Tag

YouTube

Browsing

By Aminu Abdullahi

YouTube is clarifying monetization rules for repetitive AI-generated videos, synthetic personas, and low-effort content in its Partner Program.

YouTube is tightening the rules around what creators can earn money from, making it harder for channels built on repetitive AI-generated videos, emotionally manipulative content, and AI avatars discussing sensitive topics to qualify for monetization.

The changes, which took effect July 16, do not ban AI-generated videos.

Instead, YouTube says they clarify existing YouTube Partner Program (YPP) policies on what it calls “inauthentic content,” giving creators a more detailed explanation of which videos are no longer eligible to earn advertising or subscription revenue.

Three types of content face monetization limits

According to YouTube, the updated guidance groups inauthentic content into three categories.

The first targets generic, repetitive, or template-based videos, including channels that rely heavily on AI, computer-generated imagery, or reusable templates to produce near-identical content with little originality. Tutorials that simply repackage material already widely available on the platform could also fall into this category.

The second covers “off-putting” or emotionally manipulative content designed primarily to attract clicks and views. YouTube cited videos built around animal distress and rescue scenarios as one example. Channels focused on this type of content can lose access to the YouTube Partner Program regardless of whether AI is involved.

The third category focuses on AI-generated personas used to discuss sensitive subjects such as health care, finance, legal issues, and medical advice. YouTube says it does not want to reward creators who rely on synthetic personalities to present information in these high-stakes areas.

YouTube says AI itself is not the problem

In a Creator Insider video, YouTube Vice President of Trust and Safety Matt Halprin emphasized that the company still sees AI as a valuable creative tool when it is used responsibly.

“AI can actually allow people to make a lot of videos,” Halprin said. “Sometimes those videos are great, and it really enhances creativity. And you can create a higher volume of high-quality content that we want to encourage and have in YPP.”

He said problems arise when creators use the technology to mass-produce nearly identical videos.

“But that exact same new tool can allow you to make lots of videos really quickly that are very similar. They’re very generic and don’t really have a narrative arc and don’t really show your creativity. So the same technology really enables great stuff, but it also enables stuff that’s kind of content farming, and that’s the stuff that we don’t want to have in YPP,” Halprin added.

Explaining the policy on emotionally manipulative videos, Halprin said, “We’ve heard from our viewers that that’s not something that they like. They find it off-putting. They don’t want to come back to that channel, or maybe even the platform.”

What the update means for creators

For creators, the biggest risk isn’t necessarily having videos removed, but losing access to monetization.

Channels that depend on large volumes of low-effort, repetitive uploads could find it harder to earn advertising revenue if YouTube determines that their content lacks originality or meaningful creative input.

Creators using AI for editing, production, scripting, or other creative assistance can still qualify for monetization if their videos provide unique value and meet the platform’s quality standards.

The update also reflects YouTube’s broader effort to protect advertiser confidence as AI-generated content becomes easier and cheaper to produce.

A balancing act for the AI era

The revised guidance highlights a challenge facing nearly every major online platform: encouraging creators to adopt AI without allowing automation to overwhelm users with repetitive or low-value content.

For YouTube, the policy signals that monetization — not just moderation — is becoming a key tool for shaping content quality. Rather than banning AI-generated videos outright, the company is using financial incentives to encourage creators to focus on originality, storytelling, and human contribution.

That approach could influence how other platforms respond as generative AI continues to reshape digital content creation.

Feature image credit: NordWood Themes/Unsplash

By Aminu Abdullahi

Sourced from TechRepublic

By

Meta’s Creator Fast Track programme guarantees three months of pay for established creators willing to build a following on Facebook, after the company paid out a record $3 billion to creators in 2025.

Facebook has a creator problem that three billion monthly users cannot solve. The platform is enormous, but the creators who drive the short-form video economy, the ones building loyal audiences on TikTok and YouTube, have largely looked past it.

Starting on a new platform from zero is daunting, and Facebook’s history with creators has been complicated enough that even those who’ve heard the pitch have reason to hesitate.

On Wednesday, Meta launched Creator Fast Track, a direct attempt to address that hesitation with cash. The programme offers established creators with audiences on other platforms guaranteed monthly payments for three months in exchange for posting Reels on Facebook.

Creators with at least 100,000 followers on Instagram, TikTok, or YouTube can earn $1,000 per month; those who have crossed one million followers on any of those platforms get $3,000 per month.

The eligibility requirements are not onerous. Creators need to post at least 15 Reels on Facebook within a 30-day period, spread across at least 10 different days. The content does not need to be Facebook-exclusive and can include AI-generated material, as long as it is original to the creator.

Participation also unlocks immediate access to Facebook Content Monetization, the broader invite-only programme that pays based on content performance, which means earnings continue even after the three-month guaranteed period ends.

The programme lands alongside a figure Meta is clearly pleased with: in 2025, Facebook paid content creators nearly $3 billion through its monetisation programmes, a 35% increase from the previous year and its highest annual pay-out on record.

That compares with $2 billion in 2024, a figure Rest of World independently confirmed in February. The number of creators earning more than $10,000 annually on Facebook grew by over 30% year-on-year.

The breakdown of where that money went is also notable.

Sixty per cent of the $3 billion went to Reels, while the remaining 40% was split across Stories, photos, and text posts. That last detail matters for the Creator Fast Track pitch: unlike TikTok and YouTube, which are fundamentally video-first platforms, Facebook Content Monetisation pays for almost everything a creator posts.

A writer who shares text posts, a photographer posting stills, or a creator who mainly works in Stories can all earn from the platform without committing to video production.

Facebook Content Monetisation itself has expanded dramatically over the past year. According to Rest of World’s analysis of data from the Meta Monetisation Archive in February 2026, the programme grew from roughly 2.7 million participants to 12 million in just over a year, with Indonesian-language accounts representing the second-largest cohort after English.

The global scale of that expansion is part of what makes the $3 billion figure credible, and part of what Facebook is hoping to leverage to attract creators who might otherwise dismiss the platform as irrelevant to younger audiences.

Meta is also introducing new metrics alongside the programme to help creators understand their earnings more precisely.

These include a Qualified View metric, views on content eligible to earn money, an Earnings Rate showing approximate pay per 1,000 qualified views, and a Non-Qualified Views breakdown explaining why certain views do not generate revenue.

The clearer feedback loop is designed to help creators optimise their content performance rather than simply guessing why their pay-outs vary.

The strategic logic of Creator Fast Track is not subtle. Facebook has been pushing Reels hard since 2020, positioning them as its response to TikTok’s dominance in short-form video.

But Reels require content, and content requires creators willing to invest the time to build on the platform. The guaranteed payment model removes the risk that typically stops established creators from experimenting with a new home: the fear of posting consistently for months and earning almost nothing while an audience is still being built.

For Meta, which reported advertising revenue of roughly $160 billion in 2025, writing cheques to a few thousand established creators is a rounding error against the potential payoff of a more creator-rich Facebook feed.

Whether creators bite depends on something harder to measure than the cash: whether Facebook’s audience and long-term monetisation potential are worth the effort of maintaining yet another profile.

The $1,000-a-month tier, which requires 100,000 followers to qualify, is not a transformative sum for a creator at that scale. The $3,000-a-month tier is more meaningful, though most creators at the million-follower level will be weighing it against what they already earn.

What the programme does offer, unambiguously, is a no-downside trial run, three months of guaranteed income to find out whether Facebook’s reach can surprise them.

By

Sourced from TNW

By Jasmine Sheena

It’s dubbed YouTube Creator Partnerships, and it’s designed to consolidate creator campaign management in one place.

If there were three takeaways from YouTube’s 2026 NewFronts announcements this year, we’d boil it down to this: creators, creators, and creators. Which is not to be confused with last year’s YouTube NewFronts which were also about…creators.

The Rise of the Creator may sound like a new Star War, but it’s clear that “creator” has entered big-business territory, and it’s something marketers want to tap into. According to IAB’s November 2025 report on the creator economy and ad spend, creator ad spend “is projected to reach $37 billion in 2025, up 26% year over year and nearly 4x faster than the media industry’s overall growth. Over the past three years, creator advertising has more than doubled—from $13.9B in 2021 to $29.5B in 2024—as brands increasingly treat creators not just as social media partners but as a full-fledged channel.” YouTube, of course, is a major creator hub, and this year, the platform is rolling out new tools for brands to connect with creators, complete with new features powered by Google Gemini.

Feature image credit: Kaspars Grinvalds/Adobe Stock

By Jasmine Sheena

Jasmine Sheena is a reporter for Marketing Brew writing about adtech, Big Tech, and streaming.

Sourced from Marketing Brew

By Joe Maring

I watch YouTube every single day, but I don’t like sitting through advertisements before and during my videos. Because of this, I pay $14/month for YouTube Premium to remove those ads and get on with my day — as do millions of other YouTube Premium subscribers.

However, some people use a different approach: ad blockers. Using ad blockers to bypass YouTube ads is not a new practice, and each year, YouTube becomes more aggressive in cracking down on such behaviour. With each new measure it introduces, YouTube makes ad-blocking a less and less attractive option.

No one likes ads, and no one likes paying for another subscription. But as someone who finally subscribed to YouTube Premium about a year ago, I’m here to tell you that if you’re still determined to fight Premium with ad blockers, you’re doing it wrong.

Why aren’t you paying for YouTube Premium?

687 votes
I can’t afford it
16%
YouTube used to be free, it should remain free
14%
Ad-blocking and other hacks make Premium worthless
12%
I don’t want to give Google any more of my money
14%
I don’t use YouTube enough to justify it
12%
I do pay for YouTube Premium
32%

The necessary evil of YouTube ads

An advertisement before a music video on YouTube.
An ad playing before a music video on YouTube

No one likes ads. I don’t like ads, you don’t like ads, and I imagine 99.99% of people reading this don’t like ads. The 0.01% of people who say they do are lying.

This is especially true, if not more so, for ads on YouTube. Having to sit through 30 seconds of advertisements before your video starts — and often additional ads throughout the video — is a frustrating user experience. And yet, it’s an experience that’s also completely necessary.

No matter which YouTube creators/channels you watch, the reason they’re able to keep creating new videos is because of that very advertising we all hate. We might despise sitting through ads while watching videos, but without them, we wouldn’t have those creators in the first place. It’s the same story for online advertising for your favourite social media app, recipe website, or tech blog (including Android Authority). Like it or not, ads pay the bills.

Most of us likely know this already, but it’s a good reminder and baseline to establish. Because while ad blockers make your life easier, they don’t just hurt YouTube — they also hurt the creators you watch. While I couldn’t care less if a multi-billion-dollar company loses a few dollars here and there, I do care about ensuring the creators I watch get their fair share of money from me watching their content. But if I watch YouTube with an ad-blocker, they don’t.

YouTube Premium is a fair (and great) solution

Premium logo in the YouTube app.

Although I’ve personally avoided ad blockers for this reason, I have tried other, more ethical solutions to manage YouTube ads over the years. After starting a video, I’d knock out a quick chore or handle something for work until the pre-roll ads finished. If a video had additional ads throughout its runtime, I’d use that time to doom-scroll on my phone, grab a snack, etc.

For a while, this method worked. It wasn’t perfect, but I was still watching all the YouTube videos I wanted without paying a dime — even if it meant my viewing experience wasn’t 100% ideal.

After years of not paying for YouTube Premium, I signed up for a YouTube Premium Lite subscription last April to test the waters. A few months later, I went all-in with a fully-fledged YouTube Premium plan. In the 10 months since, I have not once considered cancelling my Premium subscription. Why? Because the product you get with YouTube Premium is that good.

YouTube app showing the Premium Benefits page.

Naturally, much of this comes down to YouTube Premium’s hallmark feature: ad-free videos. When you open a video, you get it and nothing else — no ads before the video, during, or after. It’s an unquestionably better user experience compared to the ad-supported model, and you have the peace of mind that the channels you watch aren’t being ripped off  — something that will never be possible with an ad blocker.

But it’s not just ad-free videos that have kept me paying month after month. While that’s the main draw (and why I initially started with Premium Lite), everything else you get with YouTube Premium is equally worth the monthly fee.

I don’t use background playback all the time, but every time I do, I’m happy to have it. The Jump Ahead feature makes it so easy to skip through sponsored segments in videos. Continue Watching is great for picking up where you left off on a video you didn’t finish, and video downloads are essential when I’m traveling for work.

$14/month for YouTube Premium is money well-spent.

To get all of this — and an included YouTube Music Premium subscription — for just $14/month is about as good a value as you’ll find in the modern streaming landscape. And if none of those extras matter to you, YouTube Premium Lite for $8/month remains an excellent deal if all you care about is removing ads and nothing else.

Keep in mind, I say all of this as someone who’s actively in the process of cancelling numerous streaming subscriptions. I can’t justify paying $18/month for Netflix or $17/month for Peacock when I use them maybe once a month, but $14/month for YouTube Premium — which dramatically improves my daily YouTube watching — is money well-spent.

This isn’t a difficult choice

youtube app icon google pixel recents

To be clear, I’m not suggesting that everyone needs to subscribe to YouTube Premium. Maybe you’d like to subscribe, but it’s not in your budget. Perhaps you don’t use YouTube enough to justify the monthly fee. Or maybe you truly don’t mind watching ads in between videos. Whatever the case may be, there are plenty of valid reasons not to have YouTube Premium.

However, if the ads annoy you to the point where you’re looking for loophole after loophole to keep watching YouTube with ad blockers, I think it’s time to admit defeat and pay up.

Ad blockers are only getting worse and will continue to hurt creators.

Google may never fully disable ad blockers on YouTube, but the experience of using them is only getting worse and will continue to hurt creators. Meanwhile, YouTube Premium is getting better — whether that’s through new features or more flexible plans like Premium Lite.

We’d be having a very different conversation if YouTube Premium were a bad product, but when it’s (somewhat miraculously) as good as it is, being so resistant to subscribing just doesn’t make sense. I’ve enjoyed my time with Premium since giving in last year, and if you haven’t made the jump already, I really think you will, too.

By Joe Maring

Sourced from Android Authority

By Hillary Remy,Edited by Celine Provini

For decades, Disney, NBC, Paramount and Warner Bros. Discovery sat at the top of the advertising world. In 2025, a 21-year-old video platform built on cat videos and bedroom creators officially knocked them off.

YouTube’s total revenue across ads and subscriptions exceeded $60 billion in 2025, according to Alphabet’s official earnings release, making it larger than Netflix, which reported $45.18 billion for the full year.

A separate analysis by financial research firm MoffettNathanson found that YouTube’s advertising revenue alone surpassed the combined $37.8 billion ad haul from Disney, NBCU, Paramount, and Warner Bros. Discovery. It is the first time YouTube has crossed that threshold.

A year earlier, the tables looked different. In 2024, YouTube’s $36.1 billion in ad revenue fell short of the $41.8 billion those four studios earned collectively.

The reversal in just 12 months is as striking as it is telling about where the advertising industry is heading.

The numbers behind the YouTube advertising milestone

Ad revenue is only part of the story. When subscriptions are included, YouTube’s total 2025 revenue climbed to more than $60 billion, making it larger than Netflix, which reported $45.18 billion for the full year. Only Disney, with $95.7 billion in total revenue, topped YouTube among entertainment companies.

YouTube’s parent company broke out the video platform’s total revenue for the first time in Alphabet’s latest earnings report, a signal of just how central YouTube has become to the broader business.

Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai noted the company now has over 325 million paid subscriptions across consumer services, a figure that includes YouTube Premium, YouTube TV, YouTube Music, and Google One.

YouTube TV alone surpassed 10 million U.S. subscribers as of November 2025, according to Cord Cutters News, making it the third-largest multichannel TV provider in the country, behind only Charter and Comcast.

How Hollywood lost the ad crown to YouTube

YouTube’s advertising dominance didn’t emerge overnight. It has been building for years as audiences, particularly younger ones, quietly migrated away from traditional TV toward on-demand and creator-driven content.

Each of the four major studios reported declining advertising revenue in 2025. WBD’s ad revenue fell 17% in its most recent quarter. NBCU’s domestic advertising declined 6.8% year over year. Disney and Paramount reported similar trends across their linear networks. These declines reflect a structural problem, not a temporary one.

YouTube, meanwhile, is winning the living room. In Q1 2025, YouTube ad spend on connected TV screens surpassed mobile for the first time, accounting for 43% of YouTube ad placements versus 42% on mobile. That is nearly double the CTV share from a year earlier, when it stood at just 24%.

Where YouTube’s growth comes from

YouTube’s blockbuster advertising business derives from several compounding factors that traditional studios simply cannot replicate at the same scale or speed.

Key drivers behind YouTube’s ad surge

  • Shorts momentum: YouTube Shorts now averages 200 billion daily views, up significantly from the 70 billion figure cited earlier in 2025, giving advertisers enormous short-form inventory.
  • Living room dominance: YouTube holds a 12.4% share of total U.S. TV viewing time, ranking first among all media companies, per Nielsen data.
  • Podcast growth: Viewers watched more than 700 million hours of podcasts on YouTube via TV screens in October 2025 alone, up 70% year over year.
  • Creator scale: YouTube has paid out more than $100 billion to creators, music companies, and media partners cumulatively, sustaining a content flywheel no studio can match.
  • Live sports: YouTube’s first exclusive NFL game in September 2025 drew 19 million global viewers across more than 230 countries.

Why advertisers flock to YouTube

The advertiser migration to YouTube is not purely about audience size. It is about measurability.

Brands allocating budgets to YouTube can track outcomes in ways that linear TV has never been able to offer, from view-through attribution to cross-device tracking and real-time performance data.

The YouTube logo appears on a smartphone screen
YouTube allows advertisers to track outcomes in ways that linear television can’t.
Thomas/Getty Images

Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai pointed to AI as a key accelerant of that advertiser shift. AI can deliver “the most relevant ad across surfaces and [match] advertisers against additional queries they weren’t reaching before,” Pichai said on the Q3 2025 earnings call. “AI Max helps advertisers discover new customers at the exact moment they need their product or service.”

That kind of precision targeting is something linear TV simply cannot offer.

It’s a striking endorsement for a platform that still trails Meta, which pulled in $196.2 billion in ad revenue in 2025, by a considerable margin. But in the media and entertainment category specifically, YouTube’s position is now uncontested.

Movie, TV studios are not standing still

Disney, NBCU, Paramount, and Warner Bros. Discovery are all pouring resources into their own streaming platforms, and some are even beginning to distribute content on YouTube itself to chase the audiences that have already moved there.

But the gap is widening, not narrowing. YouTube’s ad revenue grew by nearly $4 billion year over year in 2025, while the combined studio total fell by roughly $3 billion. That is a $7 billion swing in a single year.

For investors watching Alphabet (GOOG), the YouTube story is no longer a footnote in the earnings report. It is increasingly the headline.

By Hillary Remy

Hillary Remy is a finance and technology journalist with over five years of experience covering financial markets, fintech innovation, and emerging technologies that are reshaping the investing landscape. He specializes in stock markets, digital finance, and blockchain‑based financial systems, with a focus on how new technologies are transforming payments, investing, and capital markets. Hillary has contributed analysis and reporting to leading financial publications including Benzinga, Investing.com, and TipRanks, bringing a data‑driven and risk‑aware perspective to complex financial topics.

Edited by Celine Provini

Celine is a writer and editor with over 20 years of experience and has covered diverse news, features, academic/research, and legal topics. At TheStreet.com, Celine is a senior editor with experience across retail, stocks, investing, personal finance, technology, the economy, and travel.

Sourced from The Street

By Lauren Forristal

YouTube has become the biggest platform out there, offering tons of opportunities for creators to earn a living. Back in June, the company reported that its creative ecosystem added over $55 billion to the U.S. GDP and created more than 490,000 full-time jobs.

However, many YouTubers have reduced their reliance on ad revenue and brand deals. There are several reasons for this shift. First, ad revenue can be unpredictable. With YouTube continually updating its policies, some creators find it challenging to secure ads for their videos, which can negatively impact their earnings. They’ve also realized that income from these streams can vanish unexpectedly.

Recognizing the volatility of platform-dependent revenue, many YouTubers are no longer just creators. They’re vertically integrated media companies with parallel businesses, including product lines, brick-and-mortar ventures, and consumer brands that can outlast algorithm changes and policy shifts.

In some cases, these side businesses are growing faster and more sustainably than their YouTube channels.

MrBeast

Image Credits:Beast Industries

Jimmy Donaldson, known as MrBeast, who has 442 million subscribers, isn’t just one of the platform’s biggest creators — he’s its most aggressive entrepreneur.

In November 2025, for example, The Times reported that the YouTuber is set to open a theme park in Saudi Arabia, with rides inspired by his video content. Among other features, there will supposedly be a game where six players stand on trap doors and must press a button when it lights up or fall down.

MrBeast is also venturing into telecommunications. He plans to establish a mobile virtual network operator (MVNO), which could involve partnering with one of the major operators, such as AT&T, T-Mobile, or Verizon.

Additionally, the YouTuber was spotted filing a trademark application for a mobile app that offers banking, financial advisory, and crypto exchange services. In February 2026, MrBeast announced the acquisition of Step, the banking app targeting Gen Z users.

But there’s so much more. What started with a merchandise store in 2018 — ShopMrBeast — has exploded into a broad business portfolio, including his now three-year-old snack brand, Feastables.

Feastables’ initial product was the “MrBeast Bar,” a chocolate bar that generated over $10 million in sales within its first 72 hours, selling over 1 million bars at launch. As of today, Feastables is more profitable than his YouTube content and even his “Beast Games” competition series on Prime Video. In 2024, Feastables generated roughly $250 million in revenue and over $20 million in profit, while his media business lost approximately $80 million.

Other ventures include his packaged food brand Lunchly (co-founded with YouTubers Logan Paul and KSI), the toy line MrBeast Lab, MrBeast Burger, and the analytics platform Viewstats. He even attempted to buy the U.S. operations of TikTok by joining the American Investor Consortium, a group of investors led by Employer.com founder Jesse Tinsley.

Emma Chamberlain

Chamberlain Coffee Emma Chamberlain ready to drink
Image Credits:Chamberlain Coffee

Emma Chamberlain, who rose to fame as a teen vlogger in 2016, now has over 12 million subscribers and has found success in the beverage industry.

She launched her coffee brand, Chamberlain Coffee, in 2019, which offers a variety of products, including cold brew, coffee pods, ground and whole bean options, as well as tea and matcha. Notably, other YouTubers have followed suit, such as Jacksepticeye with his Top of the Mornin’ Coffee brand and Philip DeFranco with Wake & Make Coffee.

In 2023, Chamberlain Coffee had a significant year, introducing ready-to-drink canned lattes and reaching approximately $20 million in revenue, according to Forbes. The brand recently experienced even more substantial growth, opening its first physical location in January. Previously, it had only an online and retail presence at places like Target, Sprouts, and Walmart.

Although Chamberlain Coffee faced some challenges in 2024 due to supplier issues, it’s expected to rebound, with projected revenue growth of over 50% by 2025, reaching more than $33 million, according to Business Insider. The brand is also aiming for profitability by 2026.

Logan Paul

Floyd Mayweather punches Logan Paul during their contracted exhibition boxing match at Hard Rock Stadium
Image Credits:Cliff Hawkins / Getty Images

Logan Paul (23.6 million subscribers) is now known for his wrestling career but was earlier known for numerous controversies, like an infamous 2017 video and an allegedly scammy NFT project, CryptoZoo.

He also gained attention through his energy drink brand, Prime, which achieved rapid viral success in 2022. The brand, co-founded by YouTuber KSI, surpassed $1.2 billion in sales in 2023, a figure far exceeding what most content creators earn from views, ads, and brand deals. However, it has since faced declining sales, regulatory scrutiny for its high caffeine content, and lawsuits from business partners. Sales have particularly cooled in the U.K., where revenue dropped by about 70% from 2023 to 2024.

Another venture of his, Maverick Apparel, made between $30 million and $40 million in 2020.

His brother, Jake Paul, is also involved in various ventures, including co-founding the Anti Fund, which has touted past investments in OpenAI, Anduril, Ramp, and Cognition, among others. The younger Paul also owns a grooming line, called W, and a mobile betting platform called Betr.

Ryan’s World

Ryan’s World, hosted by 13-year-old Ryan Kaji, is another prominent YouTuber with a staggering following. Ryan rose to fame through his toy reviews and unboxing videos, which have captivated nearly 40 million young viewers.

In addition to his YouTube success, Kaji has expanded his brand through a line of toys and apparel that are sold in major retail chains and that reportedly generated over $250 million in revenue in 2020. Kaji and his family have since diversified their ventures, including launching a TV show and an app that provides educational content tailored for children.

Rosanna Pansino

Image Credits:rosannopansino.com

Rosanna Pansino is a popular baker on YouTube known for her baking tutorials and themed treats. With 14.8 million subscribers, she gained fame for her recipes inspired by pop culture, gaming, and movies.

Beyond YouTube, Pansino has released several cookbooks that have been well-received, expanding her Nerdy Nummies brand. She also sells baking tools at several retailers, such as Amazon.

Other YouTubers have ventured into cookware and food products as additional revenue streams. Notable examples include cook and author Andrew Rea, known by the pseudonym Babish, who launched his Babish Cookware brand in 2021, as well as comedy duo Rhett & Link, who sell MishMash Cereal.

Michelle Phan

Ipsy founders Jennifer Goldfarb (left), Marcelo Camberos, and Michelle Phan (right)Image Credits:Ipsy

Michelle Phan gained fame in 2007 with her makeup tutorials, becoming one of the first beauty influencers to effectively monetize her content. In addition to her successful YouTube career, she co-founded the beauty subscription service Ipsy, which has become highly popular. Phan also has her own makeup line, EM Cosmetics.

Huda Kattan

Image Credits:Huda Beauty

Huda Kattan founded the globally recognized beauty brand Huda Beauty in 2013. She sold a minority stake to private equity firm TSG Consumer Partners in 2017 but bought it back in June after investor pressure to bring in senior leadership clashed with her vision for the fast-moving brand, which reportedly brings in hundreds of millions of dollars in sales each year.

Many influencers have created their own makeup brands. Other well-known makeup brands launched by YouTube influencers include Jeffree Star Cosmetics and Tati Beauty.

Feature image credit: Bryce Durbin / TechCrunch

By Lauren Forristal

Lauren covers media, streaming, apps and platforms at TechCrunch. You can contact or verify outreach from Lauren by emailing [email protected]

Sourced from TechCrunch

By

Google updated its Veo 3.1 AI video-generation model with the ability to create native vertical videos for social platforms using reference images. The changes will also make the videos generated from reference images more expressive and dynamic.

When producing AI-generated videos for YouTube Shorts or other platforms like Instagram or TikTok, Veo users can now natively choose the 9:16 vertical format to avoid any cropping. Google is also adding the feature directly to the YouTube Shorts and the YouTube Create app.

Google first released Veo 3.1 in October 2025 with improved audio output and more granular editing controls compared to previous versions.

When you provide reference images, Veo 3.1 now generates videos with better character expressions and movements, even if your prompts are shorter. Google said the update also improves character, object, and background consistency. What’s more, users can blend various characters, backgrounds, objects, and textures to create a cohesive output.

Users can access these features directly in the Gemini app. Professional users can access them through Google’s video editor Flow, the Gemini API, Vertex AI, and Google Vids.

The new update also brings an improved upscaling feature to 1080p and 4K resolutions, which is available on Flow, Gemini API, and Vertex AI in Google Cloud.

Apps, Gemini app, Google,In Brief,Veo,YouTube

Feature image credit: Google

By

Sourced from TechCrunch

By 

It’s an indictment of the current YouTube user experience that ad-free access is now seen as some internet Holy Grail

Fed up with skipping YouTube ads? Good news: we’ve spotted a sneaky way to watch YouTube ad-free – something that, before the avalanche of commercials, used to just be known as using YouTube

There’s no need to cough up a minimum of $7.99/£12.99⁠ per month for a YouTube Premium subscription… and no need to buy a dodgy ad-blocking app that probably won’t work.

How to watch ad-free YouTube without paying (it works)

YouTube serves no ads in Albania due to its smaller market size. And while some Redditors have spotted the occasional ad, we tried it in January 2026 and were served 0 ads after 2.5 viewing hours.

But what if you’re not in Albania? Well, you can use a VPN (virtual private network) and set your location to ‘Albania’.

A word of warning, though, You’ll need a strong VPNs (not a cheap/free one). We tested the likes of NordVPN (try risk-free)Surfshark VPN and Express VPN – all do the trick.

It’s clearly a popular workaround for bypassing ads without paying for YouTube Premium. If you’re ready to go, sign up below and watch YouTube ad-free without paying…

Use a VPN to access YouTube Albania from abroad

NordVPN is our best VPN (we actually have our own in-house expert, Mike, who tests VPNs 24/7 and rates NordVPN No.1 for price, features, security, etc).

We find Nord works best for streaming – allow you to access your usual streaming services when abroad.

You can sign up in minutes and start watching YouTube ad-free…

Quick start: Using a VPN to watch YouTube ad-free

Once you’ve signed up with your chosen VPN:

1. Open the NordVPN app.

2. Connect to a server based in Albania.

3. Fire up YouTube Albania. If that doesn’t work, try it in Google Chrome’s Incognito mode and you should be off to the races.

4. Keep in mind that Google may try to close off this particular loophole one day.

In conclusion

It’s an indictment of the average YouTube user experience in 2026 that ad-free access is now being treated as some internet Holy Grail.

It certainly doesn’t help that skipping one or several ads at the start of a video is no guarantee that you won’t then need to navigate one or more ad breaks and possibly an advertorial too.

Disclaimer

We test and review VPN services in the context of legal recreational uses. For example: 1. Accessing a service from another country (subject to the terms and conditions of that service). 2. Protecting your online security and strengthening your online privacy when abroad. We do not support or condone the illegal or malicious use of VPN services. Consuming pirated content that is paid-for is neither endorsed nor approved by Future Publishing.

Feature Image credit: Sean Gallup via Getty Images

By 

Aatif is a freelance copywriter and journalist based in the UK. He’s written about technology, science and politics for publications including Gizmodo, The Independent, Trusted Reviews and Newsweek, but focuses on streaming at Future, an arrangement that combines two of his greatest passions: sport and penny-pinching.

Sourced from techradar

Taking a break from social media is sounding really, really nice right about now.

  • Earlier this week, YouTube’s Twitter account tweeted an “it’s okay to press pause” message that was pretty much immediately misinterpreted.
  • Rather than taking it as an invitation to unplug and unwind, Twitter users began freaking out, reading it as in support of YouTube pause-screen ads.

YouTube’s Twitter account is one of the more innocuous things you’ll find on that increasingly distasteful platform, and beyond occasionally sharing news of feature additions or the latest content to arrive, it tweets some pretty harmless messages: “it’s a stay-in-and-watch-videos-with-friends kind of night,” “when your watch history is more accurate than your horoscope 😅,” or “thankful for creators who inspire us every day 🧡.” But earlier this week, the account really stepped in it — in a way that the people running it probably never anticipated. 

This all started on Tuesday, when the YouTube account made this seemingly innocent post:

youtube press pause tweet

Now, a sane person might read that tweet in the context of everything else the account has shared, and interpret it as exactly the sort of nothing-message it really is: YouTube’s still going to be here later, so take a break now and then and go enjoy the rest of the world.

But then there are the YouTube ad people. No, we don’t mean Google’s advertising sales team, but that very, very vocal contingent of YouTube viewers who obsess over every change to the service’s use of advertisements (and every effort to stymie ad blockers), while utterly dismissing the suggestion that they should maybe actually just pay for Premium.

If you’ve spent any time at all on Reddit’s YouTube sub, you know exactly who we’re talking about — and of course, they are all over this tweet, too. As you can see from the replies to the original tweet, plenty of Twitter users lost their minds over YouTube’s post, and immediately started associating it with last year’s introduction of pause-screen ads.

That is an impressive stretch to make, but such is the singular focus of these YouTube “enthusiasts.” And they were so incredibly vocal in their hopefully-not-wilful misinterpretation of YouTube’s tweet that they’ve now triggered a Community Note to be featured — ironically, only further steering readers away from YouTube’s actual message.

It’s not just okay to press pause on YouTube videos. Maybe also feel free to press pause on the urge to share every thought you have online — at least, before you at least stop to understand what you’re responding to.

YouTube Premium’s annual plan costs under 40 cents a day, and remains one of the single best values in streaming around. And it continues to not have pause-screen ads.

Stephen has been working in tech journalism since 2008, covering everything from video games to medical devices. His focus is on Android and its ecosystem of connected devices, writing for sites like PhoneArena and Android Police. At Android Authority, Stephen leads the team’s US news coverage.

Sourced from Android Authority

YouTube’s decaying user experience has a more significant role to play in piracy than ad blocking

It’s always the innocent civilian who is the casualty of any war. It would be unfair to say that YouTube’s crusade against third-party apps has quite the gravity of war. However, the fact of the matter is that, once again, it is the customers who are caught in the crossfire of the company’s relentless pursuit to thwart third-party apps. Something’s got to give.

Recently, YouTube stated that it would strengthen its enforcement against apps that help users circumvent ads, circling us right back to YouTube’s other unwinnable war, its war against ad blockers. However, there’s a fallacy in YouTube’s understanding of the issue. Ad-blocking is just one feature offered by third-party YouTube apps and doesn’t necessarily even require another app. These alternative YouTube apps open up a world of quality-of-life additions that YouTube has either decided to remove or wasn’t thoughtful enough to include in the first place. And avid YouTube enthusiasts aren’t about to give up on these incredible features in the face of the company’s threats.

Ad-blocking is just one reason to install a third-party YouTube app

YouTube’s cheapening of the user experience has a larger role to play

Understanding YouTube’s ham-fisted approach against third-party apps requires understanding why people care enough to jump through loopholes to sideload these apps. It would be fairly trivial to point at ads as the singular problem with YouTube. However, that would be trivializing the extent of the issue. Ads have almost always been part and parcel of the YouTube experience. However, there’s a point at which ads become so frequent, so irrelevant, and so relentless that they start hurting the user experience. We’ve been past that point for a while now.

Scour community forums like Reddit, and you’ll spot user complaints about people having to sit through back-to-back ads after watching a single video. The other day, I had to sit through three 30-second long ads, two seemingly unskippable, to watch a minute-long video. That’s ridiculous. YouTube’s sneaky methods of hiding away skip buttons add to the menace.

But that’s not all there is to it. YouTube’s entire user experience has been going downhill for years. Pop open the app, and you’ll be bombarded by utterly unrelated content that has nothing to do with what you’ve been watching. Whatever happened to personalization, YouTube? The issue isn’t recent, either. By all estimates, the tipping point was somewhere around 2016. However, it’s just been getting worse. I don’t see a correlation between stand-up comedy and an account that only follows engineering and history documentaries, but perhaps I’m missing something.

Moreover, those unrelated recommendations have completely taken over my subscriptions. Unless I deep dive into the subscriptions tab, the app won’t show me all the new content that creators I follow have been putting out. There used to be a time when I’d pop into an exciting video and be taken down a rabbit hole of related videos I could binge through the night. That time has gone and has been gone for a while now.

Unfortunately, I wish solid recommendations, or the lack thereof, were the last of my concerns. It’s not, and the mobile app’s degradation has almost put me off watching YouTube on my phone. As I write this piece, my homepage consists of a sponsored ad for a television show in a language I don’t understand. This is followed by a 2 x 4 grid of YouTube Shorts with content unrelated to my subscriptions and watch history. Perhaps there’s a missing connection between Bollywood dance and Czechoslovakia’s Socialist history, but I fail to see it. Stay put because it doesn’t end there. You’ll also find a few more ads and occasionally an entire section dedicated to YouTube Music. Sigh. It really shouldn’t come as a surprise to Google that users are starting to retaliate.

Elsewhere, the app keeps making watching high-quality videos more complicated. My data limit is high enough that I don’t need to micromanage YouTube’s data consumption. If I’ve set it to high-quality playback, I want it to be the case for all the videos I watch. Except, that isn’t the case. Repeatedly, the app swaps out the high-quality stream for a mobile-optimized option.

Third-party apps offer a better YouTube experience than YouTube itself

Sometimes, Less is more

Based on the company’s statements, it’s clear that Google thinks third-party apps exist to remove ads. Sure, that might be the case for a significant number of users. However, these apps also add quality of life additions — A concept that is alien to the company. Dislikes? Who needs them? Right?

Third-party apps let users take control of their feeds. Apps like Revanced let you remove shorts from your home feed, get rid of obtrusive end screen cards, or do things like repeat a particular video — a must-have if you have a go-to focus music track.

Elsewhere, tools like SponsorBlock are a godsend for scrubbing past annoying sponsored segments within a video. This is not content that Google can monetize and should have no issue with. I won’t go into the ethics of supporting a creator you like. My gripes tend to be with creators who agree to partner with unscrupulous companies for a quick buck. But that’s a debate for another day.

YouTube vs. Third-party apps: A cat and mouse game

Third-party apps aren’t going anywhere

YouTube app showing ads

I have little hope that the collective protests of YouTube enthusiasts will change the company’s stance. As video consumption grows multifold year-on-year, Google has a business to run, and ads are its business, not entertainment. It wants you to watch more videos, any videos. Pushing clickbait and conspiracy theories is bound to pique the curiosity of most of us. Similarly, the push to bring podcasts to YouTube is driven by the desire for a consolidated user base to monetize through ads. And it’ll do everything it can to boost engagement over usability. Any additional tap, accidental even, is worth it. It’s pure speculation on my end, but I think it would be fair to say that YouTube’s UX focuses on making the experience annoying enough that users will eventually be compelled to pay for YouTube Premium.

The Android Police team dive into YouTube Premium and whether the benefit of YouTube Music is worth the cost to remove ads

But here’s where YouTube is mistaken — third-party apps aren’t going anywhere. Developers erring on the rebellious side of the internet tend to have a dog-headed approach. The recent example of Nintendo striking down emulators shows that, like the proverbial Hydra, if you chop off one head, another head, or in this case, fork, is bound to pop up. The more Google pushes back, the more developers are bound to double down on their efforts. It might take longer for devs to circumvent some restrictions, but I don’t see any scenario where third-party YouTube apps won’t exist.

YouTube’s monopoly on video streaming guarantees that we haven’t seen the last of this cat-and-mouse game. Google’s “Don’t be evil” days might be behind it, but it would do well to take a step back on pursuing alternative app developers and focus more on improving its core user experience. It only makes it look more evil.

By Dhruv Bhutani

Dhruv Bhutani has been writing about consumer technology since 2008. He brings extensive insights into the Android smartphone landscape, which he translates into features and opinion pieces.

Sourced from Android Police