Tag

AI

Browsing

By

As AI continues to reshape the digital marketing landscape, companies are emerging that harness AI and promise not just incremental improvement but genuine structural change. NDA’s interview series, AI Marketing Pioneers, talks to leaders in this space to discover what they are doing differently.

In the latest installment, New Digital Age sat down with Thomas Ives, Founder of RAAS LAB, and Christian McAlinden, Programmatic Director at dentsu. Their conversation tackled the industry’s deep-seated reliance on legacy metrics, why traditional DSPs fall short on context, and how an innovative programmatic campaign for home improvement giant B&Q delivered 813,000 unique creative variants tailored to real-time consumer intent.

Moving past 2015

For nearly two decades, digital advertising has leaned heavily on easily quantifiable metrics like click-through rates (CTR), reach, CPMs, and viewability. Yet, as both Ives and McAlinden argue, those surface-level indicators belong to an earlier technical era.

“Clicks were a metric for a system which had limitations,” says Thomas Ives, Founder of RAAS LAB. “We should be past it now. We should be thinking more about the quality of the placement, the relevance of the placement, and being a lot more intelligent at that impression level.”

Historically, assessing contextual relevance was treated as a creative judgment rather than a measurable media variable because analysing every impression was humanly impossible.

“If you had a campaign which served nine million impressions, it would take 13 and a half years of one person sat at a desk analysing how well that web page matched each impression,” Ives points out.

Christian McAlinden, Programmatic Director at dentsu, agrees that standard industry habits have held buyers back. “Historically, relevance has been  overlooked. Our industry measured what was easiest to measure, reach, CPMs, viewability, frequency, the basic metrics that we’ve always been able to report on,” McAlinden said. “The result was that campaigns could look efficient on paper, but still miss the nuance of whether the message, context, and consumer mindset were actually aligned.”

Speed vs. genuine innovation

While AI is often treated as a fast forward button for existing tasks, true innovation comes from unlocking completely new capabilities. Rather than relying on static site lists or broad keyword rules, RAAS LAB integrates directly into SSPs, scanning hundreds of thousands of incoming URLs per second to evaluate alignment before the ad is served.

“With AI, it’s the first time that we can possibly measure relevance,” Ives said. “There’s two ways that you can use AI. You can do things quicker, which everyone seems to want to use AI for, or you can do new things with it.

What we’re doing here is using AI to do something that wasn’t possible before.”

For agency leaders, evaluating context within the supply path provides a missing layer that standard buying tools can overlook.

“At the moment in the DSPs, we don’t have a relevancy score,” McAlinden said. “I can build out a site list, I can layer targeting in the open exchange, I know where the ads are going to run, but what are we missing? We’re missing a metric for relevancy.”

B&Q and 813,000 creative variants

The real-world value of AI-driven relevance is best illustrated by a recent campaign executed for retailer B&Q in partnership with dentsu.

Retailers with massive product ranges, B&Q carries over 500,000 products, face a major challenge matching creative messaging to diverse customer needs. A consumer researching shed assembly requires a completely different message than someone browsing blue bedroom paints.

“Every user’s needs are very different,” Ives said. “What we’ve deployed for B&Q across multiple campaigns essentially took in 813,000 unique creative variants that were deployed as part of that campaign. It really solves that problem which advertising’s always had: How do you bring together the creative and the targeting thinking?”

The results demonstrated the impact of context over simple reach. The campaign achieved click-through rates 4x higher than standard display benchmarks, maintained a content relevance score over 70%, and drove a statistically significant lift in brand consideration around ‘ease of shopping.’

Previous iterations of this relevance-first approach even generated higher physical store footfall than paid social efforts, said Ives.

The path to adoption

Despite clear performance gains, shifting an entire industry away from legacy habits takes time. Agencies play a critical role in bridging the gap and educating brand marketers who may be hesitant to stray from familiar metrics.

“It’s like everything in advertising, it’s reluctancy. You stick to what you know,” McAlinden said. “The education piece needs to come from the agencies. We need to be taking charge here, encouraging new strategies to move forward.”

With shortening attention spans in a fragmented media environment, Ives believes brands need a new approach to consumer communication.

“To get these attention-poor people to connect with you again is through being relevant,” Ives said. “It’s not just the message itself, it’s a message that matches the moment that the user is currently in.”

By

Sourced from NewDigitalAge

By Laure Malergue

In this article, Laure Malergue of Displayce, explains how agentic AI can bring DOOH into planning earlier, make recommendations easier to defend and connect data, activation and learnings. She explores what makes a strong DOOH agent, why specialist data and workflows matter and how this approach could help the media secure a more influential role in media strategies from the very first planning conversation.

Walk along the Croisette during Cannes Lions, and advertising is everywhere in its most physical form: posters, digital screens, branded spaces and large outdoor moments. This year, another presence was just as visible: AI agents.

For the past two years, most of the AI conversation in advertising has focused on production. This year’s adtech announcements mark a shift from AI-assisted tools towards agentic systems able to make, coordinate and execute advertising decisions.

That shift raises a more important question for the industry: Will AI agents make media decisions better?

Media planning has always been a discipline of choices: Which audience matters most? Which context will make the message stronger? Which channel should enter the plan earlier? Which budget split is easiest to defend? These choices shape the campaign long before it goes live.

For digital out-of-home (DOOH), this could be a turning point.

DOOH is invited too late to the party

DOOH has many of the qualities brands are looking for today: real-world and brand safe visibility, public attention, contextual relevance with the ability to adapt to location, weather, time of day, audience flows and live events. Yet, it still lacks discoverability within the media mix.

Too often, it enters the media plan late, once the brief, strategy and main budget choices have already been shaped. DOOH is then considered at the execution stage, although its strongest value could have influenced the plan earlier.

The challenge is practical. DOOH requires strong knowledge of audience data, mobility patterns, local specificities, screen environments, formats, availability, pricing, context, timing and measurement. The value is clear, but turning these parameters into a confident recommendation takes time.

Programmatic DOOH has solved a large part of the activation challenge by automating the buying process. The next challenge sits earlier, when a media planner decides whether DOOH deserves a place at the table, how much budget it should receive and why one scenario is stronger than another.

Making DOOH easier to recommend

This is where agentic AI can change the role of DOOH in the media mix. The strongest agents will be judged by the quality of the decisions they support: can they explain why one scenario is stronger than another, help a planner defend DOOH in a wider media strategy and turn campaign results into learnings for the next brief?

This is the concept Displayce is bringing to the market with Agentic DOOH: a way to connect the brief, recommendation, activation and learning loop, so DOOH can influence media thinking before the plan is locked.

This conviction comes from more than a decade building programmatic DOOH technology. Our goal is now to make DOOH easier to recommend, with specialist intelligence available inside the environments where agencies and brands are already building media plans.

This is why Displayce’s agents are available via Model Context Protocol (MCP). The MCP allows AI applications such as ChatGPT or Claude to connect with external data sources and tools. For agencies building their own agentic workspaces, this means DOOH intelligence can be accessed where planners already work. For Displayce, MCP is a way to bring specialist DOOH expertise into the existing media ecosystem, with more openness and interoperability.

What makes a good agent for DOOH?

A generic AI model can understand language, but it does not understand media by itself. For DOOH, a good agent needs to be built on a strong data ecosystem, expert workflows and simulation algorithms. This is the foundation behind Displayce’s agents.

The data ecosystem gives the agent access to the signals that matter: audience data, mobility patterns, inventory context, screen environments, local context and historical campaign performance.

The expert workflow helps the agent understand how DOOH planning actually works: the objective, the constraints, context, timing and budget, and the level of explanation a planner needs to defend a recommendation.

The simulation algorithm allows the agent to compare scenarios, test assumptions and understand why a city, venue type, screen, audience group, daypart or context is relevant.

Without these foundations, an agent can create a recommendation that looks convincing but has limited media value. With them, it can support stronger, clearer and more transparent DOOH decisions.

Make DOOH impossible to ignore from the very first media conversation

By bringing DOOH expertise into planning workflows earlier, Agentic DOOH can change how the medium is considered by agencies, brands and media owners.

For agencies, this means less time assembling data and more time shaping the argument. For brands, it means clearer recommendations and greater confidence in DOOH investment. For media owners, it means making local knowledge and premium inventory visible while the plan is still being shaped.

Human judgment remains central. Planners still decide what is right for the brand, the role of agents is to give teams better scenarios, stronger explanations and more time to think.

Agentic DOOH should be measured by one question: Does it help the medium earn a stronger place in the media plan? If the answer is yes, AI agents will help bring DOOH further upstream in the media decision-making process, at the moment when budgets are shaped, strategies are built, and channel choices are made.

 

By Laure Malergue

Sourced from The Drum

BY ASHLEY COUTO

New data shows AI assistants cite independent YouTube creators more than brand-owned content. Founders who adjust their creator briefs now will get pulled into the answers that drive buying decisions.

YouTube creator content now appears in more than 25 percent of prompts answered by AI assistants, according to new research from Jellyfish shared exclusively with Adweek. In high-intent categories like consumer electronics and financial services, nearly one in two references come from Youtube.

The Jellyfish team analyzed 27 million responses across seven AI search assistants and found that independent, niche creators consistently outrank brand-owned content and celebrity influencers in AI-generated answers.

For founders, that means the customer journey is being rerouted through creators they may have never considered partnering with. While Reddit used to be the belle of the AI search ball, YouTube has overtaken it. Here are five things founders can change about their creator strategy to get pulled into AI search results.

Look beyond celebrity influencers

Jellyfish analyzed responses across Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, DeepSeek, Meta AI and Perplexity. Smaller creators consistently came out on top, especially those with high niche authority as opposed to more generalized creators.

An OtterlyAI study of more than 100 million citations found that roughly 41 percent of cited YouTube videos had fewer than 1,000 views and 36 percent had fewer than 15 likes. The median cited channel had posted fewer than 41 total videos.

That means a micro-creator with 2,000 subscribers and a well-structured tutorial can earn more AI citations than a high-profile partnership. AI systems prioritize reference value over popularity metrics, according to OtterlyAI’s analysis.

Prioritize long-form video over short-form

Jellyfish’s data favored videos longer than 10 minutes. OtterlyAI found AI platforms barely cited YouTube Shorts at all outside Google’s own surfaces, with 94 percent of cited YouTube videos qualifying as long-form.

That contradicts the standard creator brief at most startups, which still asks for 30-second cuts optimized for TikTok and Reels. To surface your brand in AI search assistants, fund a structured 12-minute walkthrough rather than a punchy clip.

Insist on chapters and timestamps

Only 31 percent of cited YouTube videos have chapter structure, according to OtterlyAI’s research. That gap represents an opportunity competitors haven’t closed.

Chapters turn one video into multiple citable units. When a creator adds timestamps for “unboxing,” “setup,” “first impressions” and “comparison,” each section becomes its own potential AI citation.

Make this a line item in your creator brief. Pay for the editing time required to get the structure right.

Prioritize topical authority over follower count

A detailed YouTube review from a recognized creator now carries more citation weight than a Reddit thread with mixed opinions, according to a Superlines analysis. AI systems read subscriber counts, channel history and stated credentials as authority signals.

The right questions to ask when vetting creators are whether they consistently cover the category and whether their channel has a clear topical focus. A creator who posts consistently about makeup for olive skintones is a better bet than a generalist with five times the audience for AI search.

Track AI citations as an influencer success metric

AI search traffic converts at 14.2 percent, compared with 2.8 percent for traditional Google search, according to data cited in PikaSEO’s analysis. That conversion gap is too significant to leave unmeasured.

Adding creator-sourced AI citations as a tracked metric, alongside backlinks and branded search volume, gives founders a clearer picture of which partnerships are working. Most creators aren’t well versed in the intricacies of SEO, let alone answer engine optimization (AEO) and generative engine optimization (GEO), so you’ll likely need to coach on keywords and structure to maximize generative search capabilities.

AI assistants are sending searchers to video creators, and the brands those creators reference will end up with the sale. Founders who adjust their creator strategy now will get cited while their category competitors catch up.

Feature image credit: Illustration: Getty Images

BY ASHLEY COUTO

Sourced from Inc.

BY JOEL COMM

Paid social is a leading digital marketing option for brand awareness and product discovery. Here’s how AI is taking it to the next level.

Digital marketing used to be innovative, but now it’s the norm. Statista estimates that 82.4 percent of total ad spending will be digital by 2030. Success is no longer about simply showing up online; it’s about the specific strategy you’re using.

Tossing artificial intelligence into the mix makes the answer even more relevant. I looked at two major segments of digital advertising: paid social and paid search. I wanted to see how AI was reshaping the digital advertising conversation around these two critical points.

The results were notable. Let’s dig in.

The shift toward paid social in an AI-driven landscape

Google used to dominate search. Sure, some people shopped on Facebook, but in reality, most people turned to Google or even Amazon when they needed to buy something.

That balance appears to be shifting. One recent report found more than 50 percent of social media users are on the lookout for new things to buy. Specifically:

  • 26.7 percent of social media users are looking for either new activities or items to purchase.
  • 26.1 percent of those on social media are actively looking for products to buy.

Add those two numbers together, and more than one in two people are using social media to discover things they may want to buy. Other marketers, like Sixty Gelu, already put the number at 60 percent, which is especially notable now that Google search traffic is facing growing pressure. Yes, AI tools are coming in their wake, but these haven’t been as widely adopted for e-commerce yet.

AI-powered tools like ChatGPT and Claude are changing how consumers research products and gather information. But in the end, social platforms remain one of, if not the, primary drivers of product discovery and brand engagement.

That is the first trend marketers should pay attention to: the landscape has changed. Paid search may not be your only priority anymore. You need to make sure you have a foot in the paid social world, too. Start by auditing your budget and moving a small percentage of your search spend into targeted social testing to meet these buyers where they are.

Navigating customer journeys on social media

Paid social ads are the first step, but they aren’t the whole story. An initial branded encounter on a social media platform is just the beginning of the customer journey. In fact, the best uses of AI go far beyond the top of the funnel.

This shift is forcing an evolution in performance metrics.

To counter this, many performance marketing teams are using AI-assisted workflows to maximize lead quality in real time. For example, agencies like Unicorn Marketers use AI to evaluate incoming leads and filter out low-intent prospects before they drain sales teams’ time and resources.

By using advanced algorithms to continuously audit live campaigns, you can help ensure your creative assets and targeting parameters consistently perform well for high-intent buyers. It can review real-time, granular data at a scale that would be difficult for a human to match. AI is also helping marketers understand why certain ads outperform others. Platforms like Motion analyse creative performance across thousands of ads, helping marketing teams identify the images, messaging and formats that consistently drive stronger engagement and conversions.

Building an AI-backed social strategy in 2026 requires moving past the trap of chasing the latest shiny tool. To avoid the common mistake of over-automation, you should focus on strategy, clean data and intentional integrations by implementing a few tactical steps:

  1. Defining the use of an AI tool in your paid social strategy before investing in it.
  2. Avoiding the “magic bullet” approach to AI by looking for quality data to drive decisions.
  3. Piloting one new AI tool at a time, letting it settle and then adjusting based on the results you get.
  4. Maintain the “human” element behind your AI tools that help preserve nuance and brand voice. (i.e., don’t over-automate!)

Effectively (and profitably) reshaping paid social with AI

Social media is a well-established option that millions use when they want to find something to buy. This has helped position paid social as a major force in digital ad spend and the future of digital marketing.

As AI handles the operational and executional work around paid social, it’s critical to step back from the dashboard and evaluate your broader positioning. Make sure you’re integrating AI with intention while keeping the role of human creativity, strategic thinking and brand positioning in focus. This ensures your automated tools are serving a distinct business objective rather than just generating noise.

Feature image credit: Adobe Stock

BY JOEL COMM

AUTHOR AND SPEAKER @JOELCOMM

Sourced from Inc.

By Hunter Schwarz

These ads might be fake, but they skewer a real problem: AI ‘slop voice’ that made nonsense the new normal.

There’s a specific voice and vagueness to technology advertising today.

The ads are often for startups you’ve never heard of selling a service or software that’s somehow related to AI. And while the ad voice is direct, in that it’s written as if it’s speaking directly to you, the viewer, the copy is intentionally cryptic. “Own Your Inference.” “Put AI Agents to Work for People.” Sometimes it’s menacing. “Stop Hiring Humans.”

These kinds of ads seem to be everywhere lately, but that doesn’t mean that they make much sense. Now, comedians Harris Alterman and Dave Ross are emphasizing just how banal and meaningless the AI ad age is turning out to be by creating their own fake tech ads that skewer the medium simply by amping up its tropes: AI industry gobbledegook and design minimalism.

[Photo: courtesy Harris Alterman and Dave Ross]

The ads, which they put up as banners in a New York City subway station (much like the controversial, real ads for the AI companion Friend last fall) ask asinine questions. “What if forks were spoons?,” “What if Texas was upside-down?,” and “What if the Rizzler was purple?” One fake ad is for a company with a human name, “Dennis.”

[Photo: courtesy Harris Alterman and Dave Ross]

Another advertises a faux company that recently rebranded. “Zipline is now Froggle,” the ad says matter-of-factly. “The cloud-based online safety you know and love, now in the palm of your hand.” An ad for a brand called Fivetable confidently states “We Put the Q in QR1777,” and Wireflow promises “you pay us, we pay you.”

[Photo: courtesy Harris Alterman and Dave Ross]

Alterman and Ross were especially inspired by a real ad for the product development software company Linear, which shows cursors pointing toward God’s outstretched hand, as in Michelangelo’s “The Creation of Adam,” and another for Dawn, an AI mental-health app, that says “Racing Thoughts Don’t Do Waiting Rooms.”

[Photo: courtesy Harris Alterman and Dave Ross]

They call the lack of distinctiveness around AI advertising in its design, voice, and fonts “slop voice,” and note that while these ads sound like they’re speaking to you, they’re really talking to someone else: a high tech, SaaS-speaking in-groupAnd it’s ok if the copy alienates everyone else.

[Photo: courtesy Harris Alterman and Dave Ross]

“People are confused by tech advertising,” they tell Fast Company in an email. “99% of the people reading these ads have no idea what they’re talking about. It feels like 20 people in tech, advertising to 20 other people in tech. Do you really need to put up ads? Can’t you guys just get in a group chat together?”

[Photo: courtesy Harris Alterman and Dave Ross]

That’s how Alterman and Ross made their ads, after all. The comedians wrote them together. Ross then designed the ads in Photoshop and made websites for them using HTML/CSS and Javascript. While their fake ads aren’t for real tech companies, they are selling something. The comedians put up a merch shop under their brand called Goofstump.

Alterman says they plan to make more fake ads, and they’d like to partner with the MTA to make an official art installation. Though they’ve set up websites for some of the parody brands, he says they didn’t pay for all the URLs they’re advertising. The URL for sellyourposessions, for example—”Are You Poor? Sell Your Possessions,” is the tagline—costs about $700, or “a little too much for a joke,” he says. Especially in times like these.

Feature image credit: courtesy Harris Alderman and Dave Ross

By Hunter Schwarz

Hunter Schwarz is a Fast Company contributor who covers the intersection of design and advertising, branding, business, civics, fashion, fonts, packaging, politics, sports, and technology.. Hunter is the author of Yello, a newsletter about political persuasion More

Sourced from FastCompany

By 

AI speeds up advertising, but without strategy it risks making brands forgettable

For small businesses, AI has made advertising easier to produce but much harder to differentiate.

What should have been a useful shortcut is quickly becoming a creative trap. As more brands rely on the same tools to write copy, shape campaigns and generate ideas, too much of the output is starting to feel interchangeable.

The ads may look polished enough to publish, but polish is not the same as impact, and efficiency is not the same as originality.

That matters because most ads are not competing in a vacuum. They are fighting for attention in crowded feeds, against endless lookalike content, in front of audiences who have become highly skilled at filtering out anything that feels generic.

When brands use AI without a clear point of view, they do not just risk making weaker creative. They risk making work that disappears on contact.

The problem is not AI, it’s the way many businesses are using it.

Patterns & performance

Most generative AI tools are built on patterns. They are good at producing what is probable, what is familiar and what already resembles successful marketing. That can help with speed, but it also creates sameness.

Similar phrasing, similar structure, similar claims, similar tone. After a while, entire categories begin to sound like they were written by the same person for the same audience, regardless of who is actually selling the product.

For brands trying to grow, that is a serious commercial issue.

When advertising starts to blend in, performance usually follows. Ads that feel vague or formulaic tend to attract less curiosity, fewer clicks and weaker engagement. Businesses then spend more trying to force results from creative that never had enough edge in the first place.

The waste is not always obvious at first, which is partly why the problem is spreading. A campaign can still be technically competent while quietly underperforming where it counts.

Over time, that gap compounds. Budgets get allocated based on surface-level performance rather than true effectiveness, and teams double down on what feels safe instead of what actually works.

The result is more output, more spend, and very little movement in terms of brand recognition or recall.

For SMEs, the stakes are even higher.

Solving the wrong problems

Big brands can sometimes get away with forgettable advertising because they already have reach, recognition and budget on their side. Smaller businesses do not. They depend far more heavily on clarity, distinctiveness and trust.

Their marketing has to do more with less, which means the brand itself needs to be sharper, not flatter. If AI strips out the character, specificity or conviction that made a business memorable in the first place, it starts eroding one of the few real advantages that smaller brands have.

That is the irony in all this. Many businesses are using AI to save time and strengthen output, only to end up producing ads that weaken the very thing they are trying to build.

Solving the wrong problem

The issue usually starts long before anything goes live. Too many marketers are asking AI to solve the wrong problem. They are using it to generate finished ads before they have properly defined what the brand wants to say, who it needs to resonate with, or why anyone should care. When the strategic thinking is thin, AI does not improve it. It simply accelerates it.

That is why so much AI-assisted advertising feels hollow. It fills space nicely, but it rarely lands with force. It often says the sort of thing a brand should say, in the sort of tone a marketer expects, without ever arriving at something sharp enough to be remembered.

There is also a growing risk around brand dilution. When multiple teams, agencies or founders rely on similar prompts and tools, the outputs begin to converge. Without strong internal direction, even well-intentioned campaigns can start to blur together, weakening long-term brand equity in ways that are difficult to reverse.

Taking a clearer position

The brands getting this right are taking a more disciplined approach. They are not handing the whole process over to a tool and hoping for the best. They are using AI to support execution while keeping the core thinking firmly human. That means using it to test routes, speed up production and explore variations, but not to define the message.

They are also investing more time upfront. Clear positioning, sharper audience insight and stronger creative direction are doing the heavy lifting, with AI acting as an amplifier rather than a substitute. That shift alone is often the difference between content that performs and content that fades.

Good advertising has always depended on knowing what makes a business distinct and then expressing it clearly. That has not changed. If anything, it matters more now. In a market flooded with passable content, originality has become more valuable, not less.

AI can help marketers move faster, but speed only matters if you are moving in the right direction.

We’ve listed the best email marketing platforms.

Feature image credit: Getty Images

By 

SEO & Digital PR search specialist at Cupid PR.

Sourced from techradar.pro

By Krystal Scanlon

OpenAI is poised to automate one of advertisers’ most laborious tasks: ad creative.

Over the past four months of its ad pilot, OpenAI has required advertisers to upload the creative they want to submit, while the platform supports ad delivery. But now, OpenAI is going one step further in the process, by helping advertisers automate the mass production of creative, according to an updated section of its Ad Tools Term Document.

“OpenAI may make available AI-powered Creative Tools that allow you to generate, modify, transform, optimize, localize, or translate advertising creatives using Ad Materials,” the updated policy said.

That’s where OpenAI’s intention would stop. It has no intention of taking accountability for what the system produces. The policy states that the advertiser is “responsible” for reviewing the creatives and ensuring they are accurate and compliant where necessary.

“OpenAI is not responsible for errors, omissions, outdated information, or inconsistencies in Ad Materials or for Claims or losses arising from Generated Creatives that you approve or use,” the policy stated.

The move is hardly surprising, according to eMarketer’s principal analyst, AI in marketing and commerce, Nate Elliott. As he put it, it makes sense for OpenAI to throw AI at their ad operation.

“They know as well as anyone the power of AI for enterprise workflows; it’d be shocking if they didn’t tap that capacity for something they hope will become a major source of revenue,” he said. “And if they’re trying to make billions selling this type of capability to other companies, then they’d better very well eat their own dog food.”

It would also make it more competitive. Every major platform has spent years automating more of the buying process, which has made creative the last real variable. The logic being that once algorithmic optimization took over media buying, the bottleneck shifted upstream to creative. Platforms had a structural incentive to close that gap. More variants mean more auction signals, more liquidity, and ultimately more revenue.

“Marketers are moving faster than ever, and having proven creative assets ready to deploy lowers the barrier to experimenting with new advertising channels like ChatGPT,” said Brian Quinn, president and general manager of AppsFlyer. “But the real test will be campaign performance. If OpenAI can help brands launch seamlessly, demonstrate measurable results, and shorten the path from testing to scale, advertisers won’t just come back. They’ll commit larger budgets and make ChatGPT a meaningful part of their media mix.”

The creative tools aren’t the only update to OpenAI’s growing ad suite.

The AI platform has added conversion tracking for app installs and app opens, according to screenshots verified by Digiday. Ads for apps is a major category in online marketing, so laying the groundwork to track measurable actions such as installs, opens and purchases, would not only attract app marketers, but also provide OpenAI with another justification for more ad spend. And given how fast things are moving, the company clearly expects more ad dollars to start trickling in, having updated the daily ad budget from $100 to $200.

These latest updates show that OpenAI is moving beyond just selling inventory, toward building the complete infrastructure advertisers expect from mature platforms. Having the ability to produce creative at scale helps to solve the problem of having enough creative to feed the AI systems, while advancing conversion tracking helps to prove that those ads drive outcomes. And ultimately, these additions represent another step toward OpenAI turning its four-month old ad pilot into a fully-fledged ad business.

Feature image credit: Ivy Liu

By Krystal Scanlon

Sourced from DIGIDAY

By DAVE KERPEN

Sometime this spring, AI stopped being a passive tool you pick up and started becoming an active system that runs in the background.

For about two years, most of the AI I saw at conferences and in companies I work with fell into a category I’d call “cool demo, now what?” (I’ve written before about the non-obvious ways tools like GPT change the game.) Someone shows you a dazzling thing the technology can do, everyone applauds, and then Monday arrives and nothing about how the work actually gets done has changed.

That era is ending, and I don’t think enough people have noticed.

Sometime this spring, AI quietly crossed a line. It stopped being a passive tool you pick up and started becoming an active system that runs in the background. Recent reports describe autonomous agents that can manage and execute multi-step tasks without a human babysitting each step. One phrase from the research stuck with me: AI is moving “from demo culture into the operating system” of small companies. Not the flashy part. The plumbing.

That shift changes the question I think every leader should be asking. For two years, the question was, “What can this tool do?” The better question—the one that actually predicts whether you’ll get value—is: “What have we built around it?”

Run the co-worker test.

For each AI tool in your company, ask: is this something a person occasionally picks up, or a system that runs whether or not anyone’s watching? If everything is still in the “occasionally picks up” category, you’re stuck in demo culture and leaving the real value on the table.

Build the guardrails before you build the autonomy.

The big enterprise vendors are racing to turn safety, permissions, and audit trails into product features—because an unsupervised agent with the wrong permissions is a disaster waiting to happen. Before you let an agent act on its own, decide exactly what it can touch, what it must escalate, and how you’ll review what it did. Write it down on a single page. It may be the most valuable document you create all year.

Pick the handoff, not the takeover.

The mistake is trying to automate an entire job. The win is automating the handoff—the agent does the first 80 percent, then hands a human the 20 percent that needs judgment, taste, or care. The goal isn’t to replace your people; it’s to hand them the hard, human work with the easy stuff already cleared away. That’s not a smaller job. It’s a better one.

The goal was never to remove the humans. It was to remove the parts of work that were beneath the humans. We spent a century asking people to do robotic work because we didn’t have robots. Now we do. The opportunity isn’t to do the same work faster—it’s to finally let people do the work only people can do: the caring, the creating, the connecting—and let the quiet co-workers handle the rest.

The demo era is over. The operating-system era has begun. The only question that matters now isn’t how smart your tools are. It’s what you’ve had the discipline to build around them. Ask yourself the co-worker test today. The companies that answer it honestly—and then build the boring infrastructure—are going to look unrecognizable, in the best way, a year from now.

Feature image credit: Getty Images

By DAVE KERPEN

CEO, KERPEN VENTURES @DAVEKERPEN

Sourced from Inc.

By

As AI takes over from Google search, the thing that used to draw people to your creative work is disappearing fast. Here’s what’s happening, and how to respond.

At Cannes Lions 2026, Pinterest said something that should stop every creative in their tracks. Alongside a suite of shiny new AI advertising tools, the platform offered a candid description of where the whole industry is heading.

The web, it said, is moving “beyond the traditional search-and-click model toward a more conversational and generative web,” where brands now compete “not just for attention, but for recommendation, relevance and action”. That might sound like a boringly technical sentence, but buried within it is something very profound that affects every creative working today.

Because what it describes isn’t just a change in how Pinterest sells ads, but a fundamental change in how people find information and inspiration online. And if you’re a creative, the implications for whether you actually get work in future are huge.

Discovery is being dismantled

Until recently, the web gifted creatives many ways to attract clients that didn’t demand a huge marketing budget. A portfolio site that ranked in search results for “editorial illustrator” or “branding studio Bristol.” Instagram, Behance or Dribbble surfacing work to people who’d never heard of you. A piece is getting shared, and the share carries your name back to your profile. None of this required paid promotion.

Now, though, every rung of that ladder has been sawn off.

We’ve seen the decline of organic search: on Google, your freelance or studio site now sits below ads, AI Overviews and big-domain content, making it close to hopeless in promoting your craft. Meanwhile, social algorithms have decoupled reach from quality. Feeds now reward volume, trends and posting cadence rather than the best work, and throttle creators unless they either pay or perform constantly.

And now, as the final nail in the coffin, agentic AI (where AI basically acts as your personal assistant) has removed the last thing the first two still left intact: the click that carried a person to your door.

Who wins and who loses?

Nowadays, when someone types “find me an illustrator who works in cut-paper collage for a children’s book”, AI returns an answer, not a list of links to explore. It decides who gets named, and there’s no way to influence it: no ad slot to buy, no SEO lever to pull.

And how does it reach this decision? AI platforms lean on aggregate signals: who’s already cited, listed, written about, and linked to. This favours the already-famous and the big studios with a deep web footprint, leaving the vast majority of smaller independents floundering.

It’s a virtuous circle for the former, a vicious one for the latter. The visible gets recommended, and the recommendation makes them more visible. The talented new graduate with a thin online presence isn’t in AI’s field of view, so they stay invisible forever.

Pinterest’s new Ask Pinterest app captures this dynamic perfectly. It’s designed, the company says, for “more conversational, complex, multi-step decisions that don’t fit neatly into a single search”: planning a dinner party, furnishing a room over time, finding a gift that feels personal. Truly, it sounds like a great experience. But there’s a trade-off, and it’s a biggie. When answers arrive without a source, the source no longer matters.

So what should you focus on instead?

Pinterest is changing
Pinterest is changing

Be a category of one

In this shiny new world of AI, you can’t optimise your way into a recommendation, the way you once keyword-optimised a website. Recommendation runs on reputation signals that a system can read: being named in other people’s work, on lists, in interviews, in the press, and in collaborations. So the answer for creatives isn’t to play the algorithms harder. It’s to become the name people and systems already trust enough to surface.

One part of that is to own your relationships. A newsletter list, for example, is a direct connection that no algorithm can intermediate away. A community of people who’ve chosen to hear from you isn’t subject to a platform’s recommendation logic. Look at how designers like Liz Mosley have built something genuinely resilient: a website, a podcast, templates, resources; an audience that actively follows her work rather than stumbling across it.

Another is to get cited and named, because getting talked about (positively, of course) is the new currency. This means leaning on the channels no algorithm can gatekeep: word of mouth, referrals, events, and real rooms. And in your work, aiming to be a category of one, with a style so specific it gets requested by name rather than retrieved by attribute. The creatives who get asked for by name are the ones that AI can neither replace nor substitute.

Lee Brown, Pinterest’s chief business officer, frames it this way: “The future of discovery won’t be driven by keywords alone. It will be shaped by context, taste, and trusted recommendations.” He’s describing his platform’s perceived advantage. But he’s also, accidentally, describing yours.

Context is where you work. Taste is what you’ve spent years developing. And trusted recommendations? Those come from people who know you and what you make, not from a system optimising for engagement.

Uncertain future

One last thought. If the systems doing the recommending keep starving the independents who make the original work, they’ll eventually run short of anything worth recommending. AI will ultimately kill off its own supply of information and inspiration. Where that death-spiral leads us is anyone’s guess, but it’s best to be prepared all the same.

In the meantime, I’d advise you to start building those direct relationships. Make the work that can’t be AI-assembled from anything else. And above all, don’t wait for your web traffic to disappear before you start, because that could be too late.

By

Sourced from Creative Boom

By Jennifer Mattson

AI disrupted the current job market—and created a long list of new roles with impressive salaries across tech, medicine, HR, IT, marketing, and more.

Artificial intelligence is disrupting the current job market, leaving a trail of corporate layoffs and workers scrambling to determine what positions will be safe in the future.

At the same time, AI tools are also creating a number of high-paying jobs that didn’t exist a decade ago, according to a new report from job search and career platform Ladders. The survey looked at data from professionals earning over $100,000 a year and mapped the top 15 six-figure jobs that it says are worth considering.

“Most headlines frame AI as a wrecking ball aimed at our paychecks,” Marc Cenedella, Ladders’ CEO, tells Fast Company. “This study, however, shows [more than] 1.3 million new jobs have been created since the term ‘AI’ entered the mainstream vernacular, with many of those roles paying 56% above the rest of the pack.”

These jobs exist across industries including medicine, marketing, technology, human resources, information technology (IT), and cybersecurity.

Cenedella says the study’s real value is that it provides a map of the jobs that workers should invest their time in today, including a mix of new positions (chief listening officer, AI ethicist, and climate change analyst) as well as some obvious choices (SEO specialist, social media manager, and chief AI officer).

“The best job bets all share one trait: A human is managing the machine, not racing against it,” Cenedella adds.

AEO specialists and AI ethicists?

Cenedella says there is currently a high demand for AEO specialists and AI ethicists. But what exactly do they do?

As AI-generated summaries cut search in Google by 45% (even though the summaries are wrong 10% of the time), companies are adapting to the collapse in web traffic by investing in answer engine optimization (AEO) specialists, who make sure their original content appears in AI overviews or large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT and Claude. These AEO specialists are the next generation of marketing and website professionals.

Alternatively, the need for AI ethicists will only continue to grow as AI agents make more autonomous decisions, requiring a human to verify that their output is accurate, legal, and fair. AI ethicists set policies for how companies can ethically use AI while protecting against data leaks and major mistakes AI agents can make, such as deleting 2.5 years’ worth of records.

15 high-salary jobs in 2026

Here is the full list of 15 high-paying jobs in the age of AI, as well as a salary range and degree requirements for each.

  • Chief AI officer — $200,000–$500,000 (bachelor’s degree minimum)
  • Telemedicine physician — $240,000 (MD or MSN)
  • Cloud architect — $132,000–$200,000 (bachelor’s and/or cloud certification)
  • Machine learning specialist — $129,000–$200,000 (bachelor’s)
  • Chief listening officer — $151,000 (bachelor’s)
  • AI engineer — $142,000 (degree required)
  • Influencer manager — $135,000 (no degree required)
  • AI ethicist — $70,000–$170,000 (bachelor’s)
  • Data protection officer — $118,000 (bachelor’s minimum)
  • Data scientist — $112,000 (bachelor’s)
  • Climate change analyst — $112,000 (bachelor’s)
  • Drone operator — $71,000–$100,000 (remote pilot certificate)
  • AEO specialist — $91,000–$180,000 (no degree required)
  • SEO specialist — $86,000+ (no degree required)
  • Social media manager — $74,000–$200,000+ (no degree required)

However, Cenedella adds that degree requirements shouldn’t be a main focus. “The smartest move a worker can make today is to stop treating a degree as the main thing that qualifies them and start building proof for why they should own a role instead,” Cenedella tells Fast Company. “Whatever your current job is, do a piece of it with AI, capture the result, and put it somewhere you can show it: A year of quietly documented results beats a degree program that won’t exist until you’re already too late to it.”

Feature image credit: Adobe Stock

By Jennifer Mattson

Jennifer Mattson is a Contributing Writer at Fast Company, where she covers news trends and writes daily about businesstechnologyfinance and the workplace.. She is a former network news producer for CNN, CNN International and a number of public radio programs More

Sourced from Fast Company