a bike at Rebicycle, which assembles its rides from recycled components. For newbies, there’s a lot to learn about putting all of those pieces together, from the perfect seat to the right brakes to the ideal tire width. Talking to an expert in-store helped me reach the right decision in minutes… instead of hours searching online.

If Gen Z and Millennial shoppers are all about efficiency, it really doesn’t get much better. Even an AI chatbot can’t compete with a seasoned staff member who knows you, knows the merchandise and knows the stock.

Retailers are increasingly turning to tech to enhance this kind of in-store expertise. New apps, for example, turn any handheld device into a repository of product knowledge, letting staff of all experience levels easily share specs, insights and availability with customers.

The right stock is everything

Physicality and immediacy are two big things stores have going for them. You can physically try out what you’re looking for. And you can take it home immediately, right then and there. Even Amazon can’t top that.

But only if it’s in stock.

There’s nothing more frustrating than traipsing to a store, only to find something sold out (like that soy candle from my favourite downtown boutique — c’mon, guys, your site said two available!).

When it comes to stock, younger shoppers are especially antsy. Rather than wait for an item to be restocked, they’re willing to spend more to get it right away from another merchant.

So, how can retailers ensure they’ve got the right merchandise at the right time?

Seasonality forecasting is critical — i.e., making sure there’s enough stock during busy seasons and not too much at other times. To stock their stores, many retailers still rely on forecasting models that only tap recent sales data — or just go on gut instinct. That can leave them with empty shelves at the most important times of year. New tools remove the guesswork, drawing on historical sales trends to make order recommendations for seasonal products.

Supply chains are another pinch point — especially with tariffs wreaking havoc on inventories everywhere. Big merchants typically have access to alternate suppliers who can fill the gaps, but for smaller retailers, one hiccup can spell disaster. The good news is that new platforms are democratizing supply chain access, giving smaller stores access to the same vast global sourcing network as major retailers.

Avoid the bad checkout buzz kill

In a world where shoppers demand efficiency, checkout is an overlooked chance for brick-and-mortar retailers to set themselves apart.

For nine out of 10 consumers, a smooth checkout plays a major role in whether or not they return to a retailer. And eight out of 10 will avoid a business with a line-up, with 40% of that group either heading to a competitor or simply abandoning their purchase.

Self check-out to the rescue? Nope.

Unsurprisingly, two-thirds of consumers say they’ve used a dysfunctional self-service kiosk. Clunky tech is costing retailers money, too: 15% of shoppers admit using self-checkout to steal, and almost half of those folks plan to do it again.

A better way? I’m seeing more retailers arm their salespeople with handheld POS devices, capable of tabulating a customer’s order and even checking out, on the go. Not rocket science, but surprisingly effective.

An added advantage here: personalization. The latest tools can call up customer histories and preferences, enabling salespeople to offer additive suggestions or flag sale items… instead of just going for the hard sell. For a generation primed on online algorithms and recommendations, this feels second nature.

Shoppers’ preferences around human interaction in stores may wax and wane. One person’s friendly clerk might be another’s pushy salesperson. But ultimately, everyone — young or old — is seeking value in their in-store experience. Smart retailers know that personalization, curation and efficiency never go out of style.

By Dax Dasilva 

Dax Dasilva is the CEO and founder of Lightspeed Commerce, the unified POS and payments platform for ambitious entrepreneurs. He is also the founder of Age of Union, an environmental alliance that has invested $40 million in protecting critical species and ecosystems.

Edited by Micah Zimmerman 

Sourced from Entrepreneur

By Hannah Bowler,

Ogilvy UK will no longer work with influencers who distort or retouch their bodies or faces for brand campaigns in a bid to combat social media’s “systemic” mental health harms.

Dove already doesn’t work with influencers that edit content.

Speaking exclusively to The Drum, Ogilvy’s head of influence Rahul Titus said influencer marketing is “supposed to be the authentic side to marketing, but now it churns out such staged content that is so harmful to anybody looking at social media”.

Ogilvy’s policy comes as the UK government reviews the Digitally Altered Body Image Bill that would require an influencer to disclose edited content. The bill is on its second review in parliament but is struggling to make it through the proposal process. Titus hopes Ogilvy’s commitment to stop working with influencers who alter their images will help the bill get passed.

“We have a duty of care as marketers, as agencies and brands to the next generation of people so they don’t grow up with the same stuff we are seeing now,” says Titus.

He acknowledges that brands have “dipped their toes” in unedited influencer images, but they always fall back on running misguided anti-editing campaigns rather than implementing sweeping change.

“A lot of research has gone into this. We’ve been working with our behavioural sciences team and talking to a lot of influencers and we’ve spent a lot of time figuring out how to make it work.”

The ban applies to all parts of the Ogilvy UK group, which counts the likes of Dove among its clients. Dove’s global vice president external communications and sustainability, Firdaous El Honsali, came out in support of the policy. “We are delighted to see our partner Ogilvy tackling this topic. Dove only works with influencers that do not distort their appearance on social media – and together with Ogilvy and our community of influencers, we have created several campaigns that celebrate no digital distortion,” El Honsali says.

Ogilvy will roll out the policy in two phases. Starting next month, Titus’s team will be consulting with brands and influencers on the policy, and in May it will implement the ban. Titus has set a December deadline for a complete end to the editing of all sponsored or paid-for content in influencer activations.

“It’s easy for us to sit here and say ’there is a systemic issue, so we aren’t going to work with these types of influencers,’ but that’s not the solution and it won’t make the change we want to see. So we are going to take the time and consult our clients and put the plan in place.”

How will it work in practice?

  • Ogilvy will no longer work with influencers who retouch their skin or bodies, but will allow work that edits the contrast or brightness. The ASA’s beauty filter standards will be enforced in the UK.
  • Ogilvy will use its InfluenceO tech stack to detect when images have been retouched.
  • Briefs will be made more flexible to allow for more authenticity from the start. Titus says: “We need to educate our clients to give influencers the freedom to express themselves a little bit more.”

Ogilvy also expects its quarterly diversity audits, put in place in 2020, will serve a secondary purpose of improving influencer diversity and, over time, naturally start working with less edited Influencers. “We are hoping that by improving influencer diversity, the type of influencers that brands work with will change to be more representative of the population.”

Titus is realistic that the policy will need time and for the rest of the industry to get behind the ban. “We are talking about reversing 10 years of social media behaviour and that’s not going to happen in two months. We know that what we are putting in place we will not see any immediate benefits for the next five years. It’s too big a project and that’s OK.”

Ogilvy hopes the policy will “set off a chain reaction” in the industry and Titus urges other members of the influencer marketing industry to approach him for a briefing. “It’s absolutely the right thing to do and we want to be the agency that puts the foundational parts in place so that other agencies can follow.

“Clients want it, the industry wants it, influencers are generally happy with it – so why haven’t we done this before?”

By Hannah Bowler,

Sourced from The Drum

By

Imagine waking up one day to find that every click, search, and purchase you’ve made online has been carefully catalogued, not just by corporations but by anyone with the means to access it. It’s not paranoia; it’s reality. In a world where your digital footprint is currency, being untraceable is no longer just a preference, it’s a necessity for those who value their privacy. Whether you’re concerned about data breaches, targeted ads that seem to read your mind, or simply the idea of being constantly monitored, the ability to disappear online is a skill that feels more urgent than ever. But how do you take back control in a system designed to track your every move?

This guide, created by Proton, offers a step-by-step guide to reclaiming your privacy and reducing your online traceability. You’ll learn how to limit corporate surveillance, minimize tracking from smart devices, and even compartmentalize your digital identity to shield yourself from prying eyes. For those seeking the ultimate escape, it explores the possibility of complete anonymity, though not without its sacrifices. Each method is designed to empower you, balancing practicality with the level of privacy you desire. Whether you’re looking to protect sensitive information or vanish entirely, this guide will challenge you to rethink how you navigate the digital world. After all, in an age of constant surveillance, how much of your life do you truly own?

Reduce Your Digital Footprint

Key Takeaways :

  • Use ad blockers, privacy-focused browsers, and extensions like Privacy Badger to limit corporate surveillance and enhance online privacy.
  • Minimize smart device tracking by disabling Wi-Fi and Bluetooth when not in use and consider advanced tools like Pi-hole for network-level protection.
  • Compartmentalize your digital identity by using separate email accounts, phone numbers, and payment methods for different activities, supported by password managers for organization.
  • Protect personal information in public records by using legal entities, decoy addresses, and regular audits to reduce exposure to unwanted scrutiny.
  • Pursue complete anonymity by avoiding traceable devices, using cash or privacy-focused cryptocurrencies, and adopting a non-digital lifestyle if necessary.

1: Limit Corporate Surveillance

Corporations rely heavily on tracking your online behaviour to create detailed profiles for advertising, pricing strategies, and other purposes. To counter this, begin by using ad blockers. These tools prevent intrusive ads and tracking scripts from monitoring your activity across websites. While effective, some websites may restrict access or functionality if they detect an ad blocker in use.

For enhanced protection, switch to privacy-focused browsers like Brave or Firefox, which block third-party cookies and prevent browser fingerprinting. Additionally, consider installing extensions such as Privacy Badger or uBlock Origin to further reduce tracking. These measures may require slight adjustments to your browsing habits, as certain websites might not function optimally. However, the trade-off is a significantly more private online experience, allowing you to browse with greater peace of mind.

2: Minimize Smart Device Tracking

Smart devices, including smartphones, smart speakers, and connected appliances, are designed to collect and transmit data. To reduce this, start by disabling Wi-Fi and Bluetooth when they are not in use. This simple yet effective step prevents your devices from passively sharing information with nearby networks or devices.

For more advanced protection, consider implementing tools like Pi-hole, which blocks unwanted data transmission at the network level. While highly effective, setting up and maintaining such tools can be technically demanding. Additionally, disabling certain tracking features on smart devices may limit their functionality. Evaluate whether these trade-offs align with your privacy priorities, and adjust your approach accordingly.

How to Disappear Online & Become Untraceable

 

Check out more relevant guides from our extensive collection on digital privacy that you might find useful.

3: Compartmentalize Your Digital Identity

Separating your digital identity into distinct compartments can significantly enhance your privacy. This involves using different email accounts, phone numbers, and payment methods for various aspects of your life, such as work, personal activities, and online shopping. By compartmentalizing your digital presence, you reduce the risk of a single data breach exposing all your information.

While this strategy is effective, it requires careful organization and discipline. Managing multiple accounts and credentials can be time-consuming, but the added security is invaluable for those committed to protecting their privacy. Tools like password managers can simplify this process by securely storing and organizing your login information, making sure that your digital compartments remain distinct and manageable.

4: Remove Public Records and Paper Trails

Public records, such as property ownership and voter registration, can reveal sensitive information like your home address. To obscure these details, consider using legal entities, such as trusts or corporations, to hold assets or manage financial accounts. This approach helps shield your personal information from public view.

Another effective strategy is to establish a decoy address for official purposes, such as a P.O. box or a mail forwarding service. This can help mask your actual location while still allowing you to receive important correspondence. Regularly auditing your privacy measures is also essential. Hiring professionals to identify vulnerabilities in your setup can help you address weaknesses before they are exploited. While these steps require time and effort, they provide a robust defence against unwanted scrutiny.

5: Pursue Complete Anonymity

For those seeking the highest level of privacy, adopting a non-digital lifestyle may be necessary. This involves avoiding traceable devices, such as smartphones, modern vehicles, and smart home systems. Instead, rely on analogue tools and non-digital alternatives to minimize your exposure to tracking.

When identification is required, consider using passports instead of driver’s licenses, as they do not disclose your residential address. Additionally, avoid using credit cards or other traceable payment methods, opting instead for cash or cryptocurrencies that prioritize anonymity. Achieving complete anonymity demands significant lifestyle changes and constant vigilance. You may need to forgo many conveniences of modern life, including online services and connected devices. While this level of privacy is not practical for everyone, it remains an option for those with the dedication and resources to pursue it.

Taking Control of Your Digital Presence

Disappearing online and protecting your privacy is a challenging yet attainable goal. By implementing these steps, you can progressively reduce your digital footprint while balancing convenience and security. Whether your aim is to limit corporate surveillance or achieve complete anonymity, the process is deeply personal and depends on your specific needs and comfort level. Each action you take brings you closer to reclaiming control over your digital presence, empowering you to navigate the online world on your terms.

Media Credit: Proton

By

Sourced from Geeky Gadgets